Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cantugreen2 sentences2010In doing so, "trial courts [need to] 'undertake a sensitive inquiry into such circumstantial and direct evidence of intent as may be available." State v. Pharris, 846 P.2d 454, 461 (Utah Ct.App.) (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 93 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 ) (additional citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 857 P.2d 948 (Utah 1998). [T}he presence of one or more of [the following] factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) fai 2010In doing so, "trial courts [need to] `undertake a sensitive inquiry into such circumstantial and direct evidence of intent as may be available.'" State v. Pharris, 846 P.2d 454, 461 (Utah Ct. App.) (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 93 ) (additional citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 857 P.2d 948 (Utah 1993). [T]he presence of one or more of [the following] factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) failure to examine | 3 | 3 |
State v. Pharrisgreen2 sentences2010In doing so, "trial courts [need to] 'undertake a sensitive inquiry into such circumstantial and direct evidence of intent as may be available." State v. Pharris, 846 P.2d 454, 461 (Utah Ct.App.) (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 93 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 ) (additional citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 857 P.2d 948 (Utah 1998). [T}he presence of one or more of [the following] factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) fai 2010In doing so, "trial courts [need to] `undertake a sensitive inquiry into such circumstantial and direct evidence of intent as may be available.'" State v. Pharris, 846 P.2d 454, 461 (Utah Ct. App.) (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 93 ) (additional citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 857 P.2d 948 (Utah 1993). [T]he presence of one or more of [the following] factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) failure to examine | 2 | 3 |
Batson v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences2010In doing so, "trial courts [need to] 'undertake a sensitive inquiry into such circumstantial and direct evidence of intent as may be available." State v. Pharris, 846 P.2d 454, 461 (Utah Ct.App.) (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 93 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 ) (additional citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 857 P.2d 948 (Utah 1998). [T}he presence of one or more of [the following] factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) fai 2010In doing so, "trial courts [need to] 'undertake a sensitive inquiry into such circumstantial and direct evidence of intent as may be available." State v. Pharris, 846 P.2d 454, 461 (Utah Ct.App.) (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 93 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 ) (additional citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 857 P.2d 948 (Utah 1998). [T}he presence of one or more of [the following] factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) fai | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bowman
green
1 sentence2002During this inquiry, the trial court should examine the following factors to determine the legitimacy of the prosecutor's explanation: "(1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) failure to examine the juror or perfunctory examination assuming neither the trial court nor opposing counsel had questioned the juror, (8) singling the juror out for special questioning designed to evoke a certain response, (4) the prosecutor's reason is unrelated to the facts of the case, and (5) a challenge based on reasons equally applicable to juror[s] who were not challenged." Bo | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Harrison
green
1 sentence1993Harrison, 805 P.2d at 778 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Brown v. Merlo
green
2 sentences1989The court demanded not only that the enactment might tend to serve some conceivable legislative purpose, but also that each classification bear a fair and substantial relationship to a legitimate purpose. ( Id., at p. 861, 106 Cal. Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 .) The guest statute failed to pass this level of scrutiny since the classification of all automobile guests bore an insufficiently precise relation to the asserted purposes. 1989The court demanded not only that the enactment might tend to serve some conceivable legislative purpose, but also that each classification bear a fair and substantial relationship to a legitimate purpose. ( Id., at p. 861, 106 Cal. Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 .) The guest statute failed to pass this level of scrutiny since the classification of all automobile guests bore an insufficiently precise relation to the asserted purposes. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.