Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Frye v. United Statesred2 sentences2018Somewhere in this *891 twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs. *705 Id. at 1014 . 2002Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.” Frye v. United States, 54 App.D.C. 46 , 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C.Cir.1923). | 2 | 4 |
People v. Kellyyellow2 sentences1983In discussing the Frye standard in Reed , the Court quoted with approval from People v. Kelly, 17 Cal.3d 24, 31-32 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 144, 149 , 549 P.2d 1240, 1245 (1976): *709 "`... 1983In discussing the Frye standard in Reed , the Court quoted with approval from People v. Kelly, 17 Cal.3d 24, 31-32 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 144, 149 , 549 P.2d 1240, 1245 (1976): *709 "`... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Reed v. State
green
2 sentences1983Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs." In Reed , the Court did not find voiceprints to have gained "general acceptance in the particular field." 283 Md. at 399 , 391 A.2d at 377 . 1983Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs." In Reed , the Court did not find voiceprints to have gained "general acceptance in the particular field." 283 Md. at 399 , 391 A.2d at 377 . | 3 | 1978–2012 |
Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.
green
2 sentences2002The logical corollary of the Frye test’s focus on methodology rather than conclusions is that even unpopular conclusions are admissible so long as they are based upon generally accepted methodologies. *418 270 Kan. 443 , 14 P.3d 1170, 1182-83 . 2002The logical corollary of the Frye test’s focus on methodology rather than conclusions is that even unpopular conclusions are admissible so long as they are based upon generally accepted methodologies. *418 270 Kan. 443 , 14 P.3d 1170, 1182-83 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.