evidential force principle (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

evidential force principle in Illinois

33 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Marriage of Batesgreen
ill · 2004 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See also In re Marriage of Bates, 212 Ill. 2d 489, 518 , 819 N.E.2d 714, 729 (2004).

2006See also In re Marriage of Bates, 212 Ill. 2d 489, 518 , 819 N.E.2d 714, 729 (2004).

22
People v. Baynesgreen
ill · 1981 · cited in 3 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1989–1991
2 sentences

1991Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.’ 293 F. at 1014 , quoted with approval in People v. Baynes (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 225, 241 [, 430 N.E.2d 1070 ].” (Eyler, 133 Ill. 2d at 211 , 549 N.E.2d at 285 .) The determination whether the State has met this standard is pl

1991Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.’ 293 F. at 1014 , quoted with approval in People v. Baynes (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 225, 241 [, 430 N.E.2d 1070 ].” (Eyler, 133 Ill. 2d at 211 , 549 N.E.2d at 285 .) The determination whether the State has met this standard is pl

13
People v. Jordangreen
ill · 1984 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1988–1989
2 sentences

1989See also People v. Jordan (1984), 103 Ill.2d 192, 208 .

1989See also People v. Jordan (1984), 103 Ill. 2d 192, 208 .

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Frye v. United States red
cadc · 1923
2 sentences

2007Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while the courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye v. United States, 293 F. at 1014 .

2007Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while the courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye v. United States, 293 F. at 1014 .

301979–2007
People v. Buening green
illappct · 1992
2 sentences

2004In People v. Buening, 229 Ill.

2004In People v. Buening , 229 Ill.

22004–2004
Wilson v. Clark green
ill · 1981
1 sentence

1997The plaintiffs argue that Wilson v. Clark, 84 Ill. 2d 186 (1981), in which our supreme court adopted Rule 703 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, somehow supports their position.

11997–1997
People v. Miles green
illappct · 1991
1 sentence

1993(People v. Miles (1991), 217 Ill.

11993–1993
People v. Eyler green
ill · 1989
2 sentences

1991Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.’ 293 F. at 1014 , quoted with approval in People v. Baynes (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 225, 241 [, 430 N.E.2d 1070 ].” (Eyler, 133 Ill. 2d at 211 , 549 N.E.2d at 285 .) The determination whether the State has met this standard is pl

1991Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.’ 293 F. at 1014 , quoted with approval in People v. Baynes (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 225, 241 [, 430 N.E.2d 1070 ].” (Eyler, 133 Ill. 2d at 211 , 549 N.E.2d at 285 .) The determination whether the State has met this standard is pl

11991–1991
People v. Partee green
illappct · 1987
1 sentence

1989See also People v. Partee (1987), 157 Ill. App. 3d 231, 260 .

11989–1989
Robinson v. State green
mdctspecapp · 1981
2 sentences

1987After separation, the enzymes and their protein components can be identified and, in this way, the blood can be classified more specifically than is possible by traditional A, B, 0 blood grouping.” (Robinson v. State (1981), 47 Md. App. 558, 574 , 425 A.2d 211, 220 .) Electrophoresis has long been recognized as a reliable method of studying genetically determined differences between individuals and population.

1987After separation, the enzymes and their protein components can be identified and, in this way, the blood can be classified more specifically than is possible by traditional A, B, 0 blood grouping.” (Robinson v. State (1981), 47 Md. App. 558, 574 , 425 A.2d 211, 220 .) Electrophoresis has long been recognized as a reliable method of studying genetically determined differences between individuals and population.

11987–1987
State v. Valdez green
ariz · 1962
2 sentences

1981In State v. Valdez (1962), 91 Ariz. 274, 283 , 371 P.2d 894, 900 , the Arizona court found that the machine had “developed to a state in which its results are probative enough to warrant admissibility upon stipulation.” Polygraph evidence was found to be admissible provided: “(1) That the county attorney, defendant and his counsel all sign a written stipulation providing for defendant’s submission to the test and for the subsequent admission at trial of the graphs and the examiner’s opinion thereon on behalf of either defendant or the state. (2) That notwithstanding the stipulation the admissi

1981In State v. Valdez (1962), 91 Ariz. 274, 283 , 371 P.2d 894, 900 , the Arizona court found that the machine had “developed to a state in which its results are probative enough to warrant admissibility upon stipulation.” Polygraph evidence was found to be admissible provided: “(1) That the county attorney, defendant and his counsel all sign a written stipulation providing for defendant’s submission to the test and for the subsequent admission at trial of the graphs and the examiner’s opinion thereon on behalf of either defendant or the state. (2) That notwithstanding the stipulation the admissi

11981–1981

Where else courts name it

PA 35 (1977–2023) IL 33 (1979–2007) CA 16 (1957–2026) NY 12 (1988–2018) FL 11 (1983–2013) AL 8 (1980–2012) TX 7 (1973–1998) MO 7 (1972–2000) MD 7 (1977–2018) CT 6 (1986–1995) DC 5 (1979–2016) AZ 5 (1962–2006) WA 5 (1984–2013) CO 4 (1981–1999) MA 3 (1978–1986) MI 3 (1949–2014) AK 3 (1986–1997) WV 3 (1989–2002) RI 3 (1985–1999) NJ 3 (1978–2020) LA 3 (1981–1995) MS 3 (1994–1998) GA 2 (1981–2025) MN 2 (1971–1989) NM 2 (1993–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check