5 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. City of Seattlegreen2 sentences2014See Jones v. City of Seattle, 179 Wn.2d 322, 345 , 314 P.3d 380 (2014) (willfulness is not established by the mere fact of violation of a court order or discovery rule, "[sjomething more is needed.") However, the findings of substantial prejudice and consideration of lesser sanctions do not demonstrate that the court imposed default as a sanction following a "meaningful inquiry" into the effect of Northwest's conduct and whether any other sanction could compensate La Rosa. 2014See Jones v. City of Seattle, 179 Wn.2d 322, 345 , 314 P.3d 380 (2014) (willfulness is not established by the mere fact of violation of a court order or discovery rule, "[sjomething more is needed.") However, the findings of substantial prejudice and consideration of lesser sanctions do not demonstrate that the court imposed default as a sanction following a "meaningful inquiry" into the effect of Northwest's conduct and whether any other sanction could compensate La Rosa. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Blazina
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2018Id. | 4 | 2015–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.