Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd.green2 sentences2004See Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd., 82 S.W.3d 429, 439 (Tex.App.Dallas 2002, pet. denied). 2004See Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd. , 82 S.W.3d 429, 439 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2002, pet. denied). | 3 | 3 |
Plummer v. Bradfordgreen2 sentences1986Plummer v. Bradford, 395 S.W.2d 856, 859-61 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1965, no writ). 1986Plummer v. Bradford, 395 S.W.2d 856, 859-61 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston 1965, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Archer v. State
green
2 sentences1989In order to violate the rule, it is necessary that two (or more) witnesses confer on an issue bearing on the guilt or innocence of the accused and about which they later testify. 703 S.W.2d at 667 . 1989In order to violate the rule, it is necessary that two (or more) witnesses confer on an issue bearing on the guilt or innocence of the accused and about which they later testify. 703 S.W.2d at 667 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.