Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Guice v. Stategreen2 sentences2013On the other hand, “ ‘Delay is not an uncommon defense tactic’ because ‘[a]s the time between the commission of the crime and trial lengthens, witnesses may become unavailable or their memories may fade.’ ” Guice v. State, 952 So.2d 129, 145 (Miss.2007) (quoting Barker, 407 U.S. at 521 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ). 2012On the other hand, “‘Delay is not an uncommon defense tactic’ because ‘[a]s the time between the commission of the crime and trial lengthens, witnesses may become unavailable or their memories may fade.’” Guice v. State, 952 So. 2d 129, 145 (Miss. 2007) (quoting Barker, 407 U.S. at 521 ). | 2 | 2 |
Estelle v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2021The cases show, for example, that it is not an uncommon defense tactic to 8 produce the defendant in jail clothes in the hope of eliciting sympathy from the jury.” Estelle, 425 U.S. at 508 (collecting cases). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2013On the other hand, “ ‘Delay is not an uncommon defense tactic’ because ‘[a]s the time between the commission of the crime and trial lengthens, witnesses may become unavailable or their memories may fade.’ ” Guice v. State, 952 So.2d 129, 145 (Miss.2007) (quoting Barker, 407 U.S. at 521 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ). 2013On the other hand, “ ‘Delay is not an uncommon defense tactic’ because ‘[a]s the time between the commission of the crime and trial lengthens, witnesses may become unavailable or their memories may fade.’ ” Guice v. State, 952 So.2d 129, 145 (Miss.2007) (quoting Barker, 407 U.S. at 521 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ). | 3 | 2004–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.