language of the arbitration clause in Connecticut

2000"Whether an agreement makes arbitration a condition precedent to an action in court depends on the language of the arbitration clause." Multi-Service Contractors, Inc. v. Vernon, 181 Conn. 445 , 447 , 435 A.2d 983 (1980).

2000"Whether an agreement makes arbitration a condition precedent to an action in court depends on the language of the arbitration clause." Multi-Service Contractors, Inc. v. Vernon, 181 Conn. 445 , 447 , 435 A.2d 983 (1980).

1983“Wliere the language of the arbitration clause indicates an intention on the part of the parties to include all controversies which may arise under their agreement, and where the record reveals no specific questions which the parties submitted to the arbitrator, the submission will be construed as unrestricted.” Carroll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra, 20; Malecki v. Burnham, 181 Conn. 211, 213 , 435 A.2d 13 (1980).

1983“Wliere the language of the arbitration clause indicates an intention on the part of the parties to include all controversies which may arise under their agreement, and where the record reveals no specific questions which the parties submitted to the arbitrator, the submission will be construed as unrestricted.” Carroll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., supra, 20; Malecki v. Burnham, 181 Conn. 211, 213 , 435 A.2d 13 (1980).

1993"Specific designation of arbitrable matters is CT Page 3005 unnecessary where the language of the arbitration clause indicates an intention of the parties to include all controversies which may arise under the principal agreement between them." Id. at 473 .

1978Floryan & Co., 158 Conn. 467, 473 , 262 A.2d 159 .

1991Carroll v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 189 Conn. 16 , 20 , 453 A.2d 1158 (1983).

1991Carroll v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 189 Conn. 16 , 20 , 453 A.2d 1158 (1983).

2025The Appellate Court has held that an arbitration clause that provided ‘‘[a]ny controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to this agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration . . .’’ is unrestricted because it ‘‘contained no language restricting the breadth of issues, reserving explicit rights, or conditioning the award on court review.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224 , 227 n.3, 230, 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).

2025The Appellate Court has held that an arbitration clause that provided ‘‘[a]ny controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to this agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration . . .’’ is unrestricted because it ‘‘contained no language restricting the breadth of issues, reserving explicit rights, or conditioning the award on court review.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224 , 227 n.3, 230, 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).

2025The Appellate Court has held that an arbitration clause that provided ‘‘[a]ny controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to this agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration . . .’’ is unrestricted because it ‘‘contained no language restricting the breadth of issues, reserving explicit rights, or conditioning the award on court review.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224 , 227 n.3, 230, 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).

2025The Appellate Court has held that an arbitration clause that provided ‘‘[a]ny controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to this agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration . . .’’ is unrestricted because it ‘‘contained no language restricting the breadth of issues, reserving explicit rights, or conditioning the award on court review.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224 , 227 n.3, 230, 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).

2008The agreement for submission constitutes the charter for the entire ensuing arbitration proceedings.” (Citations omitted.) Vail v. American Way Homes, Inc., 181 Conn. 449, 451 , 435 A.2d 993 (1980). *408 “Where the language of the arbitration clause indicates an intention on the part of the parties to include all controversies which may arise under their agreement, and where the record reveals no specific questions which the parties submitted to the arbitrator, the submission will be construed as unrestricted. . . .

2008The agreement for submission constitutes the charter for the entire ensuing arbitration proceedings.” (Citations omitted.) Vail v. American Way Homes, Inc., 181 Conn. 449, 451 , 435 A.2d 993 (1980). *408 “Where the language of the arbitration clause indicates an intention on the part of the parties to include all controversies which may arise under their agreement, and where the record reveals no specific questions which the parties submitted to the arbitrator, the submission will be construed as unrestricted. . . .

2004See, e.g., Garrity v. McCaskey, 223 Conn. 1, 4-5 , 612 A.2d 742 (1992); International Assn. of Fire Fighters, Local 1339, AFL-CIO v. Waterbury, 35 Conn. App. 775, 778 , 647 A.2d 361 (1994).

2004See, e.g., Garrity v. McCaskey, 223 Conn. 1, 4-5 , 612 A.2d 742 (1992); International Assn. of Fire Fighters, Local 1339, AFL-CIO v. Waterbury, 35 Conn. App. 775, 778 , 647 A.2d 361 (1994).

2003Id.

2001The intention to have arbitrability determined by an arbitrator can be manifested by an express provision or through the use of broad terms to describe the scope of arbitration, such as all questions in dispute and all claims arising out of the contract or any dispute that cannot be adjudicated." (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted.) International Marine Holdings, Inc. v. Stauff, 44 Conn. App. 664 , CT Page 14886 668 (1997). 4 Here the language of the arbitration clause is exceedingly broad, covering "any and all disputes, differences, controversies or claims pertaining to or arisi

2000The court read the language of the arbitration clause in Fink as "all-embracing, all-encompassing and CT Page 11084 broad." Id.

1998Thus, though such findings have been made in cases "where the contract called for the submission to arbitration of `[a]ny dispute that cannot be adjudicated between the Employer and the Union'; International Brotherhood v. Trudon Platt Motor Lines, Inc. , 146 Conn. 17 , 20 , 147 A.2d 484 [(1958)]; and where arbitration was required of `[a]ll questions in dispute and all claims arising out of said contract'; Liggett v. Torrington Building Co. , 114 Conn. 425 , 430 , 158 A. 917 [(1932);]" Policemen's Firemen's Retirement Board v. Sullivan , 173 Conn. 1 , 6 , 376 A.2d 399 (1977); they have been r

1998Thus, though such findings have been made in cases "where the contract called for the submission to arbitration of `[a]ny dispute that cannot be adjudicated between the Employer and the Union'; International Brotherhood v. Trudon Platt Motor Lines, Inc. , 146 Conn. 17 , 20 , 147 A.2d 484 [(1958)]; and where arbitration was required of `[a]ll questions in dispute and all claims arising out of said contract'; Liggett v. Torrington Building Co. , 114 Conn. 425 , 430 , 158 A. 917 [(1932);]" Policemen's Firemen's Retirement Board v. Sullivan , 173 Conn. 1 , 6 , 376 A.2d 399 (1977); they have been r

1998Thus, though such findings have been made in cases "where the contract called for the submission to arbitration of `[a]ny dispute that cannot be adjudicated between the Employer and the Union'; International Brotherhood v. Trudon Platt Motor Lines, Inc. , 146 Conn. 17 , 20 , 147 A.2d 484 [(1958)]; and where arbitration was required of `[a]ll questions in dispute and all claims arising out of said contract'; Liggett v. Torrington Building Co. , 114 Conn. 425 , 430 , 158 A. 917 [(1932);]" Policemen's Firemen's Retirement Board v. Sullivan , 173 Conn. 1 , 6 , 376 A.2d 399 (1977); they have been r

1998Thus, though such findings have been made in cases "where the contract called for the submission to arbitration of `[a]ny dispute that cannot be adjudicated between the Employer and the Union'; International Brotherhood v. Trudon Platt Motor Lines, Inc. , 146 Conn. 17 , 20 , 147 A.2d 484 [(1958)]; and where arbitration was required of `[a]ll questions in dispute and all claims arising out of said contract'; Liggett v. Torrington Building Co. , 114 Conn. 425 , 430 , 158 A. 917 [(1932);]" Policemen's Firemen's Retirement Board v. Sullivan , 173 Conn. 1 , 6 , 376 A.2d 399 (1977); they have been r

1998Thus, though such findings have been made in cases "where the contract called for the submission to arbitration of `[a]ny dispute that cannot be adjudicated between the Employer and the Union'; International Brotherhood v. Trudon Platt Motor Lines, Inc. , 146 Conn. 17 , 20 , 147 A.2d 484 [(1958)]; and where arbitration was required of `[a]ll questions in dispute and all claims arising out of said contract'; Liggett v. Torrington Building Co. , 114 Conn. 425 , 430 , 158 A. 917 [(1932);]" Policemen's Firemen's Retirement Board v. Sullivan , 173 Conn. 1 , 6 , 376 A.2d 399 (1977); they have been r

1998Thus, though such findings have been made in cases "where the contract called for the submission to arbitration of `[a]ny dispute that cannot be adjudicated between the Employer and the Union'; International Brotherhood v. Trudon Platt Motor Lines, Inc. , 146 Conn. 17 , 20 , 147 A.2d 484 [(1958)]; and where arbitration was required of `[a]ll questions in dispute and all claims arising out of said contract'; Liggett v. Torrington Building Co. , 114 Conn. 425 , 430 , 158 A. 917 [(1932);]" Policemen's Firemen's Retirement Board v. Sullivan , 173 Conn. 1 , 6 , 376 A.2d 399 (1977); they have been r

1993In Two Sisters, Inc. v. Gosch Co., 171 Conn. 493 (1976), the plaintiff attempted court action to rescind a contract claiming the agreement was fraudulently induced.