Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2023 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bartlettgreen2 sentences2021“Although [N.C.G.S. § 15A-974(b)’s] directive is in the imperative form, only a material conflict in the evidence” requires a trial court to make “explicit factual findings that show the basis for the trial court’s ruling.” State v. Bartlett, 368 N.C. 309, 312 (2015) (citing State v. Salinas, 366 N.C. 119 , 123–24 (2012)). 2021“Although [N.C.G.S. § 15A-974(b)’s] directive is in the imperative form, only a material conflict in the evidence” requires a trial court to make “explicit factual findings that show the basis for the trial court’s ruling.” State v. Bartlett, 368 N.C. 309, 312 (2015) (citing State v. Salinas, 366 N.C. 119 , 123–24 (2012)). | 2 | 2 |
In re Z.L.W.green2 sentences2021See In re Z.L.W., 372 N.C. at 437 ; In re A.J.T., 374 N.C. at 512. ¶ 32 Notably, the trial court addressed N.C.G.S. § 7B-1110(a)(1)–(2) by recognizing the age of each child and finding that there was “a high likelihood that both children w[ould] be adopted” because Adam and Efia were placed with a caregiver who “intend[ed] to adopt as soon as possible.” In conformance with N.C.G.S. § 7B- 1110(a)(3), the trial court found that “[t]erminating the rights of [respondent-]mother w[ould] help accomplish the primary plan of adoption for these children and help achieve permanence . . . following years 2021See In re Z.L.W., 372 N.C. at 437 ; In re A.J.T., 374 N.C. at 512. ¶ 32 Notably, the trial court addressed N.C.G.S. § 7B-1110(a)(1)–(2) by recognizing the age of each child and finding that there was “a high likelihood that both children w[ould] be adopted” because Adam and Efia were placed with a caregiver who “intend[ed] to adopt as soon as possible.” In conformance with N.C.G.S. § 7B- 1110(a)(3), the trial court found that “[t]erminating the rights of [respondent-]mother w[ould] help accomplish the primary plan of adoption for these children and help achieve permanence . . . following years | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Seedy Fehli Anallagreen2 sentences2020Ed. 2d 598, 609 (1976); then citing United States v. Analla, 975 F.2d 119, 125 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S. Ct. 1853 , 123 L. 2020Ed. 2d 598, 609 (1976); then citing United States v. Analla, 975 F.2d 119, 125 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S. Ct. 1853 , 123 L. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Watsongreen2 sentences2020This determination requires an evaluation of factors like “the characteristics of the accused (such as age, maturity, education, intelligence, and experience) as well as the conditions under which the consent to search was given (such as the officer’s conduct; the number of officers present; and the duration, location, and time of the encounter).” See id. (first citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 424 , 96 S. Ct. 820, 828 , 46 L. 2020This determination requires an evaluation of factors like “the characteristics of the accused (such as age, maturity, education, intelligence, and experience) as well as the conditions under which the consent to search was given (such as the officer’s conduct; the number of officers present; and the duration, location, and time of the encounter).” See id. (first citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 424 , 96 S. Ct. 820, 828 , 46 L. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Salinas
green
2 sentences2021“Although [N.C.G.S. § 15A-974(b)’s] directive is in the imperative form, only a material conflict in the evidence” requires a trial court to make “explicit factual findings that show the basis for the trial court’s ruling.” State v. Bartlett, 368 N.C. 309, 312 (2015) (citing State v. Salinas, 366 N.C. 119 , 123–24 (2012)). 2021“Although [N.C.G.S. § 15A-974(b)’s] directive is in the imperative form, only a material conflict in the evidence” requires a trial court to make “explicit factual findings that show the basis for the trial court’s ruling.” State v. Bartlett, 368 N.C. 309, 312 (2015) (citing State v. Salinas, 366 N.C. 119 , 123–24 (2012)). | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
green
2 sentences2020This determination requires an evaluation of factors like “the characteristics of the accused (such as age, maturity, education, intelligence, and experience) as well as the conditions under which the consent to search was given (such as the officer’s conduct; the number of officers present; and the duration, location, and time of the encounter).” See id. (first citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 424 , 96 S. Ct. 820, 828 , 46 L. 2020This determination requires an evaluation of factors like “the characteristics of the accused (such as age, maturity, education, intelligence, and experience) as well as the conditions under which the consent to search was given (such as the officer’s conduct; the number of officers present; and the duration, location, and time of the encounter).” See id. (first citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 424 , 96 S. Ct. 820, 828 , 46 L. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Restrepo v. First National Bank of Dona Ana County
green
2 sentences2020Ed. 2d 598, 609 (1976); then citing United States v. Analla, 975 F.2d 119, 125 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S. Ct. 1853 , 123 L. 2020Ed. 2d 598, 609 (1976); then citing United States v. Analla, 975 F.2d 119, 125 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S. Ct. 1853 , 123 L. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Peterson v. Stafford
green
2 sentences2020Ed. 2d 598, 609 (1976); then citing United States v. Analla, 975 F.2d 119, 125 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S. Ct. 1853 , 123 L. 2020Ed. 2d 598, 609 (1976); then citing United States v. Analla, 975 F.2d 119, 125 (4th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1033 , 113 S. Ct. 1853 , 123 L. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Braverman v. United States
green
1 sentence2023Central to the evaluation of these factors is “the nature of the agreement.” Id. (citing Braverman, 317 U.S. 49 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Rozier
green
1 sentence2023Central to the evaluation of these factors is “the nature of the agreement.” Id. (citing Braverman, 317 U.S. 49 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.