7 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See, e.g., Walker v. State, 292 Ga. 262, 264-265 (2) ( 737 SE2d 311 ) (2013) (“Where, as here, the record reflects that the trial court applied an incorrect standard of review and, in so doing, failed to exercise its discretion and weigh the evidence in ruling on the merits of claims under OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21, the appellate court must vacate the judgment and remand the case to the trial court for consideration of the motion under the proper standard of review.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Ward v. State, 353 Ga. App. 1 , 13 (3) ( 836 SE2d 148 ) (2019) (“When a trial court conside 2025See, e.g., Walker v. State, 292 Ga. 262, 264-265 (2) ( 737 SE2d 311 ) (2013) (“Where, as here, the record reflects that the trial court applied an incorrect standard of review and, in so doing, failed to exercise its discretion and weigh the evidence in ruling on the merits of claims under OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21, the appellate court must vacate the judgment and remand the case to the trial court for consideration of the motion under the proper standard of review.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); Ward v. State, 353 Ga. App. 1 , 13 (3) ( 836 SE2d 148 ) (2019) (“When a trial court conside | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of A. S.green1 sentence2020See In the Interest of A. S., 293 Ga. App. at 713 (2) (finding no waiver where statement “affirmatively show[ed] that the trial court applied a standard of proof other than beyond a reasonable doubt” and noting that a “substantial error in [a] jury charge lowering the State’s burden of proof is not waived”). 2 The effect of the trial court’s error is not ameliorated by In the Interest of J. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Flores-Gallegosgreen2 sentences2019See generally State v. Flores-Gallegos, 337 Ga. App. 79, 82 ( 785 SE2d 911 ) (2016) (vacating judgment and remanding case for the trial court to consider a motion to suppress under the proper standard). 2019See generally State v. Flores-Gallegos, 337 Ga. App. 79, 82 ( 785 SE2d 911 ) (2016) (vacating judgment and remanding case for the trial court to consider a motion to suppress under the proper standard). | 1 | 1 |
Sanchez v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Sanchez v. State, 234 Ga. App. 809, 811 (3) ( 508 SE2d 185 ) (1998). 2005Sanchez v. State, 234 Ga. App. 809, 811 (3) ( 508 SE2d 185 ) (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Yopp v. Stategreen2 sentences1986See Yopp v. State, 131 Ga. 593, 598 ( 62 SE 1036 ); Ward v. State, 39 Ga. App. 570 (147 *801 SE 780). 1986See Yopp v. State, 131 Ga. 593, 598 ( 62 SE 1036 ); Ward v. State, 39 Ga. App. 570 (147 *801 SE 780). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Smithgreen2 sentences1976Jerdine v. State, 137 Ga. App. 811, 813 (2) (5) ( 224 SE2d 803 ); Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 560, 561 (7) ( 156 SE2d 901 ); Pippin v. *359 State, 205 Ga. 316, 317 (6) ( 53 SE2d 482 ). 5. 1976Jerdine v. State, 137 Ga. App. 811, 813 (2) (5) ( 224 SE2d 803 ); Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 560, 561 (7) ( 156 SE2d 901 ); Pippin v. *359 State, 205 Ga. 316, 317 (6) ( 53 SE2d 482 ). 5. | 1 | 1 |
Pippin v. Stategreen2 sentences1976Jerdine v. State, 137 Ga. App. 811, 813 (2) (5) ( 224 SE2d 803 ); Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 560, 561 (7) ( 156 SE2d 901 ); Pippin v. *359 State, 205 Ga. 316, 317 (6) ( 53 SE2d 482 ). 5. 1976Jerdine v. State, 137 Ga. App. 811, 813 (2) (5) ( 224 SE2d 803 ); Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 560, 561 (7) ( 156 SE2d 901 ); Pippin v. *359 State, 205 Ga. 316, 317 (6) ( 53 SE2d 482 ). 5. | 1 | 1 |
Jerdine v. Stategreen2 sentences1976Jerdine v. State, 137 Ga. App. 811, 813 (2) (5) ( 224 SE2d 803 ); Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 560, 561 (7) ( 156 SE2d 901 ); Pippin v. *359 State, 205 Ga. 316, 317 (6) ( 53 SE2d 482 ). 5. 1976Jerdine v. State, 137 Ga. App. 811, 813 (2) (5) ( 224 SE2d 803 ); Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 560, 561 (7) ( 156 SE2d 901 ); Pippin v. *359 State, 205 Ga. 316, 317 (6) ( 53 SE2d 482 ). 5. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Flanagan v. State
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 600-601 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Harris v. State
neutral
1 sentence1986See Yopp v. State, 131 Ga. 593, 598 ( 62 SE 1036 ); Ward v. State, 39 Ga. App. 570 (147 *801 SE 780). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.