ruled defense (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

ruled defense in Oklahoma

6 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Hanna neutral
oklacrimapp · 1975
2 sentences

1993In State v. Hanna, 540 P.2d 1190 (Okl.Cr.1975), this Court ruled that violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 801, does not require the use of a dangerous weapon, per se, but that the way in which an instrument is used is the controlling factor in determining whether it is a dangerous weapon.

1993In State v. Hanna, 540 P.2d 1190 (Okl.Cr. 1975), this Court ruled that violation of 21 O.S. 1971 , § 801, does not require the use of a dangerous weapon, per se, but that the way in which an instrument is used is the controlling factor in determining whether it is a dangerous weapon.

21981–1993
VASQUEZ v. STATE green
oklacrimapp · 2025
2 sentences

2026To do so, Judge Mills explained that some evidentiary foundation--beyond "suspicion or innuendo"--connecting Cantrell to Cardinal Point on January 20, 2017, was needed. ¶47 As the trial court recognized, a "quantum of evidence . . . is more than mere suspicion and innuendo[.]" Vasquez v. State , 2025 OK CR 1 564 P.3d 880 Gore v. State , 2005 OK CR 14 119 P.3d 1268 Gore, 2005 OK CR 14 Id.

2026To do so, Judge Mills explained that some evidentiary foundation--beyond "suspicion or innuendo"--connecting Cantrell to Cardinal Point on January 20, 2017, was needed. ¶47 As the trial court recognized, a "quantum of evidence . . . is more than mere suspicion and innuendo[.]" Vasquez v. State , 2025 OK CR 1 564 P.3d 880 Gore v. State , 2005 OK CR 14 119 P.3d 1268 Gore, 2005 OK CR 14 Id.

12026–2026
Gore v. State green
oklacrimapp · 2005
2 sentences

2026To do so, Judge Mills explained that some evidentiary foundation--beyond "suspicion or innuendo"--connecting Cantrell to Cardinal Point on January 20, 2017, was needed. ¶47 As the trial court recognized, a "quantum of evidence . . . is more than mere suspicion and innuendo[.]" Vasquez v. State , 2025 OK CR 1 564 P.3d 880 Gore v. State , 2005 OK CR 14 119 P.3d 1268 Gore, 2005 OK CR 14 Id.

2026To do so, Judge Mills explained that some evidentiary foundation--beyond "suspicion or innuendo"--connecting Cantrell to Cardinal Point on January 20, 2017, was needed. ¶47 As the trial court recognized, a "quantum of evidence . . . is more than mere suspicion and innuendo[.]" Vasquez v. State , 2025 OK CR 1 564 P.3d 880 Gore v. State , 2005 OK CR 14 119 P.3d 1268 Gore, 2005 OK CR 14 Id.

12026–2026
Matter of Estate of Maheras green
okla · 1995
1 sentence

2008"The person who desires to overcome this presumption must then go forward to produce evidence showing either that (a) the confidential relationship had been severed before the critical events in controversy or (b) the will's maker actually received independent and competent advice about the disposition of his/her estate." In the Matter of the Estate of Maheras, 1995 OK 40 , ¶ 9, 897 P.2d 268, 273 .

12008–2008
Cross v. Cross green
moctapp · 1977
1 sentence

2001The case of Cross v. Cross, 559 S.W.2d 196 (Mo.Ct.App.1977), represents the other view.

12001–2001
Johnson v. State green
· 1908
2 sentences

1970In Johnson v. State, 1 Okl.Cr. 321 , 97 P. 1059 , this Court ruled that error in overruling a proper challenge to a juror becomes grounds for reversal when the defendant is forced to use one of his peremptory challenges on said juror and that the defendant exhausted all his peremptory challenges, and that by reason of this an incompetent juror was forced upon him.

1970In Johnson v. State, 1 Okl.Cr. 321 , 97 P. 1059 , this Court ruled that error in overruling a proper challenge to a juror becomes grounds for reversal when the defendant is forced to use one of his peremptory challenges on said juror and that the defendant exhausted all his peremptory challenges, and that by reason of this an incompetent juror was forced upon him.

11970–1970

Where else courts name it

CA 37 (1965–2026) IL 17 (1971–2022) NY 16 (1962–2020) WA 15 (1904–2019) GA 14 (1898–2022) TX 14 (1973–2026) FL 13 (1965–2020) PA 12 (1973–2022) MO 11 (1934–2023) CO 10 (1947–2012) TN 8 (2004–2020) LA 7 (1921–2008) MI 7 (1960–2023) NJ 7 (1966–2019) OK 6 (1970–2026) ID 6 (1978–2023) MS 6 (1993–2011) AZ 6 (1983–2015) OH 6 (1857–2024) KS 6 (2004–2021) MD 6 (1973–2024) DC 5 (1984–2023) NC 5 (1931–2022) AL 4 (1986–2007) OR 4 (1998–2025) CT 4 (1981–2016) WV 4 (1986–2014) MN 4 (1984–2016) IN 4 (1987–2016) ND 4 (2010–2012) WY 4 (1992–2024) MA 4 (1887–1996) NH 3 (1996–2009) IA 3 (1981–2014) KY 3 (1978–2023) VA 3 (1995–2004) AR 3 (1911–1996) UT 3 (1990–1994) HI 3 (2002–2005) AK 3 (1981–1986) MT 3 (1987–1991) RI 2 (1986–2002) NM 2 (1983–2015) NV 2 (1970–1980)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check