5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. Milivojevichgreen2 sentences2016Snyder, 471 N.W.2d at 720-21 . 12 governmental entanglement precludes judicial review.” Id. (citing Milivojevich, 426 U.S. at 717, 721 ). 2015Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 713-14 , 96 S. Ct. 2372, 2382 (1976) (emphasis omitted) (quotation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Schoenhals v. Mainsgreen2 sentences2015In its interpretation of the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, the district court relied on our decision in Schoenhals v. Mains, 504 N.W.2d 233, 235 (Minn. App. 1993). 2015Likewise here, any examination into whether the statements were truthful would be an “impermissible inquiry into Church doctrine and discipline,” id., because the statements were directly related to the Church’s reasons for excommunicating the Pfeils. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Webbgreen1 sentence1998A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence requires “a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, was sufficient to permit the jurors to reach the verdict which they did.” State v. Webb, 440 N.W.2d 426, 430 (Minn.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schradi v. Dornfeld
neutral
2 sentences1954Schradi v. Dornfeld, 52 Minn. 465 , 55 N. W. 49 ; Lindstrom v. Tell, 131 Minn. 203 , 154 N. W. 969 ; Mattson v. Saastamoinen, 168 Minn. 178 , 209 N. W. 648 .” The order appealed from is affirmed. 1954Schradi v. Dornfeld, 52 Minn. 465 , 55 N. W. 49 ; Lindstrom v. Tell, 131 Minn. 203 , 154 N. W. 969 ; Mattson v. Saastamoinen, 168 Minn. 178 , 209 N. W. 648 .” The order appealed from is affirmed. | 2 | 1928–1954 |
Lindstrom v. Tell
green
2 sentences1954Schradi v. Dornfeld, 52 Minn. 465 , 55 N. W. 49 ; Lindstrom v. Tell, 131 Minn. 203 , 154 N. W. 969 ; Mattson v. Saastamoinen, 168 Minn. 178 , 209 N. W. 648 .” The order appealed from is affirmed. 1954Schradi v. Dornfeld, 52 Minn. 465 , 55 N. W. 49 ; Lindstrom v. Tell, 131 Minn. 203 , 154 N. W. 969 ; Mattson v. Saastamoinen, 168 Minn. 178 , 209 N. W. 648 .” The order appealed from is affirmed. | 2 | 1928–1954 |
Mattson v. Saastamoinen
green
2 sentences1954Schradi v. Dornfeld, 52 Minn. 465 , 55 N. W. 49 ; Lindstrom v. Tell, 131 Minn. 203 , 154 N. W. 969 ; Mattson v. Saastamoinen, 168 Minn. 178 , 209 N. W. 648 .” The order appealed from is affirmed. 1954Schradi v. Dornfeld, 52 Minn. 465 , 55 N. W. 49 ; Lindstrom v. Tell, 131 Minn. 203 , 154 N. W. 969 ; Mattson v. Saastamoinen, 168 Minn. 178 , 209 N. W. 648 .” The order appealed from is affirmed. | 2 | 1928–1954 |
Black v. Snyder
green
2 sentences2016Snyder, 471 N.W.2d at 720-21 . . 1 Respondents also contend that the Pfeils’ claims are barred by the Freedom of Conscience Clause in Article I, section 16 of the, Minnesota Constitution. 2016Snyder, 471 N.W.2d at 720-21 . 12 governmental entanglement precludes judicial review.” Id. (citing Milivojevich, 426 U.S. at 717, 721 ). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.