aspect rule (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

aspect rule in Mississippi

5 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Pickens v. Donaldsongreen
miss · 1999 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2002–2003
2 sentences

2003See Pickens v. Donaldson, 748 So.2d 684, 690 (Miss.1999) (holding that the discovery rule did not toll statute of limitations in a medical malpractice action brought under the Act because the plaintiff made no claim that injury was latent, and offered no evidence that she did not or could not have discovered injury within the SOL). ś 96.

2002See Pickens v. Donaldson, 748 So.2d 684, 690 (Miss. 1999) (holding that the discovery rule did not toll statute of limitations in a medical malpractice action brought under the Act because the plaintiff made no claim that injury was latent, and offered no evidence that she did not or could not have discovered injury within the SOL). ¶96.

22
Fiddle, Inc. v. Shannongreen
miss · 2003 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011There is no distinction between the mechanics of our Rule 68 and Federal Rule 68; they are the same, Shannon, 834 So.2d at 49 (¶ 39), and the federal courts are well versed with this aspect of the rule. ¶ 80.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Estate of Schneider green
miss · 1991
2 sentences

1996In Estate of Schneider, 585 So.2d 1275 (Miss. 1993) this Court reversed and remanded a will contest case in which the chancery court had dismissed the action for failure to join necessary parties within the two-year period of admission of the challenged will to probate.

1993In Estate of Schneider, 585 So.2d 1275 (Miss.1993) this Court reversed and remanded a will contest case in which the chancery court had dismissed the action for failure to join necessary parties within the two-year period of admission of the challenged will to probate.

21993–1996

Where else courts name it

OH 204 (1995–2026) CA 122 (1903–2026) PA 53 (1933–2024) TX 39 (1983–2025) CT 34 (1950–2025) FL 27 (1961–2024) NJ 26 (1957–2024) IL 24 (1913–2026) MD 20 (1975–2026) WA 19 (1940–2024) NY 18 (1938–2017) VA 18 (1987–2025) MA 14 (1979–2025) MO 13 (1918–2025) CO 12 (1994–2018) LA 10 (1965–2012) AL 10 (1890–2002) ME 8 (1934–2022) UT 8 (1967–2026) NC 8 (1983–2021) MI 8 (1914–2024) OR 8 (1982–2022) WI 8 (1980–2026) NM 7 (1973–2017) KS 6 (1970–2026) WV 6 (1985–2024) DE 6 (2015–2025) AZ 6 (1970–2015) NE 6 (1994–2026) KY 5 (1960–2023) GA 5 (1976–2024) MS 5 (1993–2011) OK 5 (1966–2012) AK 4 (1976–2024) IA 4 (1978–2014) MN 4 (1939–2015) IN 4 (1966–2011) DC 3 (1985–2022) VT 3 (2005–2026) WY 2 (1991–2019) AR 2 (2008–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check