Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coulter v. Stategreen2 sentences1999Coulter v. State, 721 P.2d 818, 819 (Okl.Cr.1986). 1999Coulter v. State, 721 P.2d 818, 819 (Okl.Cr.1986). | 3 | 3 |
White v. Stategreen2 sentences1987See White v. State, 458 P.2d 322, 327 (Okl.Cr. 1969). 1987See White v. State, 458 P.2d 322, 327 (Okl.Cr.1969). | 2 | 2 |
Nauni v. Stategreen2 sentences1986Nauni v. State, 670 P.2d 126 (Okl.Cr.1983). 1985See, Nauni v. State, 670 P.2d 126 (Okl.Cr.1983). | 1 | 2 |
Cherbonnier v. Stategreen2 sentences1991See Cherbonnier v. State, 751 P.2d 1098, 1099 (Okl.Cr.1988). 1991See Cherbonnier v. State, 751 P.2d 1098, 1099 (Okl.Cr. 1988). | 1 | 1 |
Broaddrick v. Stategreen1 sentence1987As I stated in Broaddrick v. State, 706 P.2d 534, 537-38 (Okl.Cr.1985) (Parks, P.J., Specially Concurring): This [is] clearly contrary to 22 O.S.1981, § 834, which states, in pertinent part, that ‘questions of law are to be decided by the court, and questions of fact are to be decided by the jury....’ Our current approach — the practice of this State since time immemorial — has been to require the trial court to give a theory of defense instruction, if requested, when there is any evidence in the record to support the defense, and even if the evidence is discredited. | 1 | 1 |
Dilworth v. Stategreen1 sentence1983Dil- *134 worth v. State, 611 P.2d 256, 259 (Okl.Cr.1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Price v. Price
green
2 sentences2011"This Court will not accept unsupported statements in the brief, or statements made in argument of counsel to the *910 trial court, otherwise unsupported, as a basis for appellate decision." Price v. Price, 1970 OK 116, 18 , 471 P2d 894, 896 . 2011"This Court will not accept unsupported statements in the brief, or statements made in argument of counsel to the *910 trial court, otherwise unsupported, as a basis for appellate decision." Price v. Price, 1970 OK 116, 18 , 471 P2d 894, 896 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Grayson v. State
green
1 sentence1988Grayson v. State, 687 P.2d 747 (Okl.Cr.1984). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.