qualification rule (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

qualification rule in Alabama

22 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1908–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Harrison v. Stategreen
alacrimapp · 1980 · cited in 2 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
2 sentences

1982United States v. Simmons , 96 U.S. 360 , 24 L.Ed. 819 (1877)." This court's case of Harrison v. State , 384 So.2d 641 , 643 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980), also addressed the requirements of a valid indictment: "`If there is no indictment form for an offense set out in Code § 15-8-150 , then an indictment which closely parallels the language of the statute creating the offense is generally valid.

1982United States v. Simmons, 96 U.S. 360 , 24 L.Ed. 819 (1877).” This court’s case of Harrison v. State, 384 So.2d 641, 643 (Ala.Cr.App.1980), also addressed the requirements of a valid indictment: “If there is no indictment form for an offense set out in Code § 15-8-150, then an indictment which closely parallels the language of the statute creating the offense is generally valid.

12
Smith v. Stategreen
alacrimapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011See also Owens v. State, 825 So.2d 861 (Ala.Crim.App.2001). “[U]n-der our system of pleading, indictments are rather a statement of legal conclusions, than of facts.... [I]t is not required that an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction.” Smith v. State, 797 So.2d 503, 514 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) (internal citations and quotations omitted).

11
Owens v. Stategreen
alacrimapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011See also Owens v. State, 825 So.2d 861 (Ala.Crim.App.2001). “[U]n-der our system of pleading, indictments are rather a statement of legal conclusions, than of facts.... [I]t is not required that an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction.” Smith v. State, 797 So.2d 503, 514 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) (internal citations and quotations omitted).

11
Bleier v. Wellington Sears Companygreen
ala · 2000 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007For example, the employer will not be allowed to contend that its reason for discharging the employee was that he was recuperating in the hospital from his on-the-job injury and thus was unable or unwilling to do the job." 757 So.2d at 1173 (Johnstone, J., concurring specially).

11
Tucker v. McLendongreen
ala · 1924 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1963–1963
2 sentences

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (32)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Simmons green
scotus · 1878
2 sentences

1986United States v. Simmons , 96 U.S. 360 , [ 6 Otto 360 ] 24 L.Ed. 819 (1877)." Wilder v. State , 401 So.2d 151 , 160 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 167 (Ala. 1981).

1986United States v. Simmons , 96 U.S. 360 , [ 6 Otto 360 ] 24 L.Ed. 819 (1877)." Wilder v. State , 401 So.2d 151 , 160 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 167 (Ala. 1981).

51981–1986
Crane v. State green
ala · 1981
2 sentences

1986United States v. Simmons , 96 U.S. 360 , [ 6 Otto 360 ] 24 L.Ed. 819 (1877)." Wilder v. State , 401 So.2d 151 , 160 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 167 (Ala. 1981).

1982United States v. Simmons , 96 U.S. 360 , 24 L.Ed. 819 (1877); Wilder , supra. A comparison of the language used in the indictment and in § 13A-7-42 (a), defining arson in the second degree, shows that the language in the indictment closely parallels the statutory language.

21982–1986
Hill v. Almon neutral
ala · 1932
2 sentences

1972Hill v. Almon, 224 Ala. 658 , 141 So. 625 (8).

1972Hill v. Almon, 224 Ala. 658 , 141 So. 625 (8).

21968–1972
Ferris v. Montgomery Land & Improvement Co. neutral
· 1891
2 sentences

1919In Ferris v. Montgomery, etc., 94 Ala. 557 , 10 South. 607 , 33 Am.

1908In Ferris v. Montgomery, etc., 94 Ala. 557 , 10 South 607 , 33 Am.

21908–1919
Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. v. TUSCALOOSA CTY. green
ala · 2008
1 sentence

2025A repeal will also result by implication when a comprehensive revision of a particular subject is promulgated, or upon the predication of a statewide system of administration to replace previous regulation by localities." ' " 994 So. 2d at 261 (quoting Day, 487 So. 2d at 858-59 , quoting in turn Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 23.15 at 245 (Sands 4th ed. 1985)) (emphasis omitted).

12025–2025
Day v. MORGAN COUNTY COM'N green
ala · 1986
1 sentence

2025A repeal will also result by implication when a comprehensive revision of a particular subject is promulgated, or upon the predication of a statewide system of administration to replace previous regulation by localities." ' " 994 So. 2d at 261 (quoting Day, 487 So. 2d at 858-59 , quoting in turn Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 23.15 at 245 (Sands 4th ed. 1985)) (emphasis omitted).

12025–2025
Connor v. State on Information of Boutwell green
ala · 1963
2 sentences

2008A repeal will also result by implication when a comprehensive revision of a particular subject is promulgated, or upon the predication of a statewide system of administration to replace previous regulation by localities' (Footnotes omitted.) "To the same effect is this Court's observation on repeals by implication contained in Connor, supra , 275 Ala. at 234 , 153 So.2d at 791 -92 , quoting from 50 Am.Jur.

2008A repeal will also result by implication when a comprehensive revision of a particular subject is promulgated, or upon the predication of a statewide system of administration to replace previous regulation by localities' (Footnotes omitted.) "To the same effect is this Court's observation on repeals by implication contained in Connor, supra , 275 Ala. at 234 , 153 So.2d at 791 -92 , quoting from 50 Am.Jur.

12008–2008
Whalen v. United States green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1999We went on to emphasize the qualification on that rule: "`[W]here the offenses are the same... cumulative sentences are not permitted, unless elsewhere specially authorized by Congress.' Id., at 693[, 100 S.Ct. 1432 ] (emphasis added).

11999–1999
Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co. v. Philadelphia green
scotus · 1903
2 sentences

1988Co. v. Philadelphia, 190 U.S. 160 , 166, 23 Sup.Ct. 817 [819-20], 47 L.Ed. 995 ; but the conclusion, in this respect, of our cases, as well as the tests cited above, seem[s] to us to afford the sounder, more practical rule, and will be adhered to.

1988Co. v. Philadelphia, 190 U.S. 160 , 166, 23 Sup.Ct. 817 [819-20], 47 L.Ed. 995 ; but the conclusion, in this respect, of our cases, as well as the tests cited above, seem[s] to us to afford the sounder, more practical rule, and will be adhered to.

11988–1988
Bozeman v. State green
alacrimapp · 1981
1 sentence

1986United States v. Simmons , 96 U.S. 360 , [ 6 Otto 360 ] 24 L.Ed. 819 (1877)." Wilder v. State , 401 So.2d 151 , 160 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 167 (Ala. 1981).

11986–1986
Poellnitz v. State neutral
alacrimapp · 1972
2 sentences

1975Dailey v. State, 233 Ala. 384 , 171 So. 729 ; Lancaster v. State, 214 Ala. 2 , 106 So. 617 ; Poellnitz v. State, 48 Ala.App. 196 , 263 So.2d 181 .

1975Dailey v. State, 233 Ala. 384 , 171 So. 729 ; Lancaster v. State, 214 Ala. 2 , 106 So. 617 ; Poellnitz v. State, 48 Ala.App. 196 , 263 So.2d 181 .

11975–1975
Lancaster v. State neutral
ala · 1925
2 sentences

1975Dailey v. State, 233 Ala. 384 , 171 So. 729 ; Lancaster v. State, 214 Ala. 2 , 106 So. 617 ; Poellnitz v. State, 48 Ala.App. 196 , 263 So.2d 181 .

1975Dailey v. State, 233 Ala. 384 , 171 So. 729 ; Lancaster v. State, 214 Ala. 2 , 106 So. 617 ; Poellnitz v. State, 48 Ala.App. 196 , 263 So.2d 181 .

11975–1975
Dailey v. State green
ala · 1936
2 sentences

1975Dailey v. State, 233 Ala. 384 , 171 So. 729 ; Lancaster v. State, 214 Ala. 2 , 106 So. 617 ; Poellnitz v. State, 48 Ala.App. 196 , 263 So.2d 181 .

1975Dailey v. State, 233 Ala. 384 , 171 So. 729 ; Lancaster v. State, 214 Ala. 2 , 106 So. 617 ; Poellnitz v. State, 48 Ala.App. 196 , 263 So.2d 181 .

11975–1975
Magruder v. State neutral
ala · 1867
1 sentence

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Iverson v. State neutral
ala · 1875
1 sentence

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
City Council v. National Building & Loan Ass'n neutral
· 1895
1 sentence

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile green
ala · 1955
2 sentences

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Ex Parte Webster green
ala · 1924
2 sentences

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

1963Sutherland, Statutory Construction, 3d Ed., Vol. 1, § 2021, p. 486, supra; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 , supra; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 , supra. The judgment appealed from is due to be affirmed.

11963–1963
Herring v. Griffin green
ala · 1924
2 sentences

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

1963Sutherland, Statutory Construction, 3d Ed., Vol. 1, § 2021, p. 486, supra; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 , supra; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 , supra. The judgment appealed from is due to be affirmed.

11963–1963
Shepherd v. Clements green
ala · 1931
2 sentences

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Ex Parte Jones green
ala · 1924
2 sentences

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Bell v. Hubert neutral
ala · 1923
1 sentence

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Central Iron & Coal Co. v. Pennington neutral
ala · 1923
1 sentence

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Hall v. City of Birmingham neutral
· 1925
2 sentences

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

1963“However, since there is no rule of law to prevent the repeal of a special by a later general statute, prior special or local statutes may be repealed by implication from the enactment of a later general statute where the legislative intent to effectuate a repeal is unequivocally expressed. * * * ” The foregoing principles find support in our cases, viz.: Personnel Board of Mobile County v. City of Mobile, 264 Ala. 56, 60 , 84 So.2d 365 ; Shepherd v. Clements, 224 Ala. 1, 2 , 141 So. 255 ; Ex parte Jones, 212 Ala. 259, 261 , 102 So. 234 ; Herring v. Griffin, 211 Ala. 225, 226 , 100 So. 202 ; T

11963–1963
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Kirkpatrick, Dunn & Co. green
ala · 1895
1 sentence

1929Co. v. Kirkpatrick, etc., Co., 111 Ala. 456 , 20 So. 651 , quoted approvingly in Singleterry v. Varnum, 200 Ala. 142 , 75 So. 890 .

11929–1929
Singleterry v. Varnum neutral
ala · 1917
11929–1929
Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Taff neutral
ala · 1912
11919–1919
Hodges v. Winston neutral
· 1891
11919–1919
Clark v. Griffin neutral
mass · 1889
11915–1915
Rankin v. Dean neutral
ala · 1911
11915–1915
Rea v. Longstreet & Sedgwick green
ala · 1875
11915–1915
Chandler v. Spear green
vt · 1850
11911–1911

Where else courts name it

CA 60 (1861–2025) TX 46 (1880–2026) NY 30 (1849–2018) AL 22 (1908–2025) MO 22 (1887–2012) IL 20 (1881–1998) NV 20 (2010–2020) GA 17 (1902–2025) FL 16 (1908–2023) KS 14 (1904–2016) VA 13 (1886–2008) WA 12 (1892–2023) WV 12 (1893–1991) TN 11 (1926–2015) CO 11 (1893–2026) IN 10 (1871–2010) AZ 9 (1925–2014) MD 9 (1883–2018) NJ 9 (1954–2024) KY 8 (1922–1963) OR 7 (1908–2017) OK 7 (1917–1994) MA 7 (1886–1984) NC 7 (1891–1989) CT 6 (1885–2014) WI 6 (1881–1996) PA 6 (1863–2002) IA 5 (1902–1975) ND 5 (1903–1995) MT 5 (1895–1979) MS 4 (1953–2025) DE 4 (1965–2024) NM 4 (1938–2015) OH 4 (1884–1984) HI 3 (1927–2026) VT 3 (1894–1934) NE 3 (1930–1974) MN 3 (1904–1962) SC 3 (1925–2019) VI 2 (2014–2017) MI 2 (1974–1997) UT 2 (1951–1968) DC 2 (1896–1985) WY 2 (1925–1970) ME 2 (1954–2023) LA 2 (2004–2006) ID 2 (1965–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check