enjoyment privilege (Oklahoma) · Go Syfert
← Oklahoma issues

enjoyment privilege in Oklahoma

6 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1912–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Crockett, Secy. of State v. Salt Lake County neutral
utah · 1928
2 sentences

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

21934–1945
Lutz, Atty.-Gen. v. Arnold, Atty. Tr. green
ind · 1935
1 sentence

2003Under Oklahoma law, real property for ad valorem taxation purposes is assessed annually at its fair cash value, which is estimated at the price it would bring at a fair voluntary sale for either (1) the highest and best use for which it was actually used during the preceding calendar year; or (2) the highest and best use for which it was last classified if not actually used during the preceding calendar year. 68 O.S.2001 § 2817(B)(1), (2). 3 ¶ 10 An excise tax, on the other hand, is “[a] tax imposed on the performance of an act, the engaging in an occupation, or the enjoyment of a privilege.”

12003–2003
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. McFarlan green
nj · 1881
1 sentence

1961Co. v. McFarlan, 43 N.J.L. 605 , as follows: “Protests and remonstrances by the owner of the servient tenement against the use of the easement, rather add to the strength of the claim of a prescriptive right; for a holding in defiance of such expostulations is demonstrative proof that the enjoyment is under a claim of right, hostile and adverse; and if they be not accompanied by acts amounting to a disturbance of the right in a legal sense, they are not interruptions or obstructions of the enjoyment.” In view of the undisputed protestations of Mrs. Whelan, during the prescriptive period, indic

11961–1961
People Ex Rel. Lindstrand v. Emmerson green
ill · 1929
2 sentences

1956Lindstrand v. Emmerson, 333 Ill. 606 , 165 N.E. 217 , 62 A.L.R. 912 , and Littlejohn v. People, 52 Colo. 217 , 121 P. 159 , 161, Ann.Cas.1913D, 610.

1956Lindstrand v. Emmerson, 333 Ill. 606 , 165 N.E. 217 , 62 A.L.R. 912 , and Littlejohn v. People, 52 Colo. 217 , 121 P. 159 , 161, Ann.Cas.1913D, 610.

11956–1956
Littlejohn v. People green
colo · 1912
2 sentences

1956Lindstrand v. Emmerson, 333 Ill. 606 , 165 N.E. 217 , 62 A.L.R. 912 , and Littlejohn v. People, 52 Colo. 217 , 121 P. 159 , 161, Ann.Cas.1913D, 610.

1956Lindstrand v. Emmerson, 333 Ill. 606 , 165 N.E. 217 , 62 A.L.R. 912 , and Littlejohn v. People, 52 Colo. 217 , 121 P. 159 , 161, Ann.Cas. 1913D, 610.

11956–1956
Independent School District, Class A, No. 1 v. Pfost green
idaho · 1931
2 sentences

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

11945–1945
Wiseman v. Phillips green
ark · 1935
1 sentence

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

11945–1945
Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie green
ark · 1922
1 sentence

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

11945–1945
Portland v. Kozer green
or · 1923
2 sentences

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

1945(See Independent School District v. Pfost, 51 Idaho, 240 , 4 P. 2d 893 , 84 A.L.R. 820 ; Crockett v. Salt Lake County, 72 Utah, 337 , 270 P. 142 , 60 A.L.R. 867 ; Portland v. Kozer, 108 Ore. 375 , 217 P. 833 ; Standard Oil Co. v. Brodie, 153 Ark. 114 , 239’ S.W. 753; Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63, 84 .

11945–1945
Ladd v. Holmes green
or · 1901
2 sentences

1912Ladd v. Holmes, 40 Or. 167 , 66 Pac. 714 , 91 Am.

1912Ladd v. Holmes, 40 Or. 167 , 66 Pac. 714 , 91 Am.

11912–1912

Where else courts name it

MD 14 (1925–2024) IN 12 (1893–2008) MI 10 (1921–2014) OH 9 (1892–2025) GA 8 (1910–2025) NY 6 (1857–1958) OK 6 (1912–2003) WA 6 (1976–2015) NM 5 (1938–2015) PA 4 (1936–1977) MA 4 (1932–1995) CO 4 (1983–1998) KS 4 (1973–2017) LA 3 (1938–2018) MO 3 (1933–2018) NC 3 (1915–1939) CA 3 (1902–1953) AR 2 (1915–1956) OR 2 (1901–1992) IL 2 (1890–1987) IA 2 (1942–2002) TN 2 (1923–2020) VA 2 (1880–1881) ME 2 (1957–1985) MN 2 (2013–2014) SD 2 (1944–1959) MT 2 (1964–1979) KY 2 (1927–1971)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check