set out analysis in Indiana

7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Hensley v. Stategreen indctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010Query v. State, 745 N.E.2d 769, 771 (Ind.2001) (citing [Illinois v.] Gates [, 462 U.S. 218 , 238, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)]; Hensley v. State, 778 N.E.2d 484, 487 (Ind.Ct.App.2002).	1	1
Cheever-Ortiz v. Stategreen indctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010In Cheever-Ortiz v. State, 825 N.E.2d 867, 871-72 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), this court set out the standard of review and law regarding probable cause to support search warrants: In deciding whether to issue a search warrant, the task of the issuing judge is to make a practical, common sense decision whether, given all the cireum-stances set forth in the affidavit, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.	1	1
Query v. Stategreen ind · 2001 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010Query v. State, 745 N.E.2d 769, 771 (Ind.2001) (citing [Illinois v.] Gates [, 462 U.S. 218 , 238, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)]; Hensley v. State, 778 N.E.2d 484, 487 (Ind.Ct.App.2002).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
Illinois v. Gates green scotus · 1983 2 sentences 2010Query v. State, 745 N.E.2d 769, 771 (Ind.2001) (citing [Illinois v.] Gates [, 462 U.S. 218 , 238, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)]; Hensley v. State, 778 N.E.2d 484, 487 (Ind.Ct.App.2002). 2010Query v. State, 745 N.E.2d 769, 771 (Ind.2001) (citing [Illinois v.] Gates [, 462 U.S. 218 , 238, 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)]; Hensley v. State, 778 N.E.2d 484, 487 (Ind.Ct.App.2002).	1	2010–2010
Miller & Dobrin, Etc., Co. v. CAMDEN FIRE, ASS'N green njsuperctappdiv · 1959 2 sentences 1997This, in turn, requires a finding that [the arsonist] was the dominant force in the affairs of [the corporation], and that the other parties in interest in the corporation permitted him to so control the affairs of the corporation that legally they may be held responsible for his acts and precluded from recovering for his wrongdoing. 150 A.2d at 282 . 1997This, in turn, requires a finding that [the arsonist] was the dominant force in the affairs of [the corporation], and that the other parties in interest in the corporation permitted him to so control the affairs of the corporation that legally they may be held responsible for his acts and precluded from recovering for his wrongdoing. 150 A.2d at 282 .	1	1997–1997
Wedmore v. State green ind · 1988 1 sentence 1990In Wedmore v. State (1988), Ind., 519 N.E.2d 546 , this Court set out the test for determining the propriety of an instruction on a lesser included offense.	1	1990–1990
City of Anderson v. Salling Concrete Corp. green indctapp · 1980 1 sentence 1986In City of Anderson v. Salling Concrete Corp. (1980), Ind.App., 411 N.E.2d 728, 733 , this Court set out the rule for measuring damages for *1285 breaching a construction contract.	1	1986–1986
Cockrum v. State neutral ind · 1968 2 sentences 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru	1	1981–1981
Hash v. State green ind · 1972 2 sentences 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru	1	1981–1981
Wathen v. State neutral ind · 1964 1 sentence 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru	1	1981–1981
Gayer v. State green ind · 1965 2 sentences 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru	1	1981–1981
New v. State green ind · 1970 2 sentences 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru 1981There this court held: In considering whether any error results from refusal of a tendered instruction we must determine: (1) whether the tendered instruction correctly states the law, Gayer v. State, (1965) 247 Ind. 113 , 210 N.E.2d 852 ; (2) whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction, Wathen v. State, (1965) 246 Ind. 245 , 204 N.E.2d 526 ; (3) whether the substance of the tendered instructions is covered by other instructions which are given, Hash v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 692 , 284 N.E.2d 770 ; New v. State, (1970) 254 Ind. 307 , 259 N.E.2d 696 ; Cockru	1	1981–1981
Davis v. State green ind · 1976 2 sentences 1981I, Sec. 18.” In Davis v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 476 , 355 N.E.2d 836 , 838 this Court set out the analysis for determining whether error results from the refusal of a tendered instruction. 1981I, Sec. 18.” In Davis v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 476 , 355 N.E.2d 836 , 838 this Court set out the analysis for determining whether error results from the refusal of a tendered instruction.	1	1981–1981
Winston v. State green indctapp · 1975 2 sentences 1976In Winston v. State (1975), 165 Ind. App. 369 , 332 N.E.2d 229 , the Court set out a framework for evaluating fundamental error claims. 1976In Winston v. State (1975), 165 Ind. App. 369 , 332 N.E.2d 229 , the Court set out a framework for evaluating fundamental error claims.	1	1976–1976
Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. Scott neutral indctapp · 1972 1 sentence 1974In Memorial Hospital of South Bend v. Scott (1972), Ind. App., 290 N.E.2d 80 , this court set out the standard for granting a motion for judgment on the evidence.	1	1974–1974

Where else courts name it

MS 60 (1974–2017) AL 59 (1981–2023) TX 40 (1980–2005) LA 33 (1983–2019) FL 14 (1982–2019) NC 13 (1984–2022) ID 13 (1983–2023) WV 11 (1986–2005) KS 9 (1937–1999) TN 8 (1983–2015) AR 7 (1976–2022) OR 7 (1982–2025) MO 7 (1963–2023) CA 7 (1978–2022) IN 7 (1974–2010) OK 6 (1974–2025) OH 6 (1977–2003) MA 5 (1987–2013) WI 5 (1979–1997) MD 5 (1975–1990) MN 5 (1982–1996) IL 4 (1973–1998) NM 4 (1948–2021) NY 4 (1923–2024) MT 3 (1984–1997) NJ 3 (1996–2016) MI 3 (1978–1996) WA 3 (1979–2020) KY 2 (2018–2021) SD 2 (1985–1995) HI 2 (1990–2012) UT 2 (1982–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check