Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sawyergreen1 sentence2010The fact that Jones himself insisted on proceeding to trial reinforces our view that the circuit court's failure to sua sponte order a continuance on the day of trial did not "seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings." See Sawyer, 88 Hawai'iat 330, 966 P.2d at 642. | 1 | 1 |
Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.green2 sentences2007“Whereas in criminal cases a court has strong sua sponte duties to instruct the jury on a wide variety of subjects, a court in a civil case has no parallel responsibilities.” Mayes v. Bryan, 139 Cal.App.4th 1075, 1090 , 44 Cal.Rptr.3d 14, 23 (Cal.Ct.App.2006) (quoting Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1653 , 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525, 530 (1996)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2007“Whereas in criminal cases a court has strong sua sponte duties to instruct the jury on a wide variety of subjects, a court in a civil case has no parallel responsibilities.” Mayes v. Bryan, 139 Cal.App.4th 1075, 1090 , 44 Cal.Rptr.3d 14, 23 (Cal.Ct.App.2006) (quoting Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1653 , 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525, 530 (1996)) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Estate of Chinggreen2 sentences2007In re Mew Len Ching’s Estate, 46 Haw. 127, 129-30 , 376 P.2d 125, 127 (1962). 2007In re Mew Len Ching’s Estate, 46 Haw. 127, 129-30 , 376 P.2d 125, 127 (1962). | 1 | 1 |
Mayes v. Bryangreen2 sentences2007“Whereas in criminal cases a court has strong sua sponte duties to instruct the jury on a wide variety of subjects, a court in a civil case has no parallel responsibilities.” Mayes v. Bryan, 139 Cal.App.4th 1075, 1090 , 44 Cal.Rptr.3d 14, 23 (Cal.Ct.App.2006) (quoting Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1653 , 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525, 530 (1996)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2007“Whereas in criminal cases a court has strong sua sponte duties to instruct the jury on a wide variety of subjects, a court in a civil case has no parallel responsibilities.” Mayes v. Bryan, 139 Cal.App.4th 1075, 1090 , 44 Cal.Rptr.3d 14, 23 (Cal.Ct.App.2006) (quoting Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1653 , 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525, 530 (1996)) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nichols
green
2 sentences2018This court qualified the invited error doctrine in State v. Nichols , holding that the general rule is inapplicable "where an invited error is so prejudicial as to be plain error or to constitute ineffective assistance of counsel." 111 Hawai'i 327 , 339 n.7, 141 P.3d 974 , 986 n.7 (2006) (citations omitted). 2018This court qualified the invited error doctrine in State v. Nichols , holding that the general rule is inapplicable "where an invited error is so prejudicial as to be plain error or to constitute ineffective assistance of counsel." 111 Hawai'i 327 , 339 n.7, 141 P.3d 974 , 986 n.7 (2006) (citations omitted). | 2 | 2010–2018 |
Kealoha v. Tanaka
green
2 sentences2007With respect to jury instructions in civil cases, the invited error doctrine applies with “full force and effect.” Kealoha, 45 Haw. at 462 , 370 P.2d at 471 . 2007With respect to jury instructions in civil cases, the invited error doctrine applies with “full force and effect.” Kealoha, 45 Haw. at 462 , 370 P.2d at 471 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2006Smith, 68 Haw. at 314 , 712 P.2d at 502 . 2006Smith, 68 Haw. at 314 , 712 P.2d at 502 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Pataray v. Lee Hing
neutral
1 sentence1962Pataray v. Lee Hing, 37 Haw. 14 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.