Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cloudgreen2 sentences2016Only after a determination has been made that the photographs have such value need the weighing be made.‖ 722 P.2d 750, 753 (Utah 1986) (citation omitted). ¶86 Later, in State v. Lafferty, this court created a test that we said would apply to ―certain categories of relevant evidence‖ with ―an unusually strong propensity to unfairly prejudice, inflame, or mislead a jury.‖ 749 P.2d at 1256 . 2016Only after a determination has been made that the photographs have such value need the weighing be made.‖ 722 P.2d 750, 753 (Utah 1986) (citation omitted). ¶86 Later, in State v. Lafferty, this court created a test that we said would apply to ―certain categories of relevant evidence‖ with ―an unusually strong propensity to unfairly prejudice, inflame, or mislead a jury.‖ 749 P.2d at 1256 . | 2 | 2 |
Roxas v. Marcosgreen1 sentence2001"This doctrine prevents parties from `playing "fast and loose" with the court or blowing "hot and cold" during the course of litigation.'" Roxas v. Marcos, 89 Hawai`i 91, 969 P.2d 1209, 1242 (1998) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
MacMillen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.green2 sentences1985Robins Co., 217 Neb. 338 , 348 N.W.2d 869, 872 (1984), the court created an exception to the products liability statute of repose where the manufacturer fraudulently refused to warn of known hazards caused by the Daikon Shield. 10 . 1985Robins Co., 217 Neb. 338 , 348 N.W.2d 869, 872 (1984), the court created an exception to the products liability statute of repose where the manufacturer fraudulently refused to warn of known hazards caused by the Daikon Shield. 10 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lafferty
green
2 sentences2016Only after a determination has been made that the photographs have such value need the weighing be made.‖ 722 P.2d 750, 753 (Utah 1986) (citation omitted). ¶86 Later, in State v. Lafferty, this court created a test that we said would apply to ―certain categories of relevant evidence‖ with ―an unusually strong propensity to unfairly prejudice, inflame, or mislead a jury.‖ 749 P.2d at 1256 . 2016Only after a determination has been made that the photographs have such value need the weighing be made.‖ 722 P.2d 750, 753 (Utah 1986) (citation omitted). ¶86 Later, in State v. Lafferty, this court created a test that we said would apply to ―certain categories of relevant evidence‖ with ―an unusually strong propensity to unfairly prejudice, inflame, or mislead a jury.‖ 749 P.2d at 1256 . | 2 | 2016–2016 |
United States v. Leon
green
2 sentences1987In United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), however, the Court created an exception to blanket application of the exclusionary rule. 1987In United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), however, the Court created an exception to blanket application of the exclusionary rule. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins
green
2 sentences1985In Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 94 , 100 S.Ct. 2035, 2047 , 64 L.Ed.2d 741 (1980), Justice Marshall, in a concurring opinion, suggested that a reasonable alternative remedy must be provided when "core” common-law rights are abolished. 1985In Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 94 , 100 S.Ct. 2035, 2047 , 64 L.Ed.2d 741 (1980), Justice Marshall, in a concurring opinion, suggested that a reasonable alternative remedy must be provided when "core” common-law rights are abolished. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.