denial of a peremptory challenge (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

denial of a peremptory challenge in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Birdgreen
washctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013Based on the violation ofthis right, the court granted Vreen a new trial. !d. at 671; accord State v. Bird, 136 Wn.

11
Batson v. Kentuckygreen
scotus · 1986 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000It has been said that the peremptory challenge “occupies ‘an important position in our trial procedures,’ Batson, 476 U.S. at 98 [ 106 S. Ct. at 1724 ], and has indeed been considered ‘a necessary part of trial by jury,’ Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. [202,] 219 [, 85 S. Ct. 824 ,] 835[, 13 L.

2000It has been said that the peremptory challenge “occupies ‘an important position in our trial procedures,’ Batson, 476 U.S. at 98 [ 106 S. Ct. at 1724 ], and has indeed been considered ‘a necessary part of trial by jury,’ Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. [202,] 219 [, 85 S. Ct. 824 ,] 835[, 13 L.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Richard Annigoni red
ca9 · 1996
2 sentences

2001"To subject the denial of a peremptory challenge to harmless-error analysis would require appellate courts to do the impossible: to reconstruct what went on in jury deliberations through nothing more than post-trial hearings and sheer speculation." Id.

2001“To subject the denial of a peremptory challenge to harmless-error analysis would require appellate courts to do the impossible: to reconstruct what went on in jury deliberations through nothing more than post-trial hearings and sheer speculation.” Id.

22001–2001
State v. Vreen green
washctapp · 2000
1 sentence

2013It concluded that “[although the denial of a peremptory challenge may not be an issue of constitutional dimension, it is, nevertheless, an important right.” Id.

12013–2013
Swain v. Alabama red
scotus · 1965
2 sentences

2000It has been said that the peremptory challenge “occupies ‘an important position in our trial procedures,’ Batson, 476 U.S. at 98 [ 106 S. Ct. at 1724 ], and has indeed been considered ‘a necessary part of trial by jury,’ Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. [202,] 219 [, 85 S. Ct. 824 ,] 835[, 13 L.

2000It has been said that the peremptory challenge “occupies ‘an important position in our trial procedures,’ Batson, 476 U.S. at 98 [ 106 S. Ct. at 1724 ], and has indeed been considered ‘a necessary part of trial by jury,’ Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. [202,] 219 [, 85 S. Ct. 824 ,] 835[, 13 L.

12000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.150 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MS 12 (1997–2010) LA 12 (1986–2024) CA 7 (1988–2020) MI 6 (2005–2023) AK 5 (1988–2008) WA 5 (2000–2013) IL 3 (1998–2009) SC 2 (1999–2006) FL 2 (2001–2003) ID 2 (2021–2021) NJ 2 (1987–1988)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check