5 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1982–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Linesgreen2 sentences1996Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines, 268 Minn. 141, 143 , 128 N.W.2d 324, 326 (1964). 1996Guhlke v. Roberts Truck Lines, 268 Minn. 141, 143 , 128 N.W.2d 324, 326 (1964). | 1 | 1 |
Underwood v. Town Board of Empiregreen2 sentences1992It is sufficient that the damage is shown to have been caused by the taking of part of his property even though it is damage of a type suffered by the public as a whole." See Underwood, 217 Minn. at 390 , 14 N.W.2d at 462 (decrease in market value "is the particular respect in which the deprivation causes damage for which compensation is allowed."). 1992It is sufficient that the damage is shown to have been caused by the taking of part of his property even though it is damage of a type suffered by the public as a whole.” See Underwood, 217 Minn, at 390, 14 N.W.2d at 462 (decrease in market value “is the particular respect in which the deprivation causes damage for which compensation is allowed.”). | 1 | 1 |
City of Crookston v. Ericksongreen2 sentences1992In City of Crookston v. Erickson, 244 Minn. 321, 325 , 69 N.W.2d 909, 912-13 (1955), this court set out the rule that “in cases where there is a partial taking, the injured owner is not required to show that the injury is peculiar to his remaining property. 1992In City of Crookston v. Erickson, 244 Minn. 321, 325 , 69 N.W.2d 909, 912-13 (1955), this court set out the rule that “in cases where there is a partial taking, the injured owner is not required to show that the injury is peculiar to his remaining property. | 1 | 1 |
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Proutgreen2 sentences1988This court set out the rule which bars litigation of a claim under the doctrine of res judicata in The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , 124 N.W.2d 328, 340 (1963), as follows: “A judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privites, not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated, therein.” Citing Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , 121 N.W. 141 , 142 (1896). 1988This court set out the rule which bars litigation of a claim under the doctrine of res judicata in The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , 124 N.W.2d 328, 340 (1963), as follows: “A judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privites, not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated, therein.” Citing Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , 121 N.W. 141 , 142 (1896). | 1 | 1 |
Hauser v. Mealeygreen1 sentence1988See also, Hauser v. Medley, 263 N.W.2d 803, 806 (Minn.1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Veline v. Dahlquist
green
1 sentence1988This court set out the rule which bars litigation of a claim under the doctrine of res judicata in The Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout, 266 Minn. 450, 466 , 124 N.W.2d 328, 340 (1963), as follows: “A judgment on the merits constitutes an absolute bar to a second suit for the same cause of action, and is conclusive between parties and privites, not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated, therein.” Citing Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , 121 N.W. 141 , 142 (1896). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1986In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), the Court set out the test for reversing a conviction on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel: A convicted defendant’s claim that counsel’s assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction * * * has two components. 1986In Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), the Court set out the test for reversing a conviction on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel: A convicted defendant’s claim that counsel’s assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction * * * has two components. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.
green
1 sentence1982This court set out the test for determining which information is confidential or a trade secret in Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc., 278 N.W.2d 81 (Minn.1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.