Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cooke v. Cookegreen1 sentence2025See In re Bird, No. 12-19-00184-CV, 2019 WL 2710249 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Tyler June 28, 2019) (orig. proceeding) (holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying subject’s motion to vacate protective order one month after order issued because trial court “only possessed jurisdiction to modify, not vacate, the protective order at the time [subject] filed his motion”); Cooke v. Cooke, 65 S.W.3d 785, 788 (Tex. App.— Dallas 2001, no pet.) (noting that trial court can rescind protective order after one year but “trial court’s jurisdiction during the first year of a protective order is lim | 1 | 1 |
Segal v. Emmes Capital, L.L.C.green1 sentence2020See Segal, 155 S.W.3d at 281 (held that to waive a right impliedly, the right must be assertable at the time the right is waived). | 1 | 1 |
Dragoo v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Dragoo, 96 S.W.3d at 314 . | 1 | 1 |
Cherokee Water Co. v. Gregg County Appraisal Districtgreen1 sentence2009Cherokee Water Co. v. Gregg County Appraisal Dist., 801 S.W.2d 872, 875 (Tex. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
General Dynamics Corp. v. Sharp
green
2 sentences2007See Nzedu, at 273; General Dynamics Corp., 919 S.W.2d at 866 . 2007See Nzedu, No. 03-05-00032-CV, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 3419 , at *17-18; General Dynamics Corp., 919 S.W.2d at 866 . 9 The Picketts also contend that the administrative exhaustion process required by Fodge, including the application of the Commission’s one-year rule, violates their due process rights. | 3 | 2007–2007 |
Popham v. Patterson
green
2 sentences1987Popham v. Patterson, 51 S.W.2d 680 (Tex. 1932); see also Attorney General Opinion V-1142 (1951). 1987Popham v. Patterson, 51 S.W.2d 680 (Tex. 1932); see also Attorney General Opinion V-1142 (1951). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, Superintendent
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.