23 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McFarlandgreen2 sentences2020See McFarland, 127 Wash.2d at 335 . 2019See id. (a personal restraint petition is the appropriate means for this court to review matters outside the appellate record). | 2 | 4 |
State v. Readgreen2 sentences2025“The trial court must view the evidence from the standpoint of a ‘reasonably prudent person who knows all the defendant knows and sees all the defendant sees.’” Id. (quoting State v. Read, 147 Wn.2d 238, 242 , 53 P.3d 26 - 18 - No. 86712-1-I (2002)). “[I]f no credible evidence appears on the record to support a claim of justifiable homicide, then the trial court must refuse to give a justifiable homicide instruction.” Id. 2025“The trial court must view the evidence from the standpoint of a ‘reasonably prudent person who knows all the defendant knows and sees all the defendant sees.’” Id. (quoting State v. Read, 147 Wn.2d 238, 242 , 53 P.3d 26 - 18 - No. 86712-1-I (2002)). “[I]f no credible evidence appears on the record to support a claim of justifiable homicide, then the trial court must refuse to give a justifiable homicide instruction.” Id. | 1 | 3 |
State v. Fernandez-Medinagreen1 sentence2014See State v. Fernandez-Medina, 141 Wn.2d 448 , 455 -5.6, 6 P. 3d 1150 ( 2000). ( " When determining if the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the giving of an instruction, the appellate court is to view the supporting evidence in the light most favorable to the party that requested the instruction. "). 1 Williams does not address this heightened requirement for self - defense claims in the context of a custodial assault prosecution. 7 No. 43887 -9 -II Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to Williams, there is no evidence in the record to support his claim of self - defense. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fernandez-Medinagreen1 sentence2014See State v. Fernandez-Medina, 141 Wn.2d 448 , 455 -5.6, 6 P. 3d 1150 ( 2000). ( " When determining if the evidence at trial was sufficient to support the giving of an instruction, the appellate court is to view the supporting evidence in the light most favorable to the party that requested the instruction. "). 1 Williams does not address this heightened requirement for self - defense claims in the context of a custodial assault prosecution. 7 No. 43887 -9 -II Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to Williams, there is no evidence in the record to support his claim of self - defense. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Weden v. San Juan Countygreen1 sentence2019PRSM contends that the superior court abused its discretion by refusing to supplement the record to support its claim that the SMP contains vague and contradictory provisions rendering it indecipherable to the average citizen. / “When a challenged ordinance does not involve First Amendment interests, the ordinance is not properly evaluated for facial vagueness.” Weden v. San Juan County, 135 Wn.2d 678, 708 , 958 P.2d 273 (1998) abrogated by Yim v. City of Seattle, No. 96817-9 (Wash. Nov. 14, 2019). | 1 | 1 |
Weden v. San Juan Countygreen1 sentence2019PRSM contends that the superior court abused its discretion by refusing to supplement the record to support its claim that the SMP contains vague and contradictory provisions rendering it indecipherable to the average citizen. / “When a challenged ordinance does not involve First Amendment interests, the ordinance is not properly evaluated for facial vagueness.” Weden v. San Juan County, 135 Wn.2d 678, 708 , 958 P.2d 273 (1998) abrogated by Yim v. City of Seattle, No. 96817-9 (Wash. Nov. 14, 2019). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Read
green
2 sentences2025“If no credible evidence appears on the record to support a claim of justifiable homicide, then the trial court must refuse to give a justifiable homicide instruction.” Id. 2025“If no credible evidence appears on the record to support a claim of justifiable homicide, then the trial court must refuse to give a justifiable homicide instruction.” Id. | 5 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Brightman
green
2 sentences2025“The trial court must view the evidence from the standpoint of a ‘reasonably prudent person who knows all the defendant knows and sees all the defendant sees.’” Id. (quoting State v. Read, 147 Wn.2d 238, 242 , 53 P.3d 26 - 18 - No. 86712-1-I (2002)). “[I]f no credible evidence appears on the record to support a claim of justifiable homicide, then the trial court must refuse to give a justifiable homicide instruction.” Id. 2025“The trial court must view the evidence from the standpoint of a ‘reasonably prudent person who knows all the defendant knows and sees all the defendant sees.’” Id. (quoting State v. Read, 147 Wn.2d 238, 242 , 53 P.3d 26 - 18 - No. 86712-1-I (2002)). “[I]f no credible evidence appears on the record to support a claim of justifiable homicide, then the trial court must refuse to give a justifiable homicide instruction.” Id. | 3 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Fisher
green
2 sentences2019State v. Fisher, 185 Wn.2d 836, 848-849 , 374 P.3d 1185 (2016). 2019State v. Fisher, 185 Wn.2d 836, 848-849 , 374 P.3d 1185 (2016). | 2 | 2017–2019 |
State v. McCullum
green
2 sentences2005McCullum, 98 Wn.2d at 488 . ¶27 Actual Defense of an Attempted Felony. 2005McCullum, 98 Wash.2d at 488 , 656 P.2d 1064 . ¶ 27 Actual Defense of an Attempted Felony: Brightman's arguments in this court focus on RCW 9A.16.050(2) (justifiable homicide based on actual defense against felony) and RCW 9A.16.020 (defining the lawful use of force). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State Of Washington v. Samuel Lee Irwin
green
1 sentence2025Id. (citing RAP 16.4). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Gourley v. Gourley
green
1 sentence2020App. 2d at 142. 46 Aiken, 187 Wn. 2d at 503 ; Gourley, 158 Wn.2d at 468 . 47 RCW 26.09.191(3). 13 No. 79532-5-I/14 citations to the record to support his claim. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Aiken v. Aiken
green
1 sentence2020App. 2d at 142. 46 Aiken, 187 Wn. 2d at 503 ; Gourley, 158 Wn.2d at 468 . 47 RCW 26.09.191(3). 13 No. 79532-5-I/14 citations to the record to support his claim. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Champagne v. Thurston County
green
1 sentence2019However, she does not provide any citation to the record for this statement and there is no evidence in the record to support this claim. 26 No. 50391-3-II Under CR 8(a), a complaint must contain “(1) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and (2) a demand for judgment for the relief to which the pleader deems the pleader is entitled.” This rule allows “notice pleading.” See Champagne v. Thurston County, 163 Wn.2d 69, 84-85 , 178 P.3d 936 (2008). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Maynard v. Cartwright
green
2 sentences2019In Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. 356, 361 , 108 S. Ct. 1853 , 100 L. 2019In Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. 356, 361 , 108 S. Ct. 1853 , 100 L. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Champagne v. Thurston County
green
1 sentence2019However, she does not provide any citation to the record for this statement and there is no evidence in the record to support this claim. 26 No. 50391-3-II Under CR 8(a), a complaint must contain “(1) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and (2) a demand for judgment for the relief to which the pleader deems the pleader is entitled.” This rule allows “notice pleading.” See Champagne v. Thurston County, 163 Wn.2d 69, 84-85 , 178 P.3d 936 (2008). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Whyde
green
1 sentence2017Whyde, 30 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
New Hope of Washington v. Ramquist
green
1 sentence2015Again, "a parent's unwillingness or inability to make use of the services provided excuses the State from offering extra services that might have been helpful." Ramquist, 52 Wn. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Bavand v. OneWest Bank, FSB
green
1 sentence2015App. 475, 486 , 309 P.3d 636 (2013). -6- NO. 71618-2-1/7 Lyon cites no evidence in the record to support her claim that Citibank holds her deed of trust as security for a different obligation. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley
green
1 sentence2014RAP 10. 3( a)( 5), ( 6); Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, 118 Wn.2d at 809 . ( Again, the record shows the contrary: The trial court directly addressed Nelson' s contention at the August 3, 2012 modification hearing. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Bradley
neutral
1 sentence2013App. 313, 336 , 135 P.3d 966 (2006), rev, denied, 159 Wn.2d 1010 (2007). 9 No. 67572-9-1/10 about the possible negative effects of stun belts, he offers no evidence in the record to support his claim. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Monschke
neutral
1 sentence2013App. 313, 336 , 135 P.3d 966 (2006), rev, denied, 159 Wn.2d 1010 (2007). 9 No. 67572-9-1/10 about the possible negative effects of stun belts, he offers no evidence in the record to support his claim. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.