25 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.green2 sentences2000See First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp., 63 Ill.2d 128, 133 , 345 N.E.2d 493 (1976). 2000See First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp., 63 Ill.2d 128, 133 , 345 N.E.2d 493 (1976). | 2 | 3 |
Mohanty v. St. John Heart Clinic, S.C.green2 sentences2021See Mohanty, 225 Ill. 2d at 62 . 2021See Mohanty, 225 Ill. 2d at 62 . | 2 | 2 |
People v. Savorygreen2 sentences2015DNA testing is, of course, generally accepted in the scientific community, and so we turn to the material-relevance requirement. ¶ 31 “Evidence which is materially relevant to a claim of actual innocence is evidence which tends to significantly advance that claim, and, pursuant to the express terms of the statute, need not completely exonerate a defendant.” People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (1st) 113265, ¶ 24 (citing People v. Savory, 197 Ill. 2d 203, 213-14 (2001)). 2015DNA testing is, of course, generally accepted in the scientific community, and so we turn to the material-relevance requirement. ¶ 31 “Evidence which is materially relevant to a claim of actual innocence is evidence which tends to significantly advance that claim, and, pursuant to the express terms of the statute, need not completely exonerate a defendant.” People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (1st) 113265, ¶ 24 (citing People v. Savory, 197 Ill. 2d 203, 213-14 (2001)). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Smithgreen2 sentences2015DNA testing is, of course, generally accepted in the scientific community, and so we turn to the material-relevance requirement. ¶ 31 “Evidence which is materially relevant to a claim of actual innocence is evidence which tends to significantly advance that claim, and, pursuant to the express terms of the statute, need not completely exonerate a defendant.” People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (1st) 113265, ¶ 24 (citing People v. Savory, 197 Ill. 2d 203, 213-14 (2001)). 2015DNA testing is, of course, generally accepted in the scientific community, and so we turn to the material-relevance requirement. ¶ 31 “Evidence which is materially relevant to a claim of actual innocence is evidence which tends to significantly advance that claim, and, pursuant to the express terms of the statute, need not completely exonerate a defendant.” People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (1st) 113265, ¶ 24 (citing People v. Savory, 197 Ill. 2d 203, 213-14 (2001)). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Nitzgreen2 sentences2012See People v. Nitz, 371 Ill.App.3d 747, 750 , 309 Ill.Dec. 185 , 863 N.E.2d 817 (2007) (where the trial court granted the *960 State's motion for a directed finding on defendant's motion to quash an arrest and suppress evidence, the reviewing court stated that it must determine whether the defendant made a prima facie case so as to shift the burden of going forward to the State). 2012See People v. Nitz, 371 Ill.App.3d 747, 750 , 309 Ill.Dec. 185 , 863 N.E.2d 817 (2007) (where the trial court granted the *960 State's motion for a directed finding on defendant's motion to quash an arrest and suppress evidence, the reviewing court stated that it must determine whether the defendant made a prima facie case so as to shift the burden of going forward to the State). | 2 | 2 |
In Matter of Goose Creek Drainage District No. 1green2 sentences2004In re Goose Creek Drainage District No. 1, 307 Ill. 2004In re Goose Creek Drainage District No. 1 , 307 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Courier v. Industrial Commissiongreen1 sentence2024People v. Relwani, 2019 IL 123385, ¶ 18 ; Courier v. Industrial Commission, 282 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Andrewsgreen1 sentence2023Defendant does not challenge either of these findings. ¶ 21 Defendant cites the supreme court’s comment in People v. Andrews, 146 Ill. 2d 413, 427 (1992), that “[a] trial judge’s experience with local prosecutors and knowledge of local conditions are relevant factors in a prima facie case analysis.” He claims that, under Andrews, there was similar relevance in his counsel’s affidavit stating that, during his previous representation of an African American defendant, the State asked whether counsel would “ ‘play the race card.’ ” Defendant argues, in essence, that the term “race card” has racist | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gliniewicz
green
2 sentences2020Gliniewicz I, 2018 IL App (2d) 170490, ¶ 50 . 2020Gliniewicz I, 2018 IL App (2d) 170490, ¶ 50 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Doherty
green
2 sentences2010Bridgestone, 305 Ill. 2010Bridgestone, 305 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Hernandez v. New York
green
2 sentences2004As noted in Hernandez, the prima facie case analysis is rendered moot when a neutral reason is offered “without any prompting or inquiry from the trial court.” Hernandez, 500 U.S. at 359 , 114 L. 2004As noted in Hernandez, the prima facie case analysis is rendered moot when a neutral reason is offered “without any prompting or inquiry from the trial court.” Hernandez, 500 U.S. at 359 , 114 L. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Relwani
green
1 sentence2024People v. Relwani, 2019 IL 123385, ¶ 18 ; Courier v. Industrial Commission, 282 Ill. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Lalvani v. ILLINOIS HUMAN RIGHTS COM'N
green
1 sentence2024The court did not consider the employer’s subjective criteria as part of the prima facie case analysis. 7 Id. at 791 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Gliniewicz
green
2 sentences2020The State also repeated its argument that the admissibility of the communications should be considered under the marital privilege and not under section 115-16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (725 ILCS 5/115-16 (West 2016)), which generally bars spouses from testifying “as to any communication or admission made by either of them to the other or as to any conversation between them during marriage[.]” The -5- 2020 IL App (2d) 190412 State also argued that defendant’s consent to search her phone was not conditioned on the type of search to be performed. 2020Defendant knew that the police wanted to search her phone to see if there were text messages or other communications about “hiding money.” Our examination of the October 8, 2015, interview confirms our holding that the State made a prima facie case of waiver. - 19 - 2020 IL App (2d) 190412 ¶ 41 During the interview, the police told defendant that they wanted to clear some things up and find out what happened to Joe. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. HOMMERSON
green
2 sentences2018App. 3d at 413 -14 , 339 Ill.Dec. 560 , 927 N.E.2d 101 (defendant waived privilege by failing to invoke it during his wife's testimony). ¶ 50 We hold that the State has, by its representations to the trial court and by the exhibits, made a prima facie case of waiver. 2018App. 3d at 413 -14 , 339 Ill.Dec. 560 , 927 N.E.2d 101 (defendant waived privilege by failing to invoke it during his wife's testimony). ¶ 50 We hold that the State has, by its representations to the trial court and by the exhibits, made a prima facie case of waiver. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Simpson
green
2 sentences2018Defendant concedes that "a voluntary revelation by the holder of the privilege of the communication, or of a material part, is a waiver of that privilege," citing Simpson , 68 Ill. 2d at 281 -82 , 12 Ill.Dec. 234 , 369 N.E.2d 1248 . 2018Defendant concedes that "a voluntary revelation by the holder of the privilege of the communication, or of a material part, is a waiver of that privilege," citing Simpson , 68 Ill. 2d at 281 -82 , 12 Ill.Dec. 234 , 369 N.E.2d 1248 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Smith
green
2 sentences1992App. 3d 839, 846 , 557 N.E.2d 596 .) A prima facie case of waiver is established if the State produces evidence that the defendant was properly admonished and that, after being admonished, he waived his right to assistance of counsel. 1992Smith, 199 Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1992Specifically, the judge made no analysis of: whether a “pattern” of strikes against blacks was present (Batson, 476 U.S. at 97 , 90 L. 1992Specifically, the judge made no analysis of: whether a “pattern” of strikes against blacks was present (Batson, 476 U.S. at 97 , 90 L. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern Railroad
green
2 sentences1988Co. (1967), 37 Ill. 2d 494 [, 229 N.E.2d 504 ]), the court is not to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. *** * * * The prima facie case standard ordinarily applies to both jury and nonjury cases. 1988Co. (1967), 37 Ill. 2d 494 [, 229 N.E.2d 504 ]), the court is not to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. *** * * * The prima facie case standard ordinarily applies to both jury and nonjury cases. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Kokinis v. Kotrich
green
2 sentences1987In Kokinis v. Kotrich (1980), 81 Ill. 2d 151 , 407 N.E.2d 43 , our supreme court noted that the prima facie case standard ordinarily is applicable to both jury and nonjury cases. 1987In Kokinis v. Kotrich (1980), 81 Ill. 2d 151 , 407 N.E.2d 43 , our supreme court noted that the prima facie case standard ordinarily is applicable to both jury and nonjury cases. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Richard Gennuso v. Commercial Bank & Trust Company
green
1 sentence1982Plaintiff’s reliance upon Gennuso v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. (3d Cir. 1977), 566 F.2d 437 , is misplaced. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.