case for an evidentiary hearing in Georgia

39 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (32)

Case	Followed	Cited
Hung v. Stategreen ga · 2007 · cited in 5 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2016 2 sentences 2016However, given the fact that “this appeal was appellant’s first opportunity to raise the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we will remand the case for an evidentiary hearing on that claim.” Hung v. State, 282 Ga. 684, 685 (2) ( 653 SE2d 48 ) (2007) (punctuation omitted). 2016However, given the fact that “this appeal was appellant’s first opportunity to raise the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we will remand the case for an evidentiary hearing on that claim.” Hung v. State, 282 Ga. 684, 685 (2) ( 653 SE2d 48 ) (2007) (punctuation omitted).	4	5
Southern Co. v. Hamburggreen gactapp · 1996 · cited in 3 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1998–2002 2 sentences 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Penny packer's, 194 Ga.App. 169, 171 (2), 390 S.E.2d 257 ." Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga.App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [ 447 S.E.2d 83 ].' Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga.App. 736, 737 (1), 738, 458 S.E.2d 711 ." Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga.App. 834, 842 (5), 470 S.E.2d 467 , supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing. 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, 194 Ga. App. 169, 171 (2) ( 390 SE2d 257 ).” Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga. App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [( 447 SE2d 83 )].’ Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga. App. 736, 737 (1), 738 ( 458 SE2d 711 ).” Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga. App. 834, 842 (5), supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing.	3	3
Lee v. Stategreen gactapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Id. at 715-716 (3). 2012Id. at 715-716 (3).	2	2
Grier v. Stategreen gactapp · 2003 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2005–2006 2 sentences 2006Grier v. State, 262 Ga. App. 777, 781 (3) ( 586 SE2d 448 ) (2003). 2006Grier v. State, 262 Ga. App. 777, 781 (3) ( 586 SE2d 448 ) (2003).	2	2
Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, Inc.green gactapp · 1995 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, 194 Ga. App. 169, 171 (2) ( 390 SE2d 257 ).” Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga. App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [( 447 SE2d 83 )].’ Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga. App. 736, 737 (1), 738 ( 458 SE2d 711 ).” Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga. App. 834, 842 (5), supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing. 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, 194 Ga. App. 169, 171 (2) ( 390 SE2d 257 ).” Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga. App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [( 447 SE2d 83 )].’ Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga. App. 736, 737 (1), 738 ( 458 SE2d 711 ).” Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga. App. 834, 842 (5), supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing.	2	2
Mitcham v. Blalockgreen gactapp · 1994 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, 194 Ga. App. 169, 171 (2) ( 390 SE2d 257 ).” Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga. App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [( 447 SE2d 83 )].’ Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga. App. 736, 737 (1), 738 ( 458 SE2d 711 ).” Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga. App. 834, 842 (5), supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing. 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, 194 Ga. App. 169, 171 (2) ( 390 SE2d 257 ).” Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga. App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [( 447 SE2d 83 )].’ Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga. App. 736, 737 (1), 738 ( 458 SE2d 711 ).” Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga. App. 834, 842 (5), supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing.	2	2
Howell Mill/Collier Associates v. Pennypacker's, Inc.green gactapp · 1990 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, 194 Ga. App. 169, 171 (2) ( 390 SE2d 257 ).” Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga. App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [( 447 SE2d 83 )].’ Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga. App. 736, 737 (1), 738 ( 458 SE2d 711 ).” Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga. App. 834, 842 (5), supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing. 1998Howell Mill/Collier Assoc. v. Pennypacker’s, 194 Ga. App. 169, 171 (2) ( 390 SE2d 257 ).” Mitcham v. Blalock, 214 Ga. App. 29, 31 (2), 32 [( 447 SE2d 83 )].’ Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, 217 Ga. App. 736, 737 (1), 738 ( 458 SE2d 711 ).” Southern Co. v. Hamburg, 220 Ga. App. 834, 842 (5), supra. This Court, therefore, remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of attorney fees attributable to probative evidence offered at the hearing.	2	2
Adams v. Stategreen gactapp · 1990 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993 2 sentences 1993Nonetheless, under this court's holding in Parrish v. State, [supra], the lack of any opportunity for a hearing before the trial court requires that we remand this case for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of the asserted ineffectiveness of appellant's 79 trial counsel." Adams v. State, 196 Ga. App. 804, 806 (2) ( 397 SE2d 153 ) (1990). 1993Nonetheless, under this court's holding in Parrish v. State, [supra], the lack of any opportunity for a hearing before the trial court requires that we remand this case for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of the asserted ineffectiveness of appellant's 79 trial counsel." Adams v. State, 196 Ga. App. 804, 806 (2) ( 397 SE2d 153 ) (1990).	2	2
Wilson v. Stategreen ga · 2009 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 2 sentences 2019However, it is a "fundamental rule that ineffectiveness claims must be raised at the earliest practicable moment." Wilson v. State , 286 Ga. 141 , 145, 686 S.E.2d 104 (2009). "[T]hat moment is before appeal if the opportunity to do so is available. 2019However, it is a "fundamental rule that ineffectiveness claims must be raised at the earliest practicable moment." Wilson v. State , 286 Ga. 141 , 145, 686 S.E.2d 104 (2009). "[T]hat moment is before appeal if the opportunity to do so is available.	1	2
Potter v. Stategreen ga · 2000 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2002–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	2
Clark v. Stategreen ga · 2020 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 2 sentences 2022In 2020, we vacated a trial court order denying his motion for out-of-time appeal and remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to “determine whether plea counsel’s ineffective assistance was responsible for Clark’s failure to pursue a timely appeal.” Clark v. State, 310 Ga. 489, 491 ( 852 SE2d 522 ) (2020) (citation 7 file a timely appeal, but more than six years later, she filed a motion for out-of-time appeal in the trial court, contending that she was deprived of her right to appeal because of her plea counsel’s ineffective assistance.2 After a hearing, the trial court denied Cook’s mot 2022In 2020, we vacated a trial court order denying his motion for out-of-time appeal and remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing to “determine whether plea counsel’s ineffective assistance was responsible for Clark’s failure to pursue a timely appeal.” Clark v. State, 310 Ga. 489, 491 ( 852 SE2d 522 ) (2020) (citation 7 file a timely appeal, but more than six years later, she filed a motion for out-of-time appeal in the trial court, contending that she was deprived of her right to appeal because of her plea counsel’s ineffective assistance.2 After a hearing, the trial court denied Cook’s mot	1	1
Pure Hospitality Solutions, Inc. v. Canouse.green gactapp · 2018 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020“Since this appeal involves questions of law concerning the nature of damages in [Ruberti’s] complaint and the trial court’s entry of default judgment for liquidated damages, this Court must review the record de novo and apply a ‘plain legal error’ standard of review.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Pure Hospitality Solutions, Inc. v. Canouse, 347 Ga. App. 592, 594 ( 820 SE2d 434 ) (2018). 2020“Since this appeal involves questions of law concerning the nature of damages in [Ruberti’s] complaint and the trial court’s entry of default judgment for liquidated damages, this Court must review the record de novo and apply a ‘plain legal error’ standard of review.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Pure Hospitality Solutions, Inc. v. Canouse, 347 Ga. App. 592, 594 ( 820 SE2d 434 ) (2018).	1	1
WILLIAM H. STOLL, LLC v. Scarbergreen gactapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 1 sentence 2020See Scarber, 287 Ga. App. at 674 (2) (affirming trial court’s denial of default judgment on attorney’s claim for legal fees under quantum meruit because such a claim is not one involving liquidated damages). 14 Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s award of liquidated and unliquidated damages and remand the case for an evidentiary hearing on the appropriate amount of damages.9 Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.	1	1
Leonard v. Stategreen gactapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	1
Williams v. Stategreen gactapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	1
Eller v. Stategreen gactapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	1
Barnett v. Stategreen gactapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	1
Mahone v. Stategreen gactapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012	1	1
Clyde v. Stategreen gactapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	1
Haywood v. Stategreen gactapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	1
Ingram v. Stategreen ga · 2003 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	1
Baker v. Stategreen ga · 2001 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010	1	1
Powell v. Stategreen gactapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010	1	1
Lance v. Stategreen ga · 2002 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010	1	1
Southern Cellular Telecom v. Banksgreen gactapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998	1	1
Lee v. Stategreen gactapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993	1	1
Brady v. Stategreen gactapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993	1	1
Brown v. Stategreen gactapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992	1	1
French v. Stategreen ga · 1991 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991	1	1
Johnson v. Stategreen ga · 1989 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990	1	1
Parrish v. Stategreen gactapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990	1	1
Heard v. Stategreen gactapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
King v. State green gactapp · 1993 2 sentences 1995King v. State, 208 Ga.App. 77 (2) ( 430 SE2d 640 ) (1993)." Id. 1995King v. State, 208 Ga.App. 77 (2) ( 430 SE2d 640 ) (1993)." Id.	2	1995–1995
Sparks v. State green gactapp · 1986 2 sentences 1992"Even though there is some evidence of a neutral basis for some of the state's peremptory strikes against blacks so as to support its explanation, we must remand the case for an evidentiary hearing and trial decision, as was done in Mincey [ v. State, 180 Ga. App. 263 ( 349 SE2d 1 ) (1986), aff'd State v. Mincey, 256 Ga. 636 ( 353 SE2d 814 ) (1987)]; Sparks v. State, 180 Ga. App. 467 ( 349 SE2d 504 (1986) [aff'd State v. Sparks, 257 Ga. 97 ( 355 SE2d 658 ) (1987)]; and Wise v. State, 179 Ga. App. 115 ( 346 SE2d 393 ) (1986). 1992"Even though there is some evidence of a neutral basis for some of the state's peremptory strikes against blacks so as to support its explanation, we must remand the case for an evidentiary hearing and trial decision, as was done in Mincey [ v. State, 180 Ga. App. 263 ( 349 SE2d 1 ) (1986), aff'd State v. Mincey, 256 Ga. 636 ( 353 SE2d 814 ) (1987)]; Sparks v. State, 180 Ga. App. 467 ( 349 SE2d 504 (1986) [aff'd State v. Sparks, 257 Ga. 97 ( 355 SE2d 658 ) (1987)]; and Wise v. State, 179 Ga. App. 115 ( 346 SE2d 393 ) (1986).	2	1987–1992
Wise v. State green gactapp · 1986 2 sentences 1992"Even though there is some evidence of a neutral basis for some of the state's peremptory strikes against blacks so as to support its explanation, we must remand the case for an evidentiary hearing and trial decision, as was done in Mincey [ v. State, 180 Ga. App. 263 ( 349 SE2d 1 ) (1986), aff'd State v. Mincey, 256 Ga. 636 ( 353 SE2d 814 ) (1987)]; Sparks v. State, 180 Ga. App. 467 ( 349 SE2d 504 (1986) [aff'd State v. Sparks, 257 Ga. 97 ( 355 SE2d 658 ) (1987)]; and Wise v. State, 179 Ga. App. 115 ( 346 SE2d 393 ) (1986). 1992"Even though there is some evidence of a neutral basis for some of the state's peremptory strikes against blacks so as to support its explanation, we must remand the case for an evidentiary hearing and trial decision, as was done in Mincey [ v. State, 180 Ga. App. 263 ( 349 SE2d 1 ) (1986), aff'd State v. Mincey, 256 Ga. 636 ( 353 SE2d 814 ) (1987)]; Sparks v. State, 180 Ga. App. 467 ( 349 SE2d 504 (1986) [aff'd State v. Sparks, 257 Ga. 97 ( 355 SE2d 658 ) (1987)]; and Wise v. State, 179 Ga. App. 115 ( 346 SE2d 393 ) (1986).	2	1987–1992
Collier v. State green ga · 2019 1 sentence 2021Accordingly, we vacate the order denying Mendez’s motion for out-of-time appeal, remand the case for an evidentiary hearing on the motion, and direct the trial court to reconsider the motion in a manner consistent with the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Collier, supra. See Warner v. State, 353 Ga. App. 325 , 327 ( 836 SE2d 638 ) (2019).	1	2021–2021
Mallon v. State green gactapp · 2001 2 sentences 2019Rowland has cited Mallon v. State , 253 Ga. App. 51 , 54 (5), 557 S.E.2d 409 (2001), for the proposition that we should remand the case for an evidentiary hearing even though he has failed to identify any specific errors by counsel. 2019Rowland has cited Mallon v. State , 253 Ga. App. 51 , 54 (5), 557 S.E.2d 409 (2001), for the proposition that we should remand the case for an evidentiary hearing even though he has failed to identify any specific errors by counsel.	1	2019–2019
Nesbitt v. State green gactapp · 2008 2 sentences 2018See 335 Walsh , supra ; Nesbitt v. State , 295 Ga. App. 394 , 395-396, 671 S.E.2d 877 (2008) ; Shouse , supra at 532 , 376 S.E.2d 911 . 2018See 335 Walsh , supra ; Nesbitt v. State , 295 Ga. App. 394 , 395-396, 671 S.E.2d 877 (2008) ; Shouse , supra at 532 , 376 S.E.2d 911 .	1	2018–2018
Shouse v. State green gactapp · 1988 1 sentence 2018See *335 Walsh , supra ; Nesbitt v. State , 295 Ga. App. 394 , 395-396, 671 S.E.2d 877 (2008) ; Shouse , supra at 532 , 376 S.E.2d 911 .	1	2018–2018
Collins v. State green gactapp · 2006 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	2012–2012
Johnson v. State green gactapp · 1994 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	2012–2012
Walker v. State green gactapp · 2008 2 sentences 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow 2012Andrews and McFadden, JJ., concur. 1 Robinson does not challenge his conviction for criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. 2 Walker v. State, 290 Ga. App. 749 (1) ( 660 SE2d 844 ) (2008) (citations, punctuation and emphasis omitted). 3 278 Ga. App. 103 ( 628 SE2d 148 ) (2006). 4 Id. at 105 (1) (b). 5 Id. 6 OCGA § 8-3-1 et seq. 7 OCGA § 8-3-3.1 (emphasis supplied). 8 OCGA § 8-3-2. 9 OCGA §§ 8-3-1; 8-3-2. 10 See Mahone v. State, 296 Ga. App. 373, 374-376 (3) ( 674 SE2d 411 ) (2009) (recognizing that a development described by a witness only as a public housing project ow	1	2012–2012
Lloyd v. State green ga · 1988	1	1999–1999
Larochelle v. State green gactapp · 1996	1	1998–1998
State v. Sparks green ga · 1987	1	1992–1992
State v. Mincey green ga · 1987	1	1992–1992
Mincey v. State green gactapp · 1986	1	1992–1992

Statutes the citing opinions construe

GA § 5-5-40 (5) GA § 16-8-41 (3) GA § 5-6-34 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NM 94 (1991–2026) PA 72 (1967–2023) FL 53 (1981–2025) LA 47 (1980–2018) GA 39 (1986–2022) IL 35 (1973–2025) MI 23 (1974–2025) KS 18 (1969–2022) MS 17 (1992–2024) TN 16 (1970–2019) MO 13 (1975–2024) CT 11 (1988–2024) AL 10 (1985–2015) OK 8 (1983–2022) MD 8 (1967–2024) OH 8 (2001–2022) AZ 7 (1980–1997) CO 7 (1989–2025) UT 7 (1988–2022) MT 7 (2008–2009) CA 7 (1978–2025) WI 6 (1996–2026) MA 6 (1987–2018) IA 6 (2017–2022) MN 6 (1988–2016) VA 5 (1991–2020) ID 5 (1986–2021) WA 5 (1967–2005) TX 5 (1983–2018) NJ 4 (1997–2025) IN 4 (1980–2020) DC 4 (2011–2013) RI 4 (1981–1994) NV 4 (1974–2003) NH 3 (1975–2002) NY 3 (1975–1978) SC 3 (2005–2015) NC 2 (2011–2012) AR 2 (2014–2019) ND 2 (1978–2006) KY 2 (2017–2017) WY 2 (2013–2024) WV 2 (1986–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance