5 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2021 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Forrest County v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2021Forrest County v. Thompson, 204 Miss. 628, 657 , 37 So. 2d 787, 793 (1948). 2021Forrest County v. Thompson, 204 Miss. 628, 657 , 37 So. 2d 787, 793 (1948). | 1 | 1 |
Payne v. Skaargreen1 sentence2021P’ship, 952 P.2d 610, 614 (“[A]n established farm may not be able to institute a new or radically expanded ‘activity’ and maintain nuisance immunity, because the language of the statute focuses on agricultural activity that has been established prior to the urban encroachment.”); Payne v. Skaar, 900 P.2d 1352, 1355 (Idaho 1995) (“Under Skaar’s interpretation, any properly managed agricultural operation more than a year old, which was not a nuisance when the operation began, could thereafter expand without hindrance, and would be absolutely immune from a nuisance claim. | 1 | 1 |
Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders LPgreen1 sentence2021P’ship, 952 P.2d 610, 614 (“[A]n established farm may not be able to institute a new or radically expanded ‘activity’ and maintain nuisance immunity, because the language of the statute focuses on agricultural activity that has been established prior to the urban encroachment.”); Payne v. Skaar, 900 P.2d 1352, 1355 (Idaho 1995) (“Under Skaar’s interpretation, any properly managed agricultural operation more than a year old, which was not a nuisance when the operation began, could thereafter expand without hindrance, and would be absolutely immune from a nuisance claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
James Berry, Sr., James Berry, Sr. v. The Armstrong Rubber Company, J. Wesley Cooper v. The Armstrong Rubber Company
green
2 sentences1999The lower court accepted the Defendants' view as premised upon Berry v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 780 F.Supp. 1097 (S.D.Miss.1991), aff'd 989 F.2d 822 (5th Cir.1993). 1997The lower court accepted the Defendants' view as premised upon Berry v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 780 F.Supp. 1097 (S.D.Miss. 1991), aff'd 989 F.2d 822 (5th Cir. 1993). | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Berry v. Armstrong Rubber Co.
green
2 sentences1999The lower court accepted the Defendants' view as premised upon Berry v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 780 F.Supp. 1097 (S.D.Miss.1991), aff'd 989 F.2d 822 (5th Cir.1993). 1997The lower court accepted the Defendants' view as premised upon Berry v. Armstrong Rubber Co., 780 F.Supp. 1097 (S.D.Miss. 1991), aff'd 989 F.2d 822 (5th Cir. 1993). | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Donald v. Amoco Production Co.
green
2 sentences2021As to the plaintiff’s nuisance claim, this Court found that an issue of causation existed that “should be subject to discovery and further proceedings in the lower court.” Id. at 175 . 2021The plaintiff had alleged negligence per se because his property had been damaged “from violations of oil and gas regulations.” Id. at 176 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.