Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Whittington v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 2 | 2 |
Richardson v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 2 | 2 |
Padilla v. Stategreen2 sentences2013App. at 232-37 , 949 A.2d at 82-84 (describing the history of the exclusionary rule in Maryland and concluding that Meisinger remains good law); Raker, supra, at 411 (“[T]oday, in Maryland, other than the federal exclusionary rule, the [C]ourt [of Appeals] has not recognized an exclusionary rule for illegally seized evidence under Article 26.”). 2009Padilla, 180 Md.App. at 236 n. 12, 949 A.2d 68 . | 1 | 2 |
Chu v. Anne Arundel Countygreen2 sentences2005The Law In this, Part II, we shall first address the relevant law and then, in Part III, apply that law to the facts of the instant matter. *428 A. General Principles Because Greenstreet seeks to apply the federal exclusionary rule made applicable to the states by Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), cf. Chu v. Anne Arundel County, 311 Md. 673 , 537 A.2d 250 (1988) (no Maryland constitutional exclusionary rule), we look to the teachings of the Supreme Court on interpreting a search warrant affidavit. 2005The Law In this, Part II, we shall first address the relevant law and then, in Part III, apply that law to the facts of the instant matter. *428 A. General Principles Because Greenstreet seeks to apply the federal exclusionary rule made applicable to the states by Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), cf. Chu v. Anne Arundel County, 311 Md. 673 , 537 A.2d 250 (1988) (no Maryland constitutional exclusionary rule), we look to the teachings of the Supreme Court on interpreting a search warrant affidavit. | 1 | 2 |
Maryland State Police v. Zeiglergreen2 sentences2007See State v. Lancaster, 832 Md. 385 , 402 n. 12, 631 A.2d 453 , 462 n. 12 (1993) (“In a case before us which has been decided by the Court of Special Appeals the principle that a trial court will be affirmed for any reason adequately shown by the record is applicable only if the ground was presented in a petition for a writ of certiorari, in a cross-petition, or in this Court’s order granting certiorari”); Maryland State Police v. Zeigler, 330 Md. 540, 562-563 , 625 A.2d 914, 925 (1993). 2007See State v. Lancaster, 832 Md. 385 , 402 n. 12, 631 A.2d 453 , 462 n. 12 (1993) (“In a case before us which has been decided by the Court of Special Appeals the principle that a trial court will be affirmed for any reason adequately shown by the record is applicable only if the ground was presented in a petition for a writ of certiorari, in a cross-petition, or in this Court’s order granting certiorari”); Maryland State Police v. Zeigler, 330 Md. 540, 562-563 , 625 A.2d 914, 925 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lancastergreen2 sentences2007See State v. Lancaster, 832 Md. 385 , 402 n. 12, 631 A.2d 453 , 462 n. 12 (1993) (“In a case before us which has been decided by the Court of Special Appeals the principle that a trial court will be affirmed for any reason adequately shown by the record is applicable only if the ground was presented in a petition for a writ of certiorari, in a cross-petition, or in this Court’s order granting certiorari”); Maryland State Police v. Zeigler, 330 Md. 540, 562-563 , 625 A.2d 914, 925 (1993). 2007See State v. Lancaster, 332 Md. 385 , 402 n. 12, 631 A.2d 453 , 462 n. 12 (1993) ("In a case before us which has been decided by the Court of Special Appeals the principle that a trial court will be affirmed for any reason adequately shown by the record is applicable only if the ground was presented in a petition for a writ of certiorari, in a cross-petition, or in this Court's order granting certiorari"); Maryland State Police v. Zeigler, 330 Md. 540, 562-563 , 625 A.2d 914, 925 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Sheetz v. Mayor of Baltimoregreen2 sentences1999In Sheetz v. Mayor of Baltimore, 315 Md. 208, 212 , 553 A.2d 1281, 1283 (1989), we stated: As a general matter, the federal exclusionary rule applies to criminal proceedings. 1999In Sheetz v. Mayor of Baltimore, 315 Md. 208, 212 , 553 A.2d 1281, 1283 (1989), we stated: As a general matter, the federal exclusionary rule applies to criminal proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Calandragreen2 sentences1988We therefore decline to embrace a view that would achieve a speculative and undoubtedly minimal advance in the deterrence of police misconduct at the expense of substantially impeding the role of the grand jury. [Id. at 351-52, 94 S.Ct. at 621-22 , 38 L.Ed.2d at 573 (footnote omitted).] Under Calandra , the federal exclusionary rule would not apply to suppress the use of the Chus’ records in the Maryland prosecutor’s investigation of possible crime. 1988We therefore decline to embrace a view that would achieve a speculative and undoubtedly minimal advance in the deterrence of police misconduct at the expense of substantially impeding the role of the grand jury. [Id. at 351-52, 94 S.Ct. at 621-22 , 38 L.Ed.2d at 573 (footnote omitted).] Under Calandra , the federal exclusionary rule would not apply to suppress the use of the Chus’ records in the Maryland prosecutor’s investigation of possible crime. | 1 | 1 |
Irvine v. Californiagreen2 sentences1987In Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 139, 142, 149 , 74 S.Ct. 381, 386, 388, 392 , 98 L.Ed. 561 (1954), the Court expressed the hope that the states would adopt the federal exclusionary rule. 1987In Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 139, 142, 149 , 74 S.Ct. 381, 386, 388, 392 , 98 L.Ed. 561 (1954), the Court expressed the hope that the states would adopt the federal exclusionary rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Leon
green
2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 4 | 1988–2024 |
Mapp v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2005The Law In this, Part II, we shall first address the relevant law and then, in Part III, apply that law to the facts of the instant matter. *428 A. General Principles Because Greenstreet seeks to apply the federal exclusionary rule made applicable to the states by Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), cf. Chu v. Anne Arundel County, 311 Md. 673 , 537 A.2d 250 (1988) (no Maryland constitutional exclusionary rule), we look to the teachings of the Supreme Court on interpreting a search warrant affidavit. 2005The Law In this, Part II, we shall first address the relevant law and then, in Part III, apply that law to the facts of the instant matter. *428 A. General Principles Because Greenstreet seeks to apply the federal exclusionary rule made applicable to the states by Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), cf. Chu v. Anne Arundel County, 311 Md. 673 , 537 A.2d 250 (1988) (no Maryland constitutional exclusionary rule), we look to the teachings of the Supreme Court on interpreting a search warrant affidavit. | 4 | 1973–2005 |
Prescoe v. State
green
2 sentences1975Dailey v. State, 239 Md. 596 ; Prescoe v. State, 231 Md. 486 ; State v. Hill, 2 Md. 1968Dailey v. State, 239 Md. 596 ; Prescoe v. State, 231 Md. 486; Butina v. State, supra; State v. Hill, 2 Md. | 3 | 1968–1975 |
State v. Hill
green
2 sentences1975Dailey v. State, 239 Md. 596 ; Prescoe v. State, 231 Md. 486 ; State v. Hill, 2 Md. 1968Dailey v. State, 239 Md. 596 ; Prescoe v. State, 231 Md. 486; Butina v. State, supra; State v. Hill, 2 Md. | 3 | 1968–1975 |
Wong Sun v. United States
green
2 sentences1975Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U. S. 471 , stating^ the federal exclusionary rule that any evidence obtained as a result of an illegal^ arrest is tainted as the fruit of a poisonous tree, does not control prosecutions in State courts. 1968Assuming the federal exclusionary rule articulated in Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U. S. 471 , to be that any evidence obtained as a result of an illegal arrest is initially deemed tainted as the fruit of the poisonous tree, it has been held that that rule does not control prosecutions in State courts. | 3 | 1968–1975 |
Dailey v. State
neutral
2 sentences1975Dailey v. State, 239 Md. 596 ; Prescoe v. State, 231 Md. 486 ; State v. Hill, 2 Md. 1968Dailey v. State, 239 Md. 596 ; Prescoe v. State, 231 Md. 486; Butina v. State, supra; State v. Hill, 2 Md. | 3 | 1968–1975 |
Stevenson v. State
green
2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Agurs v. State
green
2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Greenstreet v. State
green
2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Minor v. State
green
2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Patterson v. State
green
2 sentences2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci 2024See e.g., Richardson v. State, 481 Md. 423 , 468–69 (2022); Whittington v. State, 474 Md. 1, 37 (2021); Stevenson v. State, 455 Md. 709 (2017); Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76 (2007); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652 (2006); Agurs v. State, 415 Md. 62 , 77–78 (2010); Minor v. State, 334 Md. 707 (1994). 26 In Leon, the Supreme Court “held that the federal exclusionary rule does not apply to evidence obtained under a search warrant that has later been found to be deficient, so long as the law enforcement officers acted in objectively reasonable reliance on the warrant.” Minor, 334 Md. at 712 (ci | 2 | 2024–2024 |
One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania
green
2 sentences1999In Sheetz v. Mayor of Baltimore, 315 Md. 208, 212 , 553 A.2d 1281, 1283 (1989), we stated: As a general matter, the federal exclusionary rule applies to criminal proceedings. *686 However the Supreme Court has extended the rule to at least one civil proceeding in One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 380 U.S. 693 , 85 S.Ct. 1246 , 14 L.Ed.2d 170 (1965). 1999In Sheetz v. Mayor of Baltimore, 315 Md. 208, 212 , 553 A.2d 1281, 1283 (1989), we stated: As a general matter, the federal exclusionary rule applies to criminal proceedings. *686 However the Supreme Court has extended the rule to at least one civil proceeding in One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 380 U.S. 693 , 85 S.Ct. 1246 , 14 L.Ed.2d 170 (1965). | 2 | 1989–1999 |
Weeks v. United States
red
2 sentences1976When Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 (1961), extended the federal exclusionary rule of Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383 , 58 L. 1976When Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 (1961), extended the federal exclusionary rule of Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383 , 58 L. | 2 | 1962–1976 |
Wolf v. Colorado
red
2 sentences1963Mapp , it will be recalled, overruled Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U. S. 25 , which had held the prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to be applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, but had refused to apply the federal exclusionary rule to a state prosecution. 1963Mapp , it will be recalled, overruled Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 , which had held the prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to be applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, but had refused to apply the federal exclusionary rule to a state prosecution. | 2 | 1962–1963 |
In Re Victoria S.
green
1 sentence2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences2002There is no Maryland counterpart to Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 , 40 S.Ct. 182 , 64 L.Ed. 319 (1920). 2002There is no Maryland counterpart to Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 , 40 S.Ct. 182 , 64 L.Ed. 319 (1920). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
United States v. Carignan
green
2 sentences1993Whether an interrogator’s language will be construed as promising a benefit or as threatening a detriment in such situations is a matter of very subjective choice.” United States v. Carignan, 342 U.S. 36, 41 , 72 S.Ct. 97, 97 , 96 L.Ed. 48 (1951) pointed out that whether the federal exclusionary principle was based on the Fifth Amendment privilege or on common law voluntariness, the standard was the same: “The constitutional test for admission of an accused’s confession in federal courts for a long time has been whether it was made ‘freely, voluntarily and without compulsion or inducement of a 1993Whether an interrogator’s language will be construed as promising a benefit or as threatening a detriment in such situations is a matter of very subjective choice.” United States v. Carignan, 342 U.S. 36, 41 , 72 S.Ct. 97, 97 , 96 L.Ed. 48 (1951) pointed out that whether the federal exclusionary principle was based on the Fifth Amendment privilege or on common law voluntariness, the standard was the same: “The constitutional test for admission of an accused’s confession in federal courts for a long time has been whether it was made ‘freely, voluntarily and without compulsion or inducement of a | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences1993Whether an interrogator’s language will be construed as promising a benefit or as threatening a detriment in such situations is a matter of very subjective choice.” United States v. Carignan, 342 U.S. 36, 41 , 72 S.Ct. 97, 97 , 96 L.Ed. 48 (1951) pointed out that whether the federal exclusionary principle was based on the Fifth Amendment privilege or on common law voluntariness, the standard was the same: “The constitutional test for admission of an accused’s confession in federal courts for a long time has been whether it was made ‘freely, voluntarily and without compulsion or inducement of a 1993Whether an interrogator’s language will be construed as promising a benefit or as threatening a detriment in such situations is a matter of very subjective choice.” United States v. Carignan, 342 U.S. 36, 41 , 72 S.Ct. 97, 97 , 96 L.Ed. 48 (1951) pointed out that whether the federal exclusionary principle was based on the Fifth Amendment privilege or on common law voluntariness, the standard was the same: “The constitutional test for admission of an accused’s confession in federal courts for a long time has been whether it was made ‘freely, voluntarily and without compulsion or inducement of a | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Everhart v. State
green
1 sentence1978At that time, the Court of Appeals, in Everhart v. State, 274 Md. 459 , 337 A. 2d 100 (1975), rev’g, 20 Md. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Everhart v. State
green
2 sentences1978At that time, the Court of Appeals, in Everhart v. State, 274 Md. 459 , 337 A. 2d 100 (1975), rev’g, 20 Md. 1978At that time, the Court of Appeals, in Everhart v. State, 274 Md. 459 , 337 A. 2d 100 (1975), rev’g, 20 Md. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Ker v. California green | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
green
1 sentence1971Ker v. California, 374 U. S. 23 , according to Mr. Justice Harlan concurring in Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 91 S. Ct. 2022, 2050 , forced the States to follow all the ins and outs of the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment decisions, handed down in federal cases. 8 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
| Henry v. United States green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| Boyd v. United States red | 1 | 1962–1962 |
| Meisinger v. State green | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.