respect error (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

respect error in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1895–1980 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Hill v. Hill green
ncctapp · 1971
1 sentence

1980In reaching this conclusion, Judge Hairston obviously relied on our holding in Hill v. Hill, 11 N.C.

11980–1980
Spencer v. . Brown green
nc · 1938
2 sentences

1941We do not regard the instruction as adequately meeting the requirements of the statute, and in this respect there is error entitling defendant to a new trial." See also Spencer v. Brown , 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 ; Kolman v. Silbert, ante , 134; Barnes v. Teer, ante , 823.

1941We do not regard the instruction as adequately meeting the requirements of the statute, and in this respect there is error entitling defendant to a new trial." See also Spencer v. Brown , 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 ; Kolman v. Silbert, ante , 134; Barnes v. Teer, ante , 823.

11941–1941
Rankin v. . Mfg. Co. neutral
nc · 1937
2 sentences

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co. , 214 N.C. 489 ; Farrow v. White , 212 N.C. 376 , 193 S.E. 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co. , 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 .

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co., 214 N. C., 489 ; Farrow v. White, 212 N. C., 376 , 193 S. E., 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co., 197 N. C., 12 , 147 S. E., 435 .

11939–1939
Farrow Ex Rel. Farrow v. White neutral
nc · 1937
2 sentences

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co. , 214 N.C. 489 ; Farrow v. White , 212 N.C. 376 , 193 S.E. 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co. , 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 .

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co., 214 N. C., 489 ; Farrow v. White, 212 N. C., 376 , 193 S. E., 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co., 197 N. C., 12 , 147 S. E., 435 .

11939–1939
Robinson, Hudson, Blackburn v. . Transp. Co. green
nc · 1938
2 sentences

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co. , 214 N.C. 489 ; Farrow v. White , 212 N.C. 376 , 193 S.E. 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co. , 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 .

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co., 214 N. C., 489 ; Farrow v. White, 212 N. C., 376 , 193 S. E., 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co., 197 N. C., 12 , 147 S. E., 435 .

11939–1939
Williams v. Eastern Carolina Coach Co. green
nc · 1929
2 sentences

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co. , 214 N.C. 489 ; Farrow v. White , 212 N.C. 376 , 193 S.E. 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co. , 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 .

1939Robinson v. Transportation Co. , 214 N.C. 489 ; Farrow v. White , 212 N.C. 376 , 193 S.E. 386 ; Williams v. Coach Co. , 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 .

11939–1939
Campbell v. . McCormac neutral
nc · 1884
1 sentence

1924In Piner v. Brittain, 165 N. C., 401 , this statute was construed as imposing on the defendant the burden of showing by the greater weight of the evidence that the contract was not supported by a valuable consideration and as modifying in this respect the rule previously obtaining as expressed in Campbell v. McCormac, supra. But this statute applies only to negotiable instruments.

11924–1924
Piner v. . Brittain green
nc · 1914
1 sentence

1924In Piner v. Brittain, 165 N. C., 401 , this statute was construed as imposing on the defendant the burden of showing by the greater weight of the evidence that the contract was not supported by a valuable consideration and as modifying in this respect the rule previously obtaining as expressed in Campbell v. McCormac, supra. But this statute applies only to negotiable instruments.

11924–1924
Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos. green
· 1872
1 sentence

1920L., 159), and in this respect the standard form of policy, which has been adopted by legislative enactment *Page 262 (Rev., 4760), in making provision for subrogation, is but declaratory of principles already existing, citing Hall v. Railroad Co. , 80 U.S. 367 ; Railroad Co. v. Juery , 111 U.S. 594 ; Phoenix Ins.

11920–1920
State v. . Hawkins neutral
· 1877
1 sentence

1895In State v. Hawkins, 77 N. C., 494 , it is held that any public officer is liable to indictment at common law for any wilful neglect of his duties or any abuse of his powers.

11895–1895

Where else courts name it

NY 24 (1835–1987) MO 19 (1886–1981) CA 17 (1893–1994) TX 11 (1882–2021) IL 11 (1884–1990) MA 10 (1912–2018) PA 10 (1907–2019) NJ 7 (1924–1990) AR 7 (1905–2005) NC 6 (1895–1980) KY 6 (1913–1982) GA 6 (1893–2019) MN 5 (1905–1949) NV 5 (1876–1961) LA 5 (1950–1982) NE 4 (1894–2022) KS 4 (1889–1972) FL 4 (1956–2007) ND 4 (1953–2001) CO 4 (1906–1960) AZ 3 (1966–2021) CT 3 (1961–2019) AL 3 (1919–1973) OK 3 (1913–1961) DE 2 (1953–2019) MS 2 (1951–1989) IN 2 (1962–2000) VA 2 (1915–1983) WV 2 (1888–1961) NM 2 (1905–1918) TN 2 (1949–2000) WA 2 (1901–1911) MI 2 (1971–1981) OR 2 (1913–1997) IA 2 (1914–1969)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check