30 Massachusetts opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Katergreen2 sentences2018"A prosecutor may argue 'forcefully for a conviction based on the evidence and on inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.' Commonwealth v. Kozec , 399 Mass. 514 , 516 [ 505 N.E.2d 519 ] (1987). 'When a defendant raises a claim of error regarding a prosecutor's closing argument, we consider (1) whether the defendant seasonably objected; (2) whether the error was limited to collateral issues or went to the heart of the case; (3) what specific or general instructions the judge gave the jury which may have mitigated the mistake; and (4) whether the error, in the circumstances, p 2018"A prosecutor may argue 'forcefully for a conviction based on the evidence and on inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.' Commonwealth v. Kozec , 399 Mass. 514 , 516 [ 505 N.E.2d 519 ] (1987). 'When a defendant raises a claim of error regarding a prosecutor's closing argument, we consider (1) whether the defendant seasonably objected; (2) whether the error was limited to collateral issues or went to the heart of the case; (3) what specific or general instructions the judge gave the jury which may have mitigated the mistake; and (4) whether the error, in the circumstances, p | 3 | 5 |
Commonwealth v. Saferiangreen2 sentences2025To sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must show that "behavior of counsel [fell] measurably below that which might be expected from an ordinary fallible lawyer," and that such behavior "likely deprived the defendant of an otherwise available, substantial ground of [defense]." Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96 (1974). "[T]he preferred method for raising a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is through a motion 3 for a new trial." Commonwealth v. Zinser, 446 Mass. 807, 810 (2006). "[A]n ineffective assistance of counsel challenge made on the trial 2023Under the well-known Saferian standard, we ask whether there has been "serious incompetency, inefficiency, or inattention of counsel -- behavior of counsel falling measurably below that which might be expected from an ordinary fallible lawyer -- and, if that is found, then, typically, whether it has likely deprived the defendant of an otherwise available, substantial ground of defence." Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96 (1974). | 2 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Kozecgreen2 sentences2018"A prosecutor may argue 'forcefully for a conviction based on the evidence and on inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.' Commonwealth v. Kozec , 399 Mass. 514 , 516 [ 505 N.E.2d 519 ] (1987). 'When a defendant raises a claim of error regarding a prosecutor's closing argument, we consider (1) whether the defendant seasonably objected; (2) whether the error was limited to collateral issues or went to the heart of the case; (3) what specific or general instructions the judge gave the jury which may have mitigated the mistake; and (4) whether the error, in the circumstances, p 2018"A prosecutor may argue 'forcefully for a conviction based on the evidence and on inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.' Commonwealth v. Kozec , 399 Mass. 514 , 516 [ 505 N.E.2d 519 ] (1987). 'When a defendant raises a claim of error regarding a prosecutor's closing argument, we consider (1) whether the defendant seasonably objected; (2) whether the error was limited to collateral issues or went to the heart of the case; (3) what specific or general instructions the judge gave the jury which may have mitigated the mistake; and (4) whether the error, in the circumstances, p | 1 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Diazgreen2 sentences2017Commonwealth v. Diaz , 448 Mass. 286 , 289 (2007). 2012“Such an ineffective assistance claim is in its ‘weakest form’ because ‘it is bereft of any explanation by trial counsel for his actions and suggestive of strategy contrived by a defendant viewing the case with hindsight.’ ” Commonwealth v. Diaz, 448 Mass. 286, 289 (2007), quoting from Commonwealth v. Peloquin, 437 Mass. 204 , 210 n.5 (2002). “[T]he preferred method for raising a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is through a motion for a new trial,” where an appropriate factual record can be developed. | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Wardsworthgreen1 sentence2026Commonwealth v. Wardsworth, 482 Mass. 454, 478 (2019). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Kincaidgreen1 sentence2025See id. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Zinsergreen1 sentence2025To sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must show that "behavior of counsel [fell] measurably below that which might be expected from an ordinary fallible lawyer," and that such behavior "likely deprived the defendant of an otherwise available, substantial ground of [defense]." Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96 (1974). "[T]he preferred method for raising a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is through a motion 3 for a new trial." Commonwealth v. Zinser, 446 Mass. 807, 810 (2006). "[A]n ineffective assistance of counsel challenge made on the trial | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Santiagogreen1 sentence2023Finally, to the extent that the defendant raises a challenge to the judge's refusal to allow trial counsel to cross-examine the girlfriend about the victim's prior bad acts, based on her brief description of the victim as "a loving, kind guy," nothing about that aspect of the girlfriend's testimony "blew the door open on [the victim's] prior reputation," as defense counsel argued at trial. "[T]he prosecutor is entitled to tell the jury something of the person whose life ha[s] been 13 lost in order to humanize the proceedings." 12 Commonwealth v. Santiago, 425 Mass. 491, 495 (1997), S.C., 427 M | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hollidaygreen1 sentence2023See Commonwealth v. Holliday, 450 Mass. 794, 816 , cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Morsegreen1 sentence2023Where the defendant raises a claim that the evidence was insufficient to prove the defendant's violation of his probation by a preponderance of the evidence, we examine the record to determine whether it "discloses sufficient reliable evidence to warrant the findings by the judge." Commonwealth v. Morse, 50 Mass. App. Ct. 582, 594 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Cruzgreen1 sentence2018See id . at 144 , 99 N.E.3d 827 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. MacDonaldgreen2 sentences2018See United States v. MacDonald , 456 U.S. 1 , 7 n.7, 102 S.Ct. 1497 , 71 L.Ed.2d 696 (1982) ; Butler , 464 Mass. at 713 , 985 N.E.2d 377 . 2018See United States v. MacDonald , 456 U.S. 1 , 7 n.7, 102 S.Ct. 1497 , 71 L.Ed.2d 696 (1982) ; Butler , 464 Mass. at 713 , 985 N.E.2d 377 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Buswellgreen1 sentence2017See Commonwealth v. Buswell, 468 Mass. 92, 106 (2014); Mass. G. | 1 | 1 |
JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBgreen1 sentence2016See J.E.B. v. Alabama, 511 U.S. 127 (1994) (extending Batson to cover discrimination on the basis of gender). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Seniorgreen1 sentence2013“A challenge to the sufficiency of an indictment must be raised by a motion to dismiss prior to trial or it will be deemed waived, unless the defendant raises a claim that the court lacks jurisdiction or the indictment fails to charge an offense.” Commonwealth v. Senior, 454 Mass. 12, 14 (2009). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Lopesgreen1 sentence2005If the defense is “affirmative,” once a defendant raises the defense to a charge and the defense is supported by sufficient evidence, the defendant is entitled to have a jury instruction on the defense, and the Commonwealth has the burden of disproving the defense. 18 Cf. Commonwealth v. Lopes, 440 Mass. 731, 740 (2004) (self-defense in murder case); Commonwealth v. Epsom, 399 Mass. 254, 257 (1987) (same); Commonwealth v. Klein, supra at 831 (deadly force during citizen arrest). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Epsomgreen1 sentence2005If the defense is “affirmative,” once a defendant raises the defense to a charge and the defense is supported by sufficient evidence, the defendant is entitled to have a jury instruction on the defense, and the Commonwealth has the burden of disproving the defense. 18 Cf. Commonwealth v. Lopes, 440 Mass. 731, 740 (2004) (self-defense in murder case); Commonwealth v. Epsom, 399 Mass. 254, 257 (1987) (same); Commonwealth v. Klein, supra at 831 (deadly force during citizen arrest). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Kleingreen1 sentence2005If the defense is “affirmative,” once a defendant raises the defense to a charge and the defense is supported by sufficient evidence, the defendant is entitled to have a jury instruction on the defense, and the Commonwealth has the burden of disproving the defense. 18 Cf. Commonwealth v. Lopes, 440 Mass. 731, 740 (2004) (self-defense in murder case); Commonwealth v. Epsom, 399 Mass. 254, 257 (1987) (same); Commonwealth v. Klein, supra at 831 (deadly force during citizen arrest). | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Gary Halbertgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Kellygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Diazgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Vao Sokgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Waldengreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Peloquin
green
2 sentences2025To sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must show that "behavior of counsel [fell] measurably below that which might be expected from an ordinary fallible lawyer," and that such behavior "likely deprived the defendant of an otherwise available, substantial ground of [defense]." Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96 (1974). "[T]he preferred method for raising a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is through a motion 3 for a new trial." Commonwealth v. Zinser, 446 Mass. 807, 810 (2006). "[A]n ineffective assistance of counsel challenge made on the trial 2018The defendant raises his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, which is "the weakest form of such a challenge because it is bereft of any explanation by trial counsel for his actions and suggestive of strategy contrived by a defendant viewing the case with hindsight." Commonwealth v. Peloquin , 437 Mass. 204 , 210 n.5 (2002). | 4 | 2007–2025 |
Commonwealth v. Cabral
green
2 sentences2023Id. 2015Cabral, supra at 179-180 . 4 Given this trial record, I believe the judge’s original position was on the mark when he stated that he was “not convinced at this point that there’s sufficient evidence to raise this disciplinary defense.” That was a correct assessment of the evidence, and nothing changed once the evidence closed. | 2 | 2015–2023 |
Commonwealth v. Keita
green
1 sentence2026The Commonwealth then must "prove negatives beyond a reasonable doubt," first, "that the defendant did not have a mental disease or defect at the time of the crime" or, second, "if that is not disproved beyond a reasonable doubt, that no mental disease or defect caused the defendant to lack substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality 6 of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law." Id., quoting Commonwealth v. Keita, 429 Mass. 843 , 849- 850 (1999). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Commonwealth v. Lawson
green
2 sentences2026When a defendant raises a defense of lack of criminal responsibility and the trial evidence, if viewed "in the light most favorable to the defendant, would permit a reasonable finder of fact to have a reasonable doubt whether the defendant was criminally responsible at the time of the offense," then "the Commonwealth bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was criminally responsible." Lawson, 475 Mass. at 811 . 2026The Commonwealth then must "prove negatives beyond a reasonable doubt," first, "that the defendant did not have a mental disease or defect at the time of the crime" or, second, "if that is not disproved beyond a reasonable doubt, that no mental disease or defect caused the defendant to lack substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality 6 of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law." Id., quoting Commonwealth v. Keita, 429 Mass. 843 , 849- 850 (1999). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Babigian v. Committee on Professional Standards
green
1 sentence2023Finally, to the extent that the defendant raises a challenge to the judge's refusal to allow trial counsel to cross-examine the girlfriend about the victim's prior bad acts, based on her brief description of the victim as "a loving, kind guy," nothing about that aspect of the girlfriend's testimony "blew the door open on [the victim's] prior reputation," as defense counsel argued at trial. "[T]he prosecutor is entitled to tell the jury something of the person whose life ha[s] been 13 lost in order to humanize the proceedings." 12 Commonwealth v. Santiago, 425 Mass. 491, 495 (1997), S.C., 427 M | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Santiago v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2023Finally, to the extent that the defendant raises a challenge to the judge's refusal to allow trial counsel to cross-examine the girlfriend about the victim's prior bad acts, based on her brief description of the victim as "a loving, kind guy," nothing about that aspect of the girlfriend's testimony "blew the door open on [the victim's] prior reputation," as defense counsel argued at trial. "[T]he prosecutor is entitled to tell the jury something of the person whose life ha[s] been 13 lost in order to humanize the proceedings." 12 Commonwealth v. Santiago, 425 Mass. 491, 495 (1997), S.C., 427 M | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Santiago v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2023Finally, to the extent that the defendant raises a challenge to the judge's refusal to allow trial counsel to cross-examine the girlfriend about the victim's prior bad acts, based on her brief description of the victim as "a loving, kind guy," nothing about that aspect of the girlfriend's testimony "blew the door open on [the victim's] prior reputation," as defense counsel argued at trial. "[T]he prosecutor is entitled to tell the jury something of the person whose life ha[s] been 13 lost in order to humanize the proceedings." 12 Commonwealth v. Santiago, 425 Mass. 491, 495 (1997), S.C., 427 M | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Commonwealth v. Kosilek
green
1 sentence2018"The cumulative error was no more prejudicial than the individual errors, which had minimal impact." Commonwealth v. Kosilek , 423 Mass. 449 , 457 (1996). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Butler
green
2 sentences2018See United States v. MacDonald , 456 U.S. 1 , 7 n.7, 102 S.Ct. 1497 , 71 L.Ed.2d 696 (1982) ; Butler , 464 Mass. at 713 , 985 N.E.2d 377 . 2018See United States v. MacDonald , 456 U.S. 1 , 7 n.7, 102 S.Ct. 1497 , 71 L.Ed.2d 696 (1982) ; Butler , 464 Mass. at 713 , 985 N.E.2d 377 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Wright
green
2 sentences2017L. c. 278, § 33E, we do not consider the adequacy of trial counsel’s performance pursuant to Saferian, 366 Mass. at 96 , but, rather, consider whether there was ‘“an error in the course of the trial.” Wright, 411 Mass. at 682 . 2017L. c. 278, § 33E, we do not consider the adequacy of trial counsel's performance pursuant to Saferian, 366 Mass. at 96 , but, rather, consider whether there was "an error in the course of the trial." Wright, 411 Mass. at 682 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
1 sentence2016The defendant raises a claim that he made out a prima facie case of a violation on the basis of gender under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Florida v. Deconingh
green
1 sentence2004United States v. Halbert, 712 F.2d 388, 390 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005 (1984). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| Blaisdell v. Commonwealth green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.