Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
9 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Herring v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2024“To trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be . . . sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system.” Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 144 (2009). 2024“To trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be . . . sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system.” Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 144 (2009). | 2 | 2 |
Mapp v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2015Id. 2015Id. | 1 | 3 |
Collins v. Virginiagreen1 sentence2023See Collins, 138 S. Ct. at 1680 n.6 (“[T]he States are free to adopt their own exclusionary rules as a matter of state law. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Russogreen1 sentence2023Moreover, the exclusionary rule was wholly unknown as a remedy for unreasonable searches and seizures when our state constitution came into force in 1858, and was not adopted in Minnesota for over a century until the Supreme Court mandated its application to the states.” (citations omitted)); Commonwealth v. Russo, 934 A.2d 1199, 1207 (Pa. 2007) (“Indeed, notwithstanding that the federal exclusionary rule had been in existence since the 1914 decision in Weeks, this Court . . . repeatedly refused to find a similar 52 remedy encompassed in Article I, Section 8. . . . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Turner
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2019Id. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Boyd v. United States
red
2 sentences2022The federal exclusionary rule is generally thought to have originated in the Supreme Court’s decision in Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 . 2022The federal exclusionary rule is generally thought to have originated in the Supreme Court’s decision in Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Tonn
red
2 sentences2013Tonn justified its deviation from the federal exclusionary rule partly on the ground that “the overwhelming weight of authority in the state courts” already had decided not to follow that rule. 195 Iowa at 106 , 191 N.W. at 534. 2013Tonn justified its deviation from the federal exclusionary rule partly on the ground that "the overwhelming weight of authority in the state courts” already had decided not to follow that rule. 195 Iowa at 106 , 191 N.W. at 534. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.