Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2022 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McAfee v. Stategreen1 sentence2021McAfee v. State, No. 15–1289, 2016 WL 7403710, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2016). | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Bradley Steven Grahamgreen1 sentence2020The State responds that the website Smith references “is outside the record on appeal” and “a remand is unnecessary” because Smith can move to correct an illegal sentence in his “original criminal case.” We need not address the ripeness question because, whatever Smith’s current incarceration status, his claim that the special sentence of lifetime parole categorically constitutes cruel and unusual punishment when imposed on a juvenile offender was addressed and rejected in State v. Graham, 897 N.W.2d 476, 488 (Iowa 2017). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hrbekgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Hrbek, 336 N.W.2d 431, 437 (Iowa 1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.
green
2 sentences2022Id. at 238–39. 2022Id. at 238–39. | 3 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.