record to support hearing in Maryland

10 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2023 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shoupgreen md · 2009 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 2 sentences 2023This is especially true if “[t]here is ample evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s conclusion.” Id., 979 A.2d at 136 . 2023This is especially true if “[t]here is ample evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s conclusion.” Id., 979 A.2d at 136 .	2	2
Attorney Grievance v. Daileygreen md · 2021 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 2 sentences 2022On this basis alone, “there is competent evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s findings of fact[.]” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Dailey, 474 Md. 679, 700 , 255 A.3d 1068, 1080 (2021); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 450 Md. 621, 640 , 150 A.3d 338 , 349 (2016); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Steinberg, 395 Md. 337 , 351–52, 910 A.2d 429 , 437–38 (2006). 2022On this basis alone, “there is competent evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s findings of fact[.]” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Dailey, 474 Md. 679, 700 , 255 A.3d 1068, 1080 (2021); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 450 Md. 621, 640 , 150 A.3d 338 , 349 (2016); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Steinberg, 395 Md. 337 , 351–52, 910 A.2d 429 , 437–38 (2006).	2	2
Fletcher v. Dixongreen md · 1908 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1928–1928 1 sentence 1928If there had been a special exception to the granting of the prayer for the reasons now assigned for the rejection of the prayer, as was the case in Fletcher v. Dixon, 107 Md. 420, 430, 431 , that case would be authority in support of appellants’ argument that there must be evidence in the record to support this claim by way of general damages; but, as has been repeatedly determined, this court is not permitted to consider the objection, because there was no special exception in the trial court to the prayer on the ground now taken.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

Case	Cited	Years
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sperling green md · 2018 2 sentences 2023Mitigating Factors “In attorney grievance proceedings, this Court considers several mitigating factors based upon ABA Standard 9.32.” Bonner, 477 Md. at 609 & n.17 (quoting Sperling, 459 Md. at 277–78 (listing the recognized mitigating factors)). 2023Mitigating Factors “In attorney grievance proceedings, this Court considers several mitigating factors based upon ABA Standard 9.32.” Bonner, 477 Md. at 609 & n.17 (quoting Sperling, 459 Md. at 277–78 (listing the recognized mitigating factors)).	2	2023–2023
Attorney Grievance v. Bonner green md · 2022 2 sentences 2023Mitigating Factors “In attorney grievance proceedings, this Court considers several mitigating factors based upon ABA Standard 9.32.” Bonner, 477 Md. at 609 & n.17 (quoting Sperling, 459 Md. at 277–78 (listing the recognized mitigating factors)). 2023Mitigating Factors “In attorney grievance proceedings, this Court considers several mitigating factors based upon ABA Standard 9.32.” Bonner, 477 Md. at 609 & n.17 (quoting Sperling, 459 Md. at 277–78 (listing the recognized mitigating factors)).	2	2023–2023
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Steinberg green md · 2006 2 sentences 2022On this basis alone, “there is competent evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s findings of fact[.]” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Dailey, 474 Md. 679, 700 , 255 A.3d 1068, 1080 (2021); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 450 Md. 621, 640 , 150 A.3d 338 , 349 (2016); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Steinberg, 395 Md. 337 , 351–52, 910 A.2d 429 , 437–38 (2006). 2022On this basis alone, “there is competent evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s findings of fact[.]” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Dailey, 474 Md. 679, 700 , 255 A.3d 1068, 1080 (2021); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 450 Md. 621, 640 , 150 A.3d 338 , 349 (2016); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Steinberg, 395 Md. 337 , 351–52, 910 A.2d 429 , 437–38 (2006).	2	2022–2022
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Johnson green md · 2016 2 sentences 2022On this basis alone, “there is competent evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s findings of fact[.]” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Dailey, 474 Md. 679, 700 , 255 A.3d 1068, 1080 (2021); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 450 Md. 621, 640 , 150 A.3d 338 , 349 (2016); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Steinberg, 395 Md. 337 , 351–52, 910 A.2d 429 , 437–38 (2006). 2022On this basis alone, “there is competent evidence in the record to support the hearing judge’s findings of fact[.]” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Dailey, 474 Md. 679, 700 , 255 A.3d 1068, 1080 (2021); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 450 Md. 621, 640 , 150 A.3d 338 , 349 (2016); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Steinberg, 395 Md. 337 , 351–52, 910 A.2d 429 , 437–38 (2006).	2	2022–2022
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tanko green md · 2012 2 sentences 2017Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Tanko, 427 Md. 15, 27 , 45 A.3d 281 (2012). hH 1—i Respondent s Exceptions Bar Counsel did not file any exceptions to the hearing judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. 2017Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Tanko, 427 Md. 15, 27 , 45 A.3d 281 (2012). hH 1—i Respondent s Exceptions Bar Counsel did not file any exceptions to the hearing judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.	2	2017–2017
In Re Appeal No. 179 green mdctspecapp · 1974 2 sentences 2001Id. at 500-01 , 327 A.2d 793 . 2001Id. at 500-01 , 327 A.2d 793 .	1	2001–2001
Havens v. A. J. Reach Co. neutral md · 1921 1 sentence 1928Code, art. 5, sec. 10; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 460 ; Heath v. Michael, 145 Md. 277, 284 ; Kelley v. Stanton, 141 Md. 380, 385 ; Fait v. Bannon 127 Md. 698 ; Adkins v. Hastings, 138 Md. 454, 463 ; Streett v. Hodgson, 139 Md. 137, 147 ; Havens v. Reach Co., 139 Md. 481, 484 .	1	1928–1928
Kelley v. Stanton green md · 1922 1 sentence 1928Code, art. 5, sec. 10; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 460 ; Heath v. Michael, 145 Md. 277, 284 ; Kelley v. Stanton, 141 Md. 380, 385 ; Fait v. Bannon 127 Md. 698 ; Adkins v. Hastings, 138 Md. 454, 463 ; Streett v. Hodgson, 139 Md. 137, 147 ; Havens v. Reach Co., 139 Md. 481, 484 .	1	1928–1928
Heath v. Michael green md · 1924 1 sentence 1928Code, art. 5, sec. 10; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 460 ; Heath v. Michael, 145 Md. 277, 284 ; Kelley v. Stanton, 141 Md. 380, 385 ; Fait v. Bannon 127 Md. 698 ; Adkins v. Hastings, 138 Md. 454, 463 ; Streett v. Hodgson, 139 Md. 137, 147 ; Havens v. Reach Co., 139 Md. 481, 484 .	1	1928–1928
Streett v. Hodgson green · 1921 1 sentence 1928Code, art. 5, sec. 10; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 460 ; Heath v. Michael, 145 Md. 277, 284 ; Kelley v. Stanton, 141 Md. 380, 385 ; Fait v. Bannon 127 Md. 698 ; Adkins v. Hastings, 138 Md. 454, 463 ; Streett v. Hodgson, 139 Md. 137, 147 ; Havens v. Reach Co., 139 Md. 481, 484 .	1	1928–1928
Burns v. Bannon neutral md · 1916 1 sentence 1928Code, art. 5, sec. 10; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 460 ; Heath v. Michael, 145 Md. 277, 284 ; Kelley v. Stanton, 141 Md. 380, 385 ; Fait v. Bannon 127 Md. 698 ; Adkins v. Hastings, 138 Md. 454, 463 ; Streett v. Hodgson, 139 Md. 137, 147 ; Havens v. Reach Co., 139 Md. 481, 484 .	1	1928–1928
Nichols v. Meyer green md · 1921 1 sentence 1928Code, art. 5, sec. 10; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 460 ; Heath v. Michael, 145 Md. 277, 284 ; Kelley v. Stanton, 141 Md. 380, 385 ; Fait v. Bannon 127 Md. 698 ; Adkins v. Hastings, 138 Md. 454, 463 ; Streett v. Hodgson, 139 Md. 137, 147 ; Havens v. Reach Co., 139 Md. 481, 484 .	1	1928–1928
Adkins v. Hastings green md · 1921 1 sentence 1928Code, art. 5, sec. 10; Nichols v. Meyer, 139 Md. 450, 460 ; Heath v. Michael, 145 Md. 277, 284 ; Kelley v. Stanton, 141 Md. 380, 385 ; Fait v. Bannon 127 Md. 698 ; Adkins v. Hastings, 138 Md. 454, 463 ; Streett v. Hodgson, 139 Md. 137, 147 ; Havens v. Reach Co., 139 Md. 481, 484 .	1	1928–1928

Where else courts name it

IL 55 (1970–2026) PA 54 (1987–2026) NY 45 (1957–2023) CA 45 (1937–2026) KS 38 (1994–2024) TX 38 (1967–2026) OH 33 (1992–2026) WA 23 (2005–2025) IN 23 (1975–2020) CT 20 (1964–2020) ND 20 (1974–2016) MI 20 (1956–2025) MS 19 (1996–2022) AZ 17 (1958–2026) FL 17 (1961–2025) MO 16 (1908–2023) NM 15 (2009–2026) CO 13 (1974–2010) GA 12 (1980–2024) IA 10 (1972–2022) OK 10 (1983–2011) MD 10 (1928–2023) WY 9 (1998–2023) OR 8 (1995–2026) TN 8 (1987–2015) UT 8 (1988–2025) SD 7 (1966–2025) ID 7 (1964–2023) DC 6 (1992–2004) MA 5 (1911–2010) VA 5 (1920–2025) NJ 4 (1990–2025) ME 4 (1990–2017) LA 3 (2005–2013) AR 3 (1927–2008) AK 3 (1980–2014) AL 3 (1973–2001) KY 3 (2001–2025) WV 3 (1987–2023) DE 2 (2020–2020) WI 2 (1990–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check