9 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Randy Ray Pickering v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2023Pickering v. State, 2020 WY 66, ¶¶ 54-56 , 464 P.3d 236, 255 (Wyo. 2020) (other citations omitted). [¶22] In Shipman v. State, 2001 WY 11, ¶ 7 , 17 P.3d 34, 36 (Wyo. 2001), the appellant claimed his trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to investigate certain witnesses and evidence, failing to request discovery from the State regarding the qualifications of its mental health examiner, and failing to have physical evidence tested by an independent examiner. 2023Pickering v. State, 2020 WY 66, ¶¶ 54-56 , 464 P.3d 236, 255 (Wyo. 2020) (other citations omitted). [¶22] In Shipman v. State, 2001 WY 11, ¶ 7 , 17 P.3d 34, 36 (Wyo. 2001), the appellant claimed his trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to investigate certain witnesses and evidence, failing to request discovery from the State regarding the qualifications of its mental health examiner, and failing to have physical evidence tested by an independent examiner. | 1 | 1 |
Shipman v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Pickering v. State, 2020 WY 66, ¶¶ 54-56 , 464 P.3d 236, 255 (Wyo. 2020) (other citations omitted). [¶22] In Shipman v. State, 2001 WY 11, ¶ 7 , 17 P.3d 34, 36 (Wyo. 2001), the appellant claimed his trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to investigate certain witnesses and evidence, failing to request discovery from the State regarding the qualifications of its mental health examiner, and failing to have physical evidence tested by an independent examiner. 2023Pickering v. State, 2020 WY 66, ¶¶ 54-56 , 464 P.3d 236, 255 (Wyo. 2020) (other citations omitted). [¶22] In Shipman v. State, 2001 WY 11, ¶ 7 , 17 P.3d 34, 36 (Wyo. 2001), the appellant claimed his trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to investigate certain witnesses and evidence, failing to request discovery from the State regarding the qualifications of its mental health examiner, and failing to have physical evidence tested by an independent examiner. | 1 | 1 |
Osban v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Osban, ¶ 7 n.2, 439 P.3d at 741 n.2 (“An appellant is required to present this court with relevant authority and cogent argument. | 1 | 1 |
Worker's Compensation Claim of Dale v. S & S Builders, LLCgreen1 sentence2013See Dale, 122, 188 P.3d at 561 . [131] Affirmed. 1 . | 1 | 1 |
Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Divisiongreen2 sentences2013Div., 2002 WY 91, ¶ 7 , 49 P.3d 163, 166 (Wyo.2002)). [T18] For that reason, this Court will not review whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the hearing examiner's decision that the appellant was not terminated for misconduct. 2013Div., 2002 WY 91, ¶ 7 , 49 P.3d 163, 166 (Wyo.2002)). [T18] For that reason, this Court will not review whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the hearing examiner's decision that the appellant was not terminated for misconduct. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Kaczmarekgreen2 sentences2010Claim of Kaczmarek, 2009 WY 110, ¶¶ 7-8 , 215 P.3d 277, 280-81 (Wyo.2009). *959 DISCUSSION [18] As noted above, on appeal to the Commission, the Commission limited the scope of its review to determining whether there was substantial evidence in the record to support the hearing officer's general conclusion that Sierra was subject to the WESL, because it paid wages for services performed in Wyoming from 2004 through 2006. 2010Claim of Kaczmarek, 2009 WY 110, ¶¶ 7-8 , 215 P.3d 277, 280-81 (Wyo.2009). *959 DISCUSSION [18] As noted above, on appeal to the Commission, the Commission limited the scope of its review to determining whether there was substantial evidence in the record to support the hearing officer's general conclusion that Sierra was subject to the WESL, because it paid wages for services performed in Wyoming from 2004 through 2006. | 1 | 1 |
Leithead v. American Colloid Co.green1 sentence2000Relying upon the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress as de-seribed in the Restatement of Torts (Second) § 46, as it has been adopted by this Court in Leithead v. American Colloid Co., 721 P.2d 1059, 1065 (Wyo.1986), the district court invoked its role as a gatekeeper in ruling upon the insufficiency of the record to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress as a matter of law. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Big Horn Coal Company v. Wartensleben
green
2 sentences1998In Big Horn Coal Co. v. Wartensleben, 502 P.2d at 188 , this court distinguished between a trivial injury and a compensable injury: [Wjhere an employee in the course of his employment sustains an apparent trivial injury which does not result in present disability and which would not reasonably be expected to cause future disability, but which injury in fact over a period of latency does cause future disability, the time for giving notice of the occurrence of the injury to the employer runs from the time when it becomes apparent that such injury has resulted in, or is likely to cause, com-pensa 1998In Big Horn Coal Co. v. Wartensleben, 502 P.2d at 188 , this court distinguished between a trivial injury and a compensable injury: [W]here an employee in the course of his employment sustains an apparent trivial injury which does not result in present disability and which would not reasonably be expected to cause future disability, but which injury in fact over a period of latency does cause future disability, the time for giving notice of the occurrence of the injury to the employer runs from the time when it becomes apparent that such injury has resulted in, or is likely to cause, compensab | 2 | 1998–1998 |
People v. Cage
green
1 sentence2007Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the hearing examiner's decision that the brain injury was not the direct and natural result of the initial compensable injury and Mr. Stewart has failed to establish arbitrary or capricious administrative action. [118] Affirmed. *205 PEOPLE v. CAGE Cal. 205 Cite as 155 P.3d 205 (Cal. 2007) 1 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.