11 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1907–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. LKgreen2 sentences1999See State v. C.A., 304 N.W.2d 353 , 357 n. 3 (Minn.1981) (holding that conviction remanded on appeal but not retried was resolved in defendant’s favor, warranting expunction); State v. L.K., 359 N.W.2d 305, 307-08 (Minn.App.1984) (holding that dismissal after yearlong continuance was determination warranting expunction). 1999See State v. C.A., 304 N.W.2d 353 , 357 n. 3 (Minn.1981) (holding that conviction remanded on appeal but not retried was resolved in defendant’s favor, warranting expunction); State v. L.K., 359 N.W.2d 305, 307-08 (Minn.App.1984) (holding that dismissal after yearlong continuance was determination warranting expunction). | 1 | 1 |
State v. CAgreen2 sentences1999See State v. C.A., 304 N.W.2d 353 , 357 n. 3 (Minn.1981) (holding that conviction remanded on appeal but not retried was resolved in defendant’s favor, warranting expunction); State v. L.K., 359 N.W.2d 305, 307-08 (Minn.App.1984) (holding that dismissal after yearlong continuance was determination warranting expunction). 1999See State v. C.A., 304 N.W.2d 353 , 357 n. 3 (Minn.1981) (holding that conviction remanded on appeal but not retried was resolved in defendant’s favor, warranting expunction); State v. L.K., 359 N.W.2d 305, 307-08 (Minn.App.1984) (holding that dismissal after yearlong continuance was determination warranting expunction). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Goodwin v. McGaughey
neutral
2 sentences1970In Goodwin v. McGaughey, 108 Minn. 248 , 122 N. W. 6 , this court adopted the Pennsylvania rule, which was followed in In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 , and In re Trust Under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 580 . 1970In Goodwin v. McGaughey, 108 Minn. 248 , 122 N. W. 6 , this court adopted the Pennsylvania rule, which was followed in In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 , and In re Trust Under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 580 . | 5 | 1962–1970 |
In Re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre
neutral
2 sentences1970In Goodwin v. McGaughey, 108 Minn. 248 , 122 N. W. 6 , this court adopted the Pennsylvania rule, which was followed in In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 , and In re Trust Under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 580 . 1970In Goodwin v. McGaughey, 108 Minn. 248 , 122 N. W. 6 , this court adopted the Pennsylvania rule, which was followed in In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 , and In re Trust Under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 580 . | 5 | 1962–1970 |
In Re Trust Under Will of Koffend
green
2 sentences1970In Goodwin v. McGaughey, 108 Minn. 248 , 122 N. W. 6 , this court adopted the Pennsylvania rule, which was followed in In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 , and In re Trust Under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 580 . 1970In Goodwin v. McGaughey, 108 Minn. 248 , 122 N. W. 6 , this court adopted the Pennsylvania rule, which was followed in In re Trusts Under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 , and In re Trust Under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 580 . | 5 | 1962–1970 |
Catherwood Trust
green
2 sentences1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the 1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the | 4 | 1963–1970 |
Gardner v. Seymour
green
2 sentences1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the 1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the | 2 | 1970–1970 |
In Re Trust Under Last Will of Gardner
green
2 sentences1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the 1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the | 2 | 1970–1970 |
In Re Trust Under Will of Clarke
green
2 sentences1963As far as case law is concerned, we have adhered to that decision in Schmitt v. Eagle Roller Mill Co. 199 Minn. 382 , 272 N. W. 277 ; In re Trust under Will of Clarke, 204 Minn. 574 , 284 N. W. 876 ; In re Trusts under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 ; and In re Trust under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 590 . 1963As far as case law is concerned, we have adhered to that decision in Schmitt v. Eagle Roller Mill Co. 199 Minn. 382 , 272 N. W. 277 ; In re Trust under Will of Clarke, 204 Minn. 574 , 284 N. W. 876 ; In re Trusts under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 ; and In re Trust under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 590 . | 2 | 1963–1963 |
Schmitt v. Eagle Roller Mill Co.
green
2 sentences1963As far as case law is concerned, we have adhered to that decision in Schmitt v. Eagle Roller Mill Co. 199 Minn. 382 , 272 N. W. 277 ; In re Trust under Will of Clarke, 204 Minn. 574 , 284 N. W. 876 ; In re Trusts under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 ; and In re Trust under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 590 . 1963As far as case law is concerned, we have adhered to that decision in Schmitt v. Eagle Roller Mill Co. 199 Minn. 382 , 272 N. W. 277 ; In re Trust under Will of Clarke, 204 Minn. 574 , 284 N. W. 876 ; In re Trusts under Will of Whitacre, 208 Minn. 286 , 293 N. W. 784 ; and In re Trust under Will of Koffend, 218 Minn. 206 , 15 N. W. (2d) 590 . | 2 | 1963–1963 |
Johnson v. Fankell
green
2 sentences2015I believe that Monessen is consistent with the application of postverdict interest in FELA actions in Minnesota state courts, especially when considered within the context of the Supreme Court’s evolving preemption analysis as explained in Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 , 108 S. Ct. 2302 (1988) and Johnson v. Fankell, 520 U.S. 911 , 117 S. Ct. 1800 (1997). 2015I believe that Monessen is consistent with the application of postverdict interest in FELA actions in Minnesota state courts, especially when considered within the context of the Supreme Court’s evolving preemption analysis as explained in Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 , 108 S. Ct. 2302 (1988) and Johnson v. Fankell, 520 U.S. 911 , 117 S. Ct. 1800 (1997). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. Morgan
green
2 sentences2015Ry. v. Morgan, 486 U.S. 330 , 108 S. Ct. 1837 (1988), where the Court held that FELA preempted a Pennsylvania rule awarding preverdict delay damages. 2015Ry. v. Morgan, 486 U.S. 330 , 108 S. Ct. 1837 (1988), where the Court held that FELA preempted a Pennsylvania rule awarding preverdict delay damages. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Felder v. Casey
green
2 sentences2015I believe that Monessen is consistent with the application of postverdict interest in FELA actions in Minnesota state courts, especially when considered within the context of the Supreme Court’s evolving preemption analysis as explained in Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 , 108 S. Ct. 2302 (1988) and Johnson v. Fankell, 520 U.S. 911 , 117 S. Ct. 1800 (1997). 2015I believe that Monessen is consistent with the application of postverdict interest in FELA actions in Minnesota state courts, especially when considered within the context of the Supreme Court’s evolving preemption analysis as explained in Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 , 108 S. Ct. 2302 (1988) and Johnson v. Fankell, 520 U.S. 911 , 117 S. Ct. 1800 (1997). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Kuder v. Sawyer
green
2 sentences1970However, in 1958, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin held to the contrary in Will of Allis, 6 Wis.2d 1 , 94 N.W.2d 226 , 69 A.L.R.2d 1128 , and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A.2d 86 , overruled Crawford Estate, supra , and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N.W.2d 236 ): "* * * We think that as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra ] should be followed." Thus court said in In re Trus 1970However, in 1958, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin held to the contrary in Will of Allis, 6 Wis.2d 1 , 94 N.W.2d 226 , 69 A.L.R.2d 1128 , and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A.2d 86 , overruled Crawford Estate, supra , and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N.W.2d 236 ): "* * * We think that as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra ] should be followed." Thus court said in In re Trus | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Crawford Estate
green
2 sentences1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the 1970R. (2d) 1128, and thereafter the Pennsylvania court, in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61 , 173 A. (2d) 86, overruled Crawford Estate, supra, and followed the Wisconsin court in Will of Allis, supra. In the Warner case we discussed these cases and said ( 263 Minn. 468 , 117 N. W. [2d] 236): “* * * We think as far as the constitutional question is concerned these two decisions [Will of Allis, supra, and Catherwood Trust, supra] should be followed.” This court said in In re Trust Under Will of Gardner, 266 Minn. 127, 134 , 123 N. W. (2d) 69 , 74: “* * * It may well be said that the popularity of the | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.
green
2 sentences1946Co. 306 Pa. 98, 103 , 159 A. 10, 12 , as follows: “A speed of 40 miles an hour is not sufficient by itself or when associated with any fact or facts present in this case to support a finding of negligence. 1946Co. 306 Pa. 98, 103 , 159 A. 10, 12 , as follows: “A speed of 40 miles an hour is not sufficient by itself or when associated with any fact or facts present in this case to support a finding of negligence. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Janes v. Jenkins
green
2 sentences1913James v. Jenkins, 34 Md. 1 . 1913James v. Jenkins, 34 Md. 1 . | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Hite's Devisees v. Hite's
green
2 sentences1909Earp’s Appeal, 28 Pa. St. 368; Biddle’s Appeal, 99 Pa. St. 278; Hite’s Devisees v. Hite’s Exr., 93 Ky. 257 , 20 S. W. 778 , 19 L. 1909Earp’s Appeal, 28 Pa. St. 368; Biddle’s Appeal, 99 Pa. St. 278; Hite’s Devisees v. Hite’s Exr., 93 Ky. 257 , 20 S. W. 778 , 19 L. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.
green
1 sentence1907An especially clear statement of the Massachusetts and Pennsylvania rule is that of Mr. Justice Mitchell in East End v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co., 190 Pa. St. 350, 42 Atl. 707 . | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.