27 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1926–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nardi v. Delaware River Port Authoritygreen2 sentences1990"It follows that neither creator state can unilaterally impose additional duties, powers or responsibilities upon the Authority." Nardi v. Delaware River Port Auth., 88 Pa. Commw. 558, 560 , 490 A. 2d 949, 950 (1985) (citing C.T. 1990“It follows that neither creator state can unilaterally impose additional duties, powers or responsibilities upon the Authority.” Nardi v. Delaware River Port Auth., 88 Pa.Commw. 558, 560, 490 A.2d 949, 950 (1985) (citing C.T. | 3 | 3 |
Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Authoritygreen2 sentences1990Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4 [ 382 A.2d 77 ] (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321 [ 395 A.2d 192 ] (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396 , 387 A.2d 41 (Pa.1978) (Pennsylvania’s immunity does not extend to this agency). 1990Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4 [ 382 A.2d 77 ] (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321 [ 395 A.2d 192 ] (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396 , 387 A.2d 41 (Pa.1978) (Pennsylvania’s immunity does not extend to this agency). | 3 | 3 |
Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Authoritygreen2 sentences1990Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4 [ 382 A.2d 77 ] (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321 [ 395 A.2d 192 ] (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396 , 387 A.2d 41 (Pa.1978) (Pennsylvania’s immunity does not extend to this agency). 1990Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4 [ 382 A.2d 77 ] (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321 [ 395 A.2d 192 ] (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396 , 387 A.2d 41 (Pa.1978) (Pennsylvania’s immunity does not extend to this agency). | 2 | 3 |
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewiczgreen1 sentence2024See also Burger King, 471 U.S. at 467-87 (in which a Michigan defendant applied for a franchise application from a plaintiff company headquartered in Florida, with an apparent intention to create a multi-year relationship with plaintiff); Power Invs., LLC v. SL EC, LLC, 927 F.3d 914, 919 (6th Cir. 2019) (in which a Missouri defendant solicited financing from a Kentucky plaintiff to purchase a power plant in Missouri); Waimberg v. Med. | 1 | 1 |
Waste Mgmt. of La., L. L.C. v. River Birch, Inc.green1 sentence2024See also Burger King, 471 U.S. at 467-87 (in which a Michigan defendant applied for a franchise application from a plaintiff company headquartered in Florida, with an apparent intention to create a multi-year relationship with plaintiff); Power Invs., LLC v. SL EC, LLC, 927 F.3d 914, 919 (6th Cir. 2019) (in which a Missouri defendant solicited financing from a Kentucky plaintiff to purchase a power plant in Missouri); Waimberg v. Med. | 1 | 1 |
Neger v. Negergreen2 sentences1997See Neger v. Neger, 93 N.J. 15, 35 , 459 A.2d 628 (1983). 1997See Neger v. Neger, 93 N.J. 15, 35 , 459 A.2d 628 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
Mortgagelinq Corp. v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurancegreen2 sentences1996Mortgagelinq, supra, 142 N.J. at 340-41, 662 A. 2d 536 . 1996Mortgagelinq, supra, 142 N.J. at 340-41, 662 A. 2d 536 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re Trust Under Will of Arensgreen2 sentences1994Id at 367-68, 197 A2d 1 . 1994Id at 367-68, 197 A2d 1 . | 1 | 1 |
Kohler v. McCrory Storesgreen2 sentences1991See also Kohler v. McCrory Stores, 395 Pa.Super. 188 , 576 A. 2d 1107 (Super.Ct. 1990), cert. granted, ___ Pa. ___, 588 A. 2d 510 (Pa. 1991) (Pennsylvania's exception requires that the injury was "caused by an act of a third person [intending] to injure the employee because of reasons personal to him"). 1991See also Kohler v. McCrory Stores, 395 Pa.Super. 188 , 576 A. 2d 1107 (Super.Ct. 1990), cert. granted, ___ Pa. ___, 588 A. 2d 510 (Pa. 1991) (Pennsylvania's exception requires that the injury was "caused by an act of a third person [intending] to injure the employee because of reasons personal to him"). | 1 | 1 |
Sorenson v. Raymark Industries, Inc.green2 sentences1989Super. at 564 -70 *141 (dismissing claim of workers allegedly suffering from asbestosis for unquantified enhanced risk of cancer based on plaintiffs' inability to satisfy New Jersey's standard of reasonable medical probability that disease will occur); Sorenson v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 51 Wash. App. 954 , 756 P. 2d 740, 742 (1988) (excluding evidence that asbestosis increases risk of cancer where plaintiff unable to prove reasonable probability that cancer will occur); cf. Giovanetti v. Johns-Manville Corp., 372 Pa.Super. 431 , 539 A. 2d 871, 874 (1988) (acknowledging that Pennsylvania law per 1989Super. at 564 -70 *141 (dismissing claim of workers allegedly suffering from asbestosis for unquantified enhanced risk of cancer based on plaintiffs' inability to satisfy New Jersey's standard of reasonable medical probability that disease will occur); Sorenson v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 51 Wash. App. 954 , 756 P. 2d 740, 742 (1988) (excluding evidence that asbestosis increases risk of cancer where plaintiff unable to prove reasonable probability that cancer will occur); cf. Giovanetti v. Johns-Manville Corp., 372 Pa.Super. 431 , 539 A. 2d 871, 874 (1988) (acknowledging that Pennsylvania law per | 1 | 1 |
Giovanetti v. Johns-Manville Corp.green2 sentences1989Super. at 564 -70 *141 (dismissing claim of workers allegedly suffering from asbestosis for unquantified enhanced risk of cancer based on plaintiffs' inability to satisfy New Jersey's standard of reasonable medical probability that disease will occur); Sorenson v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 51 Wash. App. 954 , 756 P. 2d 740, 742 (1988) (excluding evidence that asbestosis increases risk of cancer where plaintiff unable to prove reasonable probability that cancer will occur); cf. Giovanetti v. Johns-Manville Corp., 372 Pa.Super. 431 , 539 A. 2d 871, 874 (1988) (acknowledging that Pennsylvania law per 1989Super. at 564 -70 *141 (dismissing claim of workers allegedly suffering from asbestosis for unquantified enhanced risk of cancer based on plaintiffs' inability to satisfy New Jersey's standard of reasonable medical probability that disease will occur); Sorenson v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 51 Wash. App. 954 , 756 P. 2d 740, 742 (1988) (excluding evidence that asbestosis increases risk of cancer where plaintiff unable to prove reasonable probability that cancer will occur); cf. Giovanetti v. Johns-Manville Corp., 372 Pa.Super. 431 , 539 A. 2d 871, 874 (1988) (acknowledging that Pennsylvania law per | 1 | 1 |
Cathcart v. Keene Industrial Insulationgreen1 sentence1989Insulation, 342 Pa.Super. 123 , 471 A. 2d 493, 500-01 (1984) (acknowledging that under Pennsylvania law statute of limitations for all claims relating to asbestos exposure begins to run when plaintiff knew or should have known of initial injury). | 1 | 1 |
State v. United States Steel Corp.green1 sentence1971Pending cases are only affected by general words as to future proceedings from the point reached when the new law becomes operative. [ State v. United States Steel Corp., 12 N.J. 38, 43 (1953)] In State v. United States Steel Corp. the trial judge fixed a hearing for September 7, 1951 to consider an escheat under the 1946 Absolute Escheat Act. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Authority
green
2 sentences1990Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4 [ 382 A.2d 77 ] (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321 [ 395 A.2d 192 ] (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396 , 387 A.2d 41 (Pa.1978) (Pennsylvania’s immunity does not extend to this agency). 1990Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4 [ 382 A.2d 77 ] (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321 [ 395 A.2d 192 ] (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396 , 387 A.2d 41 (Pa.1978) (Pennsylvania’s immunity does not extend to this agency). | 3 | 1988–1990 |
Langdell v. Dodge
green
2 sentences1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N. H. 118, 122 A. 2d 529 (Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular- situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S. W. 2d 458 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). 1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N. H. 118, 122 A. 2d 529 (Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular- situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S. W. 2d 458 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). | 2 | 1964–1964 |
Community Thrift Club, Inc. v. Dearborn Acceptance Corp.
green
1 sentence1981Fn. at 784] The court in Community Thrift Club held ( 487 F. Supp. at 883 ) that notice and an opportunity to challenge the waiver of due process is not sufficient "if the debtor cannot challenge the *164 cognovit clause prior to the deprivation of his property through execution of the confessed judgment." The Pennsylvania procedure does not satisfy the Community Thrift Club requirement. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Pennsylvania v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences1980As New York residents, they would also share in the possible beneficial effect that a resulting *492 increase in tax revenue to New York might have on future New York tax rates. 5 As the trial court noted, the United States Supreme Court has rejected the State’s theory that New York and not the plaintiffs is the “real party in interest.” In Pennsylvania v. New Jersey, 426 U.S. 660 , 96 S.Ct. 2333 , 49 L.Ed.2d 124 (1976), Pennsylvania alleged that this State’s Transportation Benefits Tax, N.J.S.A. 54:8A-58 et seq., 6 was unconstitutional under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV 1980As New York residents, they would also share in the possible beneficial effect that a resulting *492 increase in tax revenue to New York might have on future New York tax rates. 5 As the trial court noted, the United States Supreme Court has rejected the State’s theory that New York and not the plaintiffs is the “real party in interest.” In Pennsylvania v. New Jersey, 426 U.S. 660 , 96 S.Ct. 2333 , 49 L.Ed.2d 124 (1976), Pennsylvania alleged that this State’s Transportation Benefits Tax, N.J.S.A. 54:8A-58 et seq., 6 was unconstitutional under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Avdel Corporation v. Mecure
green
1 sentence1976Under Sparks, [1] if not under Avdel, supra, these facts provided the minimal contacts required to support New Jersey jurisdiction over the person of the Pennsylvania defendant. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kervick
green
1 sentence1972PER CURIAM: In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Kervick, 114 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Koehler v. Koehler
green
2 sentences1966Koehler v. Koehler, 99 N.J. 1966Koehler v. Koehler, 99 N.J. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Cover v. Taliaferro
green
2 sentences1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N.H. 118 , 122 A. 2 d 529 ( Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S.W. 2 d 458 ( Ky. Ct. App. 1956). 1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N.H. 118 , 122 A. 2 d 529 ( Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S.W. 2 d 458 ( Ky. Ct. App. 1956). | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Hagedorn v. Arens
green
2 sentences1964The trial court saw fit to allow as fees and disbursements to counsel, R.R. 4:55-7(b), and to the expert witnesses, see Hagedorn v. Arens, supra 106 N.J. 1964The trial court saw fit to allow as fees and disbursements to counsel, R.R. 4:55-7(b), and to the expert witnesses, see Hagedorn v. Arens, supra 106 N.J. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
McCracken v. Gulick
neutral
2 sentences1964McCracken v. Gulick, supra ( 92 N.J. 1964McCracken v. Gulick, supra ( 92 N.J. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Company v. Hulette
green
2 sentences1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N. H. 118, 122 A. 2d 529 (Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular- situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S. W. 2d 458 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). 1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N. H. 118, 122 A. 2d 529 (Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular- situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S. W. 2d 458 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Fulton Ferry & Bridge Co. v. Blackwood
green
2 sentences1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N.H. 118 , 122 A. 2 d 529 ( Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S.W. 2 d 458 ( Ky. Ct. App. 1956). 1964Other states have found no difficulty in overruling, even with respect to existing trusts, case law which had established the Pennsylvania rule where either no statute on the subject had been adopted, Langdell v. Dodge, 100 N.H. 118 , 122 A. 2 d 529 ( Sup. Ct. 1956), or where the statute did not cover the particular situation, Farmers Bank & Capital Trust Co. v. Hulette, 293 S.W. 2 d 458 ( Ky. Ct. App. 1956). | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chatters
green
2 sentences1963Neither of them, as a common carrier, was under any duty, either by the common law or statute, to transport or assume any responsibility for the transportation of respondent beyond its own line." ( 279 U.S., at p. 330 , 49 S.Ct., at p. 332 ) Since the facts in Chatters are closely analogous to the facts in the instant case, this court deems the holding in Chatters to be controlling here, and therefore dispositive of Pennsylvania's motion for summary judgment. 1963Neither of them, as a common carrier, was under any duty, either by the common law or statute, to transport or assume any responsibility for the transportation of respondent beyond its own line." ( 279 U.S., at p. 330 , 49 S.Ct., at p. 332 ) Since the facts in Chatters are closely analogous to the facts in the instant case, this court deems the holding in Chatters to be controlling here, and therefore dispositive of Pennsylvania's motion for summary judgment. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Van Doren v. Olden
neutral
2 sentences1962As stated in Terhune, "paraphrased, it is necessary to determine whether any funds which could benefit the life tenants in the future have been irrevocably transferred to an account, the proceeds of which will redound solely to the benefit of the remainderman." The Pennsylvania rule was first looked upon with favor in this State in Van Doren v. Olden, 19 N.J. 1962As stated in Terhune, "paraphrased, it is necessary to determine whether any funds which could benefit the life tenants in the future have been irrevocably transferred to an account, the proceeds of which will redound solely to the benefit of the remainderman." The Pennsylvania rule was first looked upon with favor in this State in Van Doren v. Olden, 19 N.J. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
In Re the Estate of Fera
green
2 sentences1962In re Fera's Estate, 26 N.J. 131 (1958). 1962In re Fera's Estate, 26 N.J. 131 (1958). | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Zenner v. Goetz (Travelers Ind. Co.)
green
2 sentences1962Thus, in Zenner v. Goetz, 324 Pa. 432 , 188 A. 124 ( Sup. Ct. 1936), the insuror denied liability because its insured's car was carrying passengers for hire, a non-rated risk. 1962Thus, in Zenner v. Goetz, 324 Pa. 432 , 188 A. 124 ( Sup. Ct. 1936), the insuror denied liability because its insured's car was carrying passengers for hire, a non-rated risk. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
| Elizabeth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Howell green | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Stern v. Larocca
green
2 sentences1960Lamb places reliance upon our own decision in Stern v. Larocca, 49 N.J. 1960Lamb places reliance upon our own decision in Stern v. Larocca, 49 N.J. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
| Commonwealth v. Thompson green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| State v. Barth green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| State v. Cordasco green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| State v. Maioni green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| State v. James green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| In re the Accounting of Kelly neutral | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Estate of Traung green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Litterio v. United States green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Commonwealth v. Elliott green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| State v. Wise green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Commonwealth v. Bibalo green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Geisler v. United States green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Barmore v. Foster green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Pennsylvania ex rel. Darcy v. Handy green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Commonwealth v. Simmons green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Nirdlinger's Estate green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Commonwealth v. Wooding green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| State Ex Rel. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Upson neutral | 1 | 1954–1954 |
| Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. Melnick green | 1 | 1954–1954 |
| Lang v. Lang's green | 1 | 1952–1952 |
| Earp's Appeal green | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.