Church brief (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

Church brief in Ohio

8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1949–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Keathleygreen
ohioctapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Traffic Stops {¶ 19} " '[W]hen detaining a motorist for a traffic violation, an officer may delay a motorist for a time period sufficient to issue a ticket or warning.' " State v. Elliot, 2019- Guernsey County, Case No. 2024 CA 00014 7 Ohio-4411, ¶ 21 (5th Dist.) quoting State v. Batchili, 2007-Ohio-2204 , ¶ 12 quoting State v. Keathley, 55 Ohio App.3d 130, 131 (2nd Dist.1988).

11
Howard v. Covenant Apostolic Church, Inc.green
ohioctapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Thus, matters involving "[c]hurch discipline, ecclesiastical government, or 'the conformity of the members of the church to the standard of morals required of them' is beyond the scope of review by a secular tribunal." Howard v. Covenant Apostolic Church, Inc., 124 Ohio App.3d 24, 28-29 (1st Dist.1997), quoting Watson at 728-29 .

11
State v. Lentzgreen
ohio · 1994 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Whether the trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s case. {¶42} After reviewing Church’s brief including his contentions, we have interpreted Church’s first assignment of error in the following manner: The trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s petition for post-conviction relief. {¶43} Regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in post-conviction proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court has stated that where a defendant, represented by different counsel on direct appeal, "fails to raise

11
Sabo v. Schottgreen
ohio · 1994 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Whether the trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s case. {¶42} After reviewing Church’s brief including his contentions, we have interpreted Church’s first assignment of error in the following manner: The trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s petition for post-conviction relief. {¶43} Regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in post-conviction proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court has stated that where a defendant, represented by different counsel on direct appeal, "fails to raise

11
State v. Lentzgreen
ohio · 1994 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Whether the trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s case. {¶42} After reviewing Church’s brief including his contentions, we have interpreted Church’s first assignment of error in the following manner: The trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s petition for post-conviction relief. {¶43} Regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in post-conviction proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court has stated that where a defendant, represented by different counsel on direct appeal, "fails to raise

11
Knapp v. Edwards Laboratoriesgreen
ohio · 1980 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015As we recognized in our recitation of the statement of facts and procedural history, Amoako-Okyere provided this court with a transcript that included only the direct and re-direct testimony of numerous witnesses and did not include cross-examination testimony or the majority of the trial court's discussion of the Church's motion for directed verdict. {¶ 33} We recognize the general rule that "[w]hen portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned errors are omitted from the record, the reviewing court has nothing to pass upon and thus, as to those assigned errors, the court ha

11
Watson v. Jonesgreen
scotus · 1872 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997See Watson, supra, 80 U.S. 679 , 20 L.Ed. 666 ; Nunn, 506 F.Supp. at 448 .

1997See Watson, supra, 80 U.S. 679 , 20 L.Ed. 666 ; Nunn, 506 F.Supp. at 448 .

11
Estate of Hamiltongreen
· 1919 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1949–1949
1 sentence

1949See In re Estate of Hamilton, 181 Cal. 758 (cited with approval in Dempsey v. Christ the King Church, supra).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Cole green
ohio · 1982
2 sentences

2018Whether the trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s case. {¶42} After reviewing Church’s brief including his contentions, we have interpreted Church’s first assignment of error in the following manner: The trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s petition for post-conviction relief. {¶43} Regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in post-conviction proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court has stated that where a defendant, represented by different counsel on direct appeal, "fails to raise

2018Whether the trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s case. {¶42} After reviewing Church’s brief including his contentions, we have interpreted Church’s first assignment of error in the following manner: The trial court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of res judicata to Church’s petition for post-conviction relief. {¶43} Regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in post-conviction proceedings, the Ohio Supreme Court has stated that where a defendant, represented by different counsel on direct appeal, "fails to raise

12018–2018
Murphy v. City of Reynoldsburg green
ohio · 1992
2 sentences

2005Murphy v. Reynoldsburg, 65 Ohio St.3d 356 , 358-359 , 1992-Ohio-95 , 604 N.E.2d 138 . {¶ 15} With these principles in mind, we consider whether the trial court's judgment granting, in part, appellees' motion for summary judgment, and denying appellants' motion for summary judgment, was appropriate. {¶ 16} Initially, Manno and Yasenchack contend that the trial court erred by determining that their claims required analysis and/or interpretation of Church doctrine.

2005Murphy v. Reynoldsburg, 65 Ohio St.3d 356 , 358-359 , 1992-Ohio-95 , 604 N.E.2d 138 . {¶ 15} With these principles in mind, we consider whether the trial court's judgment granting, in part, appellees' motion for summary judgment, and denying appellants' motion for summary judgment, was appropriate. {¶ 16} Initially, Manno and Yasenchack contend that the trial court erred by determining that their claims required analysis and/or interpretation of Church doctrine.

12005–2005
Temple v. Wean United, Inc. green
ohio · 1977
1 sentence

1999In particular, appellant insists she was an invitee on the Church's property when she was injured and, therefore, the trial court erred in finding her "* * * status to be that of licensee." Civ.R. 56 (C) provides that summary judgment is proper if the trial court determines that: "`(1) [n]o genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion for

11999–1999
Hannah v. Dayton Power & Light Co. green
ohio · 1998
1 sentence

1999In particular, appellant insists she was an invitee on the Church's property when she was injured and, therefore, the trial court erred in finding her "* * * status to be that of licensee." Civ.R. 56 (C) provides that summary judgment is proper if the trial court determines that: "`(1) [n]o genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion for

11999–1999
Nunn v. Black green
vawd · 1981
1 sentence

1997See Watson, supra, 80 U.S. 679 , 20 L.Ed. 666 ; Nunn, 506 F.Supp. at 448 .

11997–1997

Where else courts name it

TX 68 (1916–2025) OR 36 (1896–2025) IL 20 (1895–2024) NY 20 (1988–2025) CA 14 (1948–2025) FL 13 (1984–2026) WA 13 (1979–2025) OH 8 (1949–2024) OK 8 (1967–2023) MA 7 (1993–2023) GA 7 (1948–2021) AZ 7 (2002–2025) MN 5 (1928–2016) SC 5 (1995–2017) TN 5 (1927–2025) VA 5 (1997–2025) AL 5 (2002–2014) NC 5 (1980–2022) KY 4 (1955–2017) MS 4 (2000–2009) DC 4 (1986–2025) PA 4 (1903–2021) NJ 4 (1978–1996) MO 4 (1967–2024) IA 3 (2012–2023) SD 3 (1948–2012) MD 3 (1996–2003) LA 3 (1989–2016) UT 3 (2021–2026) WV 2 (2017–2017) WI 2 (2001–2024) CO 2 (1996–2020) CT 2 (1998–1998) VT 2 (2013–2014) IN 2 (1958–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check