Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scott v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See id. at 184 , 840 A.2d 715 . 2006See id. at 184 , 840 A.2d 715 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Zappone v. Liberty Life Insurance
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 68 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Woodland
green
2 sentences2014In State v. Woodland, 337 Md. 519 , 654 A.2d 1314 (1995), the Court ruled that the defense witness’ prior conviction for possession with intent to distribute was similarly admissible for impeachment purposes, as long as the trial judge conducts the proper balancing test. 2014In State v. Woodland, 337 Md. 519 , 654 A.2d 1314 (1995), the Court ruled that the defense witness’ prior conviction for possession with intent to distribute was similarly admissible for impeachment purposes, as long as the trial judge conducts the proper balancing test. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
G-C Partnership v. Schaefer
green
2 sentences2009In G-C P’ship , a case involving issues of appealability, the Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal from a trial court’s judgments as to contract damages filed before the court ruled on a claim for contractually-based attorney’s fees, id. at 487-89 , 749 A.2d 823 , where the merits of the case involved a breach of a guaranty agreement and the request for fees was based on a provision for attorney’s fees in that agreement obligating the guarantors to pay for “ ‘all legal and other expenses paid or incurred in enforcing the Guaranty.’ ” Id. at 486 , 749 A.2d 823 . 2009In G-C P’ship , a case involving issues of appealability, the Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal from a trial court’s judgments as to contract damages filed before the court ruled on a claim for contractually-based attorney’s fees, id. at 487-89 , 749 A.2d 823 , where the merits of the case involved a breach of a guaranty agreement and the request for fees was based on a provision for attorney’s fees in that agreement obligating the guarantors to pay for “ ‘all legal and other expenses paid or incurred in enforcing the Guaranty.’ ” Id. at 486 , 749 A.2d 823 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Mattvidi Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Nationsbank of Virginia, N.A.
green
1 sentence2009In G-C P’ship , a case involving issues of appealability, the Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal from a trial court’s judgments as to contract damages filed before the court ruled on a claim for contractually-based attorney’s fees, id. at 487-89 , 749 A.2d 823 , where the merits of the case involved a breach of a guaranty agreement and the request for fees was based on a provision for attorney’s fees in that agreement obligating the guarantors to pay for “ ‘all legal and other expenses paid or incurred in enforcing the Guaranty.’ ” Id. at 486 , 749 A.2d 823 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
McMillian v. Monroe County
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 786 , 117 S.Ct. 1734 . 2008Id. at 786 , 117 S.Ct. 1734 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
McCarson v. State
green
1 sentence1973McCarson v. State, 8 Md. *647 App. 20, 257 A. 2d 471 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.