Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1931–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. Stategreen2 sentences1981Such propensity is not considered relevant to identify and the probable prejudicial effect of such evidence lies at the root of the rule excluding it. 189 Tenn. at 641 , 227 S.W.2d 8 . 1981Such propensity is not considered relevant to identify and the probable prejudicial effect of such evidence lies at the root of the rule excluding it. 189 Tenn. at 641 , 227 S.W.2d 8 . | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bobo
green
1 sentence2013Id. at 764 (quoting Harris v. State, 227 S.W.2d 8, 10-11 (Tenn. 1950)). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Deitrick v. Greaney
green
1 sentence1992As we held in the Deitrick [v. Greaney] case, 309 U.S. [190] page 198, 60 S.Ct. [480] page 484, 84 L.Ed. 694 it is the “evil tendency” of the acts to contravene the policy governing banking transactions which lies at the root of the rule. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Portsmouth Gas Co. v. Sanford
green
2 sentences1931But the Court took cognizance of the recent passage by the legislature of an act exprssly providing that the salaries and wages of officers and employees should be subject to garnishment, attachment and execution; and the Court held that by this action “the legislature declared so sweepingly against the rule of public policy *168 with reference to employees of public corporations that it is difficult, upon any sound basis of reasoning, to sustain the doctrine in any respect.” And the Court said further: '‘In thus deliberately making’ so radical a change in the law which had become so well sett 1931But the Court took cognizance of the recent passage by the legislature of an act exprssly providing that the salaries and wages of officers and employees should be subject to garnishment, attachment and execution; and the Court held that by this action “the legislature declared so sweepingly against the rule of public policy *168 with reference to employees of public corporations that it is difficult, upon any sound basis of reasoning, to sustain the doctrine in any respect.” And the Court said further: '‘In thus deliberately making’ so radical a change in the law which had become so well sett | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.