Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nicholas Garcia, Jr. v. Dr. George J. Betogreen2 sentences2019Id. at 507-508 , citing Andern v. Watt, 475 F.2d 881, 882 (10th Cir. 1973); Watt v. Page, 452 F.2d 1174, 1176 (10 Cir. 1972), Cf. Garcia v. Beto, 452 F.2d 655, 656 (5th Cir. 1971). 2019Id. at 507-508 , citing Andern v. Watt, 475 F.2d 881, 882 (10th Cir. 1973); Watt v. Page, 452 F.2d 1174, 1176 (10 Cir. 1972), Cf. Garcia v. Beto, 452 F.2d 655, 656 (5th Cir. 1971). | 1 | 3 |
Park Anderson, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, the State of Oklahoma v. Henry Edward Wattgreen2 sentences2019Id. at 507-508 , citing Andern v. Watt, 475 F.2d 881, 882 (10th Cir. 1973); Watt v. Page, 452 F.2d 1174, 1176 (10 Cir. 1972), Cf. Garcia v. Beto, 452 F.2d 655, 656 (5th Cir. 1971). 2019Id. at 507-508 , citing Andern v. Watt, 475 F.2d 881, 882 (10th Cir. 1973); Watt v. Page, 452 F.2d 1174, 1176 (10 Cir. 1972), Cf. Garcia v. Beto, 452 F.2d 655, 656 (5th Cir. 1971). | 1 | 3 |
Henry Edward Watt v. Ray H. Page, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, and State of Oklahomagreen2 sentences2019Id. at 507-508 , citing Andern v. Watt, 475 F.2d 881, 882 (10th Cir. 1973); Watt v. Page, 452 F.2d 1174, 1176 (10 Cir. 1972), Cf. Garcia v. Beto, 452 F.2d 655, 656 (5th Cir. 1971). 2019Id. at 507-508 , citing Andern v. Watt, 475 F.2d 881, 882 (10th Cir. 1973); Watt v. Page, 452 F.2d 1174, 1176 (10 Cir. 1972), Cf. Garcia v. Beto, 452 F.2d 655, 656 (5th Cir. 1971). | 1 | 2 |
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences2020As the Barker court explained, the speedy-trial right is unusual in that deprivation of the right sometimes works to the advantage of the accused. 407 U.S. at 521 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (“Delay is not an uncommon defense tactic. 2020As the Barker court explained, the speedy-trial right is unusual in that deprivation of the right sometimes works to the advantage of the accused. 407 U.S. at 521 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (“Delay is not an uncommon defense tactic. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Estelle v. Williams
green
2 sentences2023“The cases show, for example, that it is not an uncommon defense tactic to produce the defendant in jail clothes in the hope of eliciting sympathy from the jury.” Id. at 508 . 2008The Supreme Court noted that "it is not an uncommon defense tactic to produce the defendant in jail clothes in the hope of eliciting sympathy from the jury." Id. at 508 . | 6 | 2001–2023 |
Watt v. Page
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 508 ; citing Anderson v. Watt (C.A .10, 1973), 475 F.2d 881 , 882 ; Watt v. Page (C.A. 10, 1972), 452 F .2d 1174, 1176, certiorari denied (1972), 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1520 ; Garcia v. Beto (C.A.5, 1971), 452 F.2d 655 , 656 . *Page 24 {¶ 39} The Estelle court further stated that: "Under our adversary system, once a defendant has the assistance of counsel the vast array of trial decisions, strategic and tactical, which must be made before and during trial rests with the accused and his attorney. 2008Id. at 508 ; citing Anderson v. Watt (C.A .10, 1973), 475 F.2d 881 , 882 ; Watt v. Page (C.A. 10, 1972), 452 F .2d 1174, 1176, certiorari denied (1972), 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1520 ; Garcia v. Beto (C.A.5, 1971), 452 F.2d 655 , 656 . *Page 24 {¶ 39} The Estelle court further stated that: "Under our adversary system, once a defendant has the assistance of counsel the vast array of trial decisions, strategic and tactical, which must be made before and during trial rests with the accused and his attorney. | 2 | 2001–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.