Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1981–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Simons v. Schiek's, Inc.green2 sentences1986In Simons v. Shiek’s, Inc., 275 Minn. 132, 138 , 145 N.W.2d 548, 552 (1966), the supreme court recognized that the impossibility of compliance with the one-year requirement under subd. (1) was sufficient to bring the case under subd. (6). 1986In Simons v. Shiek’s, Inc., 275 Minn. 132, 138 , 145 N.W.2d 548, 552 (1966), the supreme court recognized that the impossibility of compliance with the one-year requirement under subd. (1) was sufficient to bring the case under subd. (6). | 1 | 2 |
Marriage of Carlson v. Carlsongreen1 sentence1986Carlson v. Carlson, 371 N.W.2d 591, 595 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Kossak v. Stallinggreen2 sentences1981See id. 1981See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
J.J. v. Luckow
green
2 sentences1999Id. at 20 . 1999Id. at 20 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Marriage of Lindsey v. Lindsey
green
1 sentence1986In Simons , the supreme court ruled that the obvious impossibility of the movant’s compliance with the one-year requirement of clause (1) was sufficient to bring that case under clause (6). * * * A review of Simons and Lindsey [v. Lindsey, 369 N.W.2d 26 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) ] compels us to conclude that such allowance must be limited to the extraordinary circumstances. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Mattsen v. Packman
green
1 sentence1986In Mattsen v. Packman, 358 N.W.2d 48 (Minn.1984), the supreme court held that a conciliation court judgment extinguishes all claims, including a subsequent damage claim. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.