Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
37 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Willard v. Paracelsus Health Care Corp.green2 sentences1999On remand, the trial court may consider the submission of a punitive damages instruction based on the independent tort of retaliatory discharge. 681 So.2d at 543 . ¶ 25. 1996In Willard v. Paracelsus Health Care Corp., 681 So.2d 539 (Miss.1996), this Court unanimously found that where two employees of a community hospital were discharged contrary to terms of the employee handbook and policy and procedures manual, in addition to a punitive damages instruction on the former employees’ charges of retaliatory discharge, the jury further should have been instructed on damages for tortious breach of contract: It is possible that a reasonable jury could find an intentional wrong here necessitating the imposition of punitive damages. | 3 | 7 |
McQueen Contracting, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Cross-Appelleegreen2 sentences1999McQueen Contracting, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 871 F.2d 32, 34 (5th Cir.1989) (wherein the Court affirmed dismissal of a punitive damages claim against a surety regarding a payment and performance bond). 1999McQueen Contracting, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 871 F.2d 32, 34 (5 th Cir.1989) (wherein the Court affirmed dismissal of a punitive damages claim against a surety regarding a payment and performance bond). | 3 | 3 |
Hill v. Dunawaygreen2 sentences1999Willard v. Paracelsus Health Care Corp., 681 So.2d 539, 543 (Miss.1996) ( quoting Hill v. Dunaway, 487 So.2d 807, 809 (Miss. 1986) (citations omitted)). 1999Willard v. Paracelsus Health Care Corp., 681 So.2d 539, 543 (Miss.1996) (quoting Hill v. Dunaway, 487 So.2d 807, 809 (Miss.1986) (citations omitted)). | 3 | 3 |
Bradfield v. Schwartzgreen2 sentences2009However, the Swarek’s addition of a punitive-damages claim, which is an extraordinary remedy not favored in Mississippi law, Bradfield v. Schwartz, 936 So.2d 931, 936 (Miss.2006), does not outweigh their request for specific performance, which is recognized as a traditional and appropriate remedy for the wrong alleged. 2009However, the Swarek's addition of a punitive-damages claim, which is an extraordinary remedy not favored in Mississippi law, Bradfield v. Schwartz, 936 So.2d 931, 936 (Miss.2006), does not outweigh their request for specific performance, which is recognized as a traditional and appropriate remedy for the wrong alleged. | 2 | 2 |
Jenkins v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.green2 sentences2008See, e.g., Jenkins, 794 So.2d at 232 -33 (citing State Farm Mut. 2008See, e.g., Jenkins, 794 So.2d at 232 -33 (citing State Farm Mut. | 2 | 2 |
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Whitegreen2 sentences2006The trial court denied the request, ruling as follows: This Court under [Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Hawkins] Hawkins v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, [ 830 So.2d 1162 (Miss.2002)], as well as Illinois Central Railroad Company v. White, [ 610 So.2d 308, 320 (Miss.1992)], finds that the actions of the Illinois Central Railroad Company amounts to that of ordinary negligence and that of gross negligence, and there has been no evidence of any aggression on the part of Illinois Central. 2003The trial court denied the request, ruling as follows: This Court under Hawkins v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, [ 830 So. 2d 1162 (Miss. 2002)], as well as Illinois Central Railroad Company v. White, [ 610 So. 2d 308, 320 (Miss. 1992)], finds that the actions of the Illinois Central Railroad Company amounts to that of ordinary negligence and that of gross negligence, and there has been no evidence of any aggression on the part of Illinois Central. | 2 | 2 |
Weems v. American SEC. Ins. Co.green2 sentences2006Co., 486 So.2d 1222 (Miss.1986), this Court expressly clarified the relationship between a bad faith claim and a punitive damages claim when we stated, "we wish to make it clear that the substantive rule breach of which may subject a party to an assessment of punitive damages is the same in bad faith refusal cases as in any others." Weems, 486 So.2d at 1226 (citations omitted). 2006Co., 486 So.2d 1222 (Miss.1986), this Court expressly clarified the relationship between a bad faith claim and a punitive damages claim when we stated, "we wish to make it clear that the substantive rule breach of which may subject a party to an assessment of punitive damages is the same in bad faith refusal cases as in any others." Weems, 486 So.2d at 1226 (citations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Colonial Mortg. Co., Inc. v. Leegreen2 sentences2004In Colonial Mortgage Co. v. Lee, 525 So.2d 804, 807-08 (Miss.1988), this Court, held that when a trial court is faced with the decision whether to grant a punitive damages instruction "[t]he question is whether there is a sufficient evidentiary basis to warrant the instruction, i.e., is the evidence sufficiently disputed that a jury issue has been made?" The test to determine this is as follows: The test is the same when the propriety of the instruction is tested via post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. 2001In Colonial Mortgage Co. v. Lee, 525 So.2d 804, 807-08 (Miss. 1988), this Court held that when a trial court is faced with the decision whether to grant a punitive damages instruction “[t]he question is whether there is a sufficient evidentiary basis to warrant the instruction, i.e., is the evidence sufficiently disputed that a jury issue has been made?” The test to determine this is as follows: The test is the same when the propriety of the instruction is tested via post- trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. | 2 | 2 |
Walker v. Browngreen2 sentences2003Walker v. Brown, 501 So.2d 358, 363 (Miss.1989). 2000Walker v. Brown, 501 So. 2d 358, 363 (Miss. 1989). | 2 | 2 |
Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Veasleygreen2 sentences2002Co. v. Veasley, 610 So.2d 290, 295 (Miss.1992)). 1992Co. v. Veasley, 610 So. 2d 290, 295 (Miss. 1992)). | 2 | 2 |
Garner v. Hickmangreen2 sentences2002This Court has previously found that "[i]n cases involving insurance contracts, we have found that extra-contractual damages such as attorney fees may be warranted even where the facts are not such to support a punitive damages claim." Garner v. Hickman, 733 So.2d 191, 198 (Miss.1999) (citing Universal Life Ins. 1992This Court has previously found that "[i]n cases involving insurance contracts, we have found that extra-contractual damages such as attorney fees may be warranted even where the facts are not such to support a punitive damages claim." Garner v. Hickman, 733 So. 2d 191, 198 (Miss. 1999) (citing Universal Life Ins. | 2 | 2 |
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Miss. v. Campbellgreen2 sentences1998Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi, Inc. v. Campbell, 466 So.2d 833, 843 (Miss.1984). 1995Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi, Inc. v. Campbell, 466 So. 2d 833, 843 (Miss. 1984). | 2 | 2 |
Paymaster Oil Mill Company v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences1988See Life Insurance Company of Mississippi v. Allen, 518 So.2d at 1193 ; Mississippi Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Todd, 492 So.2d 919, 933 (Miss. 1986); see generally Maxwell v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, 513 So.2d 901, 905 (Miss. 1987); Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc., 464 So.2d 47, 54 (Miss. 1985); Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975). 1987See Scott v. Transport Indemnity Co., 513 So.2d at 897 ; Mississippi Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Todd, 492 So.2d 919, 933 (Miss. 1986); see generally Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc., 464 So.2d 47, 54 (Miss. 1985); Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975). | 2 | 2 |
Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc.green2 sentences1988See Life Insurance Company of Mississippi v. Allen, 518 So.2d at 1193 ; Mississippi Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Todd, 492 So.2d 919, 933 (Miss. 1986); see generally Maxwell v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, 513 So.2d 901, 905 (Miss. 1987); Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc., 464 So.2d 47, 54 (Miss. 1985); Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975). 1987See Scott v. Transport Indemnity Co., 513 So.2d at 897 ; Mississippi Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Todd, 492 So.2d 919, 933 (Miss. 1986); see generally Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc., 464 So.2d 47, 54 (Miss. 1985); Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975). | 2 | 2 |
Mississippi Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Toddgreen2 sentences1988See Life Insurance Company of Mississippi v. Allen, 518 So.2d at 1193 ; Mississippi Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Todd, 492 So.2d 919, 933 (Miss. 1986); see generally Maxwell v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad, 513 So.2d 901, 905 (Miss. 1987); Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc., 464 So.2d 47, 54 (Miss. 1985); Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975). 1987See Scott v. Transport Indemnity Co., 513 So.2d at 897 ; Mississippi Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Todd, 492 So.2d 919, 933 (Miss. 1986); see generally Stubblefield v. Jesco, Inc., 464 So.2d 47, 54 (Miss. 1985); Paymaster Oil Mill Co. v. Mitchell, 319 So.2d 652, 657 (Miss. 1975). | 2 | 2 |
Dixie Ins. Co. v. Mooneyhangreen2 sentences2007Nevertheless, United failed to cite the very next sentence which held, "However, this Court has, in recent cases, backed away from a blanket holding that a punitive damages instruction should be not submitted to the jury if a directed verdict was denied on the underlying contract." Grimes further held, "This Court in [ Dixie Insurance v.] Mooneyhan[, 684 So.2d 574 (Miss.1996) ], thus noted that a judge may validly conclude that an insurer lacked an arguable reason to deny the claim and that it acted in bad faith notwithstanding the fact that he refused a directed verdict on the underlying cont 2007Nevertheless, United failed to cite the very next sentence which held, "However, this Court has, in recent cases, backed away from a blanket holding that a punitive damages instruction should be not submitted to the jury if a directed verdict was denied on the underlying contract." Grimes further held, "This Court in [ Dixie Insurance v.] Mooneyhan[, 684 So.2d 574 (Miss.1996) ], thus noted that a judge may validly conclude that an insurer lacked an arguable reason to deny the claim and that it acted in bad faith notwithstanding the fact that he refused a directed verdict on the underlying cont | 1 | 3 |
Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. McGeegreen2 sentences1990Reserve Life, 444 So.2d at 809 . 1984We now seek to clarify and reiterate our Reserve Life holding. [4] In one of these special circumstance cases where the trial court determines that even though there is a factual issue on liability under the policy, a punitive damages instruction based upon bad faith is also proper, the trial court might consider, as Justice Robertson in his special concurring opinion in Reserve Life, 444 So.2d 803, p. 818 (Miss. 1983), suggested submitting under Rule 49(b) M.R.C.P. the issue of liability to the jury first, and if the jury finds for the plaintiff, then submitting the issue of punitive damages | 1 | 2 |
McKee v. McKeegreen1 sentence2021Thus, Cascio has been ordered to pay $321,045.49 in attorneys’ fees and expenses without an explanation, analysis, or justification based on the factors in McKee v. McKee, 418 So. 2d 764, 767 (Miss. 1982), or Rule 1.5(a) of the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct. | 1 | 1 |
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grimesgreen1 sentence2005Nevertheless, United failed to cite the very next sentence which held, “However, this Court has, in recent cases, backed away from a blanket holding that a punitive damages instruction should be not submitted to the jury if a directed verdict was denied on the underlying contract.” Grimes further held, “This Court in [Dixie Insurance v.] Mooneyhan, thus noted that a judge may validly conclude that an insurer lacked an arguable reason to deny the claim and that it acted in bad faith notwithstanding the fact that he refused a directed verdict on the underlying contract claim.” Id. at 640 (emphas | 1 | 1 |
| Life Ins. Co. of Mississippi v. Allengreen | 1 | 1 |
| Maxwell v. Illinois Central Gulf RRgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Scott v. Transport Indem. Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Griffin v. Warered | 1 | 1 |
| Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. Hollandgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Standard Life Ins. Co. of Indiana v. Veal
green
2 sentences1984After deciding the threshold question of whether or not it is a jury question on the issue of legitimate or arguable reason to deny or cancel, the trial court then should make a determination as to whether or not the evidence is sufficient to submit a punitive damages instruction to the jury under the guidelines set out in Veal, supra. 444 So.2d at 810 . (a) The problem here lies in Step Three's suggestion that the question of whether the punitive damages issue goes to the jury are "the guidelines set out in Veal, supra. " 444 So.2d at 810 . 1984After deciding the threshold question of whether or not it is a jury question on the issue of legitimate or arguable reason to deny or cancel, the trial court then should make a determination as to whether or not the evidence is sufficient to submit a punitive damages instruction to the jury under the guidelines set out in Veal, supra. 444 So.2d at 810 . (a) The problem here lies in Step Three's suggestion that the question of whether the punitive damages issue goes to the jury are "the guidelines set out in Veal, supra. " 444 So.2d at 810 . | 3 | 1983–1984 |
Osborne v. Bullins
green
2 sentences2009Osborne, 549 So.2d at 1340 . 2009Osborne, 549 So.2d at 1340 . | 2 | 2007–2009 |
cluster 28448
green
2 sentences2008Martin argued in response that there was no arguable basis for USF & G's denial of her claim, and that USF & G "committed a willful or malicious wrong, or acted with gross or reckless disregard." Sobley v. S. Natural Gas Co., 302 F.3d 325 (5th Cir.2002). ¶ 47. 2008Martin argued in response that there was no arguable basis for USF & G’s denial of her claim, and that USF & G “committed a willful or malicious wrong, or acted with gross or reckless disregard.” Sobley v. S. Natural Gas Co., 302 F.3d 325 (5th Cir.2002). ¶47. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Hawkins
green
2 sentences2006The trial court denied the request, ruling as follows: This Court under [Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Hawkins] Hawkins v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, [ 830 So.2d 1162 (Miss.2002)], as well as Illinois Central Railroad Company v. White, [ 610 So.2d 308, 320 (Miss.1992)], finds that the actions of the Illinois Central Railroad Company amounts to that of ordinary negligence and that of gross negligence, and there has been no evidence of any aggression on the part of Illinois Central. 2003The trial court denied the request, ruling as follows: This Court under Hawkins v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, [ 830 So. 2d 1162 (Miss. 2002)], as well as Illinois Central Railroad Company v. White, [ 610 So. 2d 308, 320 (Miss. 1992)], finds that the actions of the Illinois Central Railroad Company amounts to that of ordinary negligence and that of gross negligence, and there has been no evidence of any aggression on the part of Illinois Central. | 2 | 2003–2006 |
H. H. Henderson, Dwaine Lee Henderson, Cross v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Cross
green
2 sentences1983After deciding the threshold question of whether or not it is a jury question on the issue of legitimate or arguable reason to deny or cancel, the trial court then should make a determination as to whether or not the evidence is sufficient to submit a punitive damages instruction to the jury under the guidelines set out in Veal, supra. A case similar to the above holding is shown by the opinion in Henderson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 620 F.2d 530 (5th Cir.1980). 1983If Henderson’s position is accepted, UFSF & G’s act in hiding the policy render ineffectual any other defense it had to the punitive damages claim. ( 620 F.2d at 537 ). | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Wetherbee
green
1 sentence2004Travelers, 368 So.2d at 834 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
American Funeral Assur. Co. v. Hubbs
green
1 sentence1998As noted by the majority, many trial judges have a natural inclination to permit a jury to reach a decision on the merits of the case rather than rendering judgment themselves, and this Court should not place undue importance on the judge's ruling on the directed verdict issue. [3] See American Funeral Assurance Co. v. Hubbs, 700 So.2d 283 (Miss.1997). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Maas
green
1 sentence1996Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 516 So. 2d at 497 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Jett Drilling Co. v. Jones
green
2 sentences1995Jett Drilling, 251 Miss. at 339 , 169 So.2d at 465 . 1995Jett Drilling, 251 Miss. at 339 , 169 So.2d at 465 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Andrew Jackson Life Ins. Co. v. Williams
green
1 sentence1993Id. at 1177 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Fedders Corp. v. Boatright
green
2 sentences1988In Fedders Corp. v. Boatwright, 493 So.2d 301 (Miss. 1986), also involving a breach of express and implied warranties claim on consumer goods, a punitive damages instruction was given, and the jury awarded punitive damages in the amount of $20,000. 1988Id. at 306 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Brewer v. Home-Stake Production Co. green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.