evidential force principle (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

evidential force principle in Arizona

5 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Frye v. United States red
cadc · 1923
2 sentences

2006Id.

1989Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs. 293 F. at 1014 . .

41989–2006
State v. Bohner green
wis · 1933
2 sentences

1962“We think the systolic blood pressure deception test has not yet gained such standing and scientific recognition among physiological and psychological authorities as would justify the courts in admitting expert testimony deduced from the discovery, development, and experiments thus far made.” 4 Ten years later the Supreme Court of Wisconsin reached the same result in State v. Bohner, 210 Wis. 651 , 246 N.W. 314 , 86 A.L.R. 611 (1933).

1962“We think the systolic blood pressure deception test has not yet gained such standing and scientific recognition among physiological and psychological authorities as would justify the courts in admitting expert testimony deduced from the discovery, development, and experiments thus far made.” 4 Ten years later the Supreme Court of Wisconsin reached the same result in State v. Bohner, 210 Wis. 651 , 246 N.W. 314 , 86 A.L.R. 611 (1933).

11962–1962

Where else courts name it

PA 35 (1977–2023) IL 33 (1979–2007) CA 16 (1957–2026) NY 12 (1988–2018) FL 11 (1983–2013) AL 8 (1980–2012) MO 7 (1972–2000) TX 7 (1973–1998) MD 7 (1977–2018) CT 6 (1986–1995) AZ 5 (1962–2006) WA 5 (1984–2013) DC 5 (1979–2016) CO 4 (1981–1999) AK 3 (1986–1997) MA 3 (1978–1986) MS 3 (1994–1998) MI 3 (1949–2014) RI 3 (1985–1999) WV 3 (1989–2002) LA 3 (1981–1995) NJ 3 (1978–2020) GA 2 (1981–2025) MN 2 (1971–1989) NM 2 (1993–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check