ruled doctrine (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

ruled doctrine in North Carolina

5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1931–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Ivey v. Rosegreen
ncctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992App. 525, 531 , 315 S.E.2d 711, 714 , disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 756 , 321 S.E.2d 134 (1984), this Court ruled that the doctrine of punitive damages against impaired drivers applies “in certain situations without regard to the drivers’ motives or intent.” Accord Ivey v. Rose, 94 N.C.

1992App. 773, 776 , 381 S.E.2d 476, 478 (1989) (“act of driving while impaired is a wanton act”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Dixon green
scotus · 1993
2 sentences

2022In Dixon, the Court ruled that the test “is wholly inconsistent with earlier Supreme Court precedent and with the clear common-law understanding of double jeopardy.” Id.

2022In Dixon, the Court ruled that the test “is wholly inconsistent with earlier Supreme Court precedent and with the clear common-law understanding of double jeopardy.” Id.

22022–2022
State v. Van Landingham green
nc · 1973
1 sentence

2012Id.

12012–2012
Huff v. Chrismon green
ncctapp · 1984
1 sentence

1992App. 525, 531 , 315 S.E.2d 711, 714 , disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 756 , 321 S.E.2d 134 (1984), this Court ruled that the doctrine of punitive damages against impaired drivers applies “in certain situations without regard to the drivers’ motives or intent.” Accord Ivey v. Rose, 94 N.C.

11992–1992
Clark v. Jones neutral
nc · 1984
1 sentence

1992App. 525, 531 , 315 S.E.2d 711, 714 , disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 756 , 321 S.E.2d 134 (1984), this Court ruled that the doctrine of punitive damages against impaired drivers applies “in certain situations without regard to the drivers’ motives or intent.” Accord Ivey v. Rose, 94 N.C.

11992–1992
Holbrook v. American National Insurance neutral
nc · 1928
2 sentences

1931Co., 196 N. C., 333 , 145 S. E., 609 , did not apply *787 to such reasonable limitations contained in the policy itself.

1931Co., 196 N. C., 333 , 145 S. E., 609 , did not apply *787 to such reasonable limitations contained in the policy itself.

11931–1931

Where else courts name it

CA 37 (1965–2026) IL 17 (1971–2022) NY 16 (1962–2020) WA 15 (1904–2019) GA 14 (1898–2022) TX 14 (1973–2026) FL 13 (1965–2020) PA 12 (1973–2022) MO 11 (1934–2023) CO 10 (1947–2012) TN 8 (2004–2020) LA 7 (1921–2008) MI 7 (1960–2023) NJ 7 (1966–2019) OK 6 (1970–2026) ID 6 (1978–2023) MS 6 (1993–2011) AZ 6 (1983–2015) OH 6 (1857–2024) KS 6 (2004–2021) MD 6 (1973–2024) DC 5 (1984–2023) NC 5 (1931–2022) AL 4 (1986–2007) OR 4 (1998–2025) CT 4 (1981–2016) WV 4 (1986–2014) MN 4 (1984–2016) IN 4 (1987–2016) ND 4 (2010–2012) WY 4 (1992–2024) MA 4 (1887–1996) NH 3 (1996–2009) IA 3 (1981–2014) KY 3 (1978–2023) VA 3 (1995–2004) AR 3 (1911–1996) UT 3 (1990–1994) HI 3 (2002–2005) AK 3 (1981–1986) MT 3 (1987–1991) RI 2 (1986–2002) NM 2 (1983–2015) NV 2 (1970–1980)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check