Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Kansas City v. Wileygreen1 sentence1997Because “[a] judge’s regular rulings in the ordinary course of presiding over judicial proceedings properly before him will rarely if ever constitute evidence of partiality such as to require him in good conscience to recuse himself,” City of Kansas City v. Wiley, 697 S.W.2d 240, 244 (Mo.App. 1985), the trial judge’s evaluation of defense counsel in his Rule 29.07 ruling does not constitute a disqualifying bias. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Alabama
green
1 sentence2015Stated another way, unless the evaluation of those factors militate toward the imposition of life without possibility of parole, (an outcome Miller predicted would be "uncommon," 132 S.Ct. at 2469 ), that sentence cannot be imposed on a juvenile. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re KJK
green
1 sentence2005In re K.J.K., supra. That conclusion is not limited to an evaluation of the factors on which the trial court was required to make specific findings. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Berry v. Berry
green
1 sentence1985Id. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Butts v. United States
green
1 sentence1973The leading case is State v. Decker, 321 Mo. 1163 , 14 S.W.2d 617 (1929), decided before Sorrells, but which cited and followed Butts v. United States, 273 F. 35 (8th Cir. 1921), which at pages *751 37 and 38 set forth the subjective test. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. Decker
green
2 sentences1973The leading case is State v. Decker, 321 Mo. 1163 , 14 S.W.2d 617 (1929), decided before Sorrells, but which cited and followed Butts v. United States, 273 F. 35 (8th Cir. 1921), which at pages *751 37 and 38 set forth the subjective test. 1973The leading case is State v. Decker, 321 Mo. 1163 , 14 S.W.2d 617 (1929), decided before Sorrells, but which cited and followed Butts v. United States, 273 F. 35 (8th Cir. 1921), which at pages *751 37 and 38 set forth the subjective test. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.