Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1906–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pendleton v. Millsgreen1 sentence2012Co., 71 S .W.3d 691, 696 (Tenn. 2002); Marceaux v. Thompson, 212 S.W.3d 263, 266 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006); Pendleton v. Mills, 73 S.W.3d 115, 120 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). | 1 | 1 |
Marceaux v. Thompsongreen1 sentence2012Co., 71 S .W.3d 691, 696 (Tenn. 2002); Marceaux v. Thompson, 212 S.W.3d 263, 266 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006); Pendleton v. Mills, 73 S.W.3d 115, 120 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Allengreen1 sentence2002Nonperformance of a promise in accordance with its terms is excused if performance is prevented by the conduct of the adverse party.’ ”); State v. Allen, 21 Tenn. 258, 264 (1840)(“The defendant has become bound to the State of Tennessee, for the appearance of Allen. | 1 | 1 |
American City Bank of Tullahoma v. Western Auto Supply Co.green1 sentence1989In American City Bank v. Western Auto Supply, 631 S.W.2d 410, 423 (Tenn.App.1981), the Court of Appeals of this State expressed the view that, “the effectiveness of any financing statement as an instrument of priority is limited in that respect to the amount upon which the privilege tax is paid.” We consider that a sound statement of the law. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cates v. Reynolds
green
1 sentence2002Cates v. Reynolds, 228 S.W. 695 , 696 (Tenn. 1921) (citations omitted). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Ransom v. State
green
1 sentence1906In the case of Ransom v. State, 116 Tenn., 355 , 96 S. W., 953 , it is said: «The established rule of practice requires that it shall affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions that it contains all the evidence heard by the trial judge on any plea or motion presenting disputed or controverted facts.” In that case a motion was made to set aside and quash a venire, because the list from which the same was drawn contained the name of no men of color or of African descent, and the affidavits of nine individuals were sought to be brought to this court’s consideration as a part of the record i | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.