Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1945–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Carsongreen2 sentences2011State v. Carson, 941 S.W.2d 518, 520 (Mo. banc 1997) ("If an instruction *144 following MAI-CR 3d conflicts with the substantive law, any court should decline to follow MAI-CR 3d or its Notes on Use.”). 1999It must be knowingly done, or it is not punishable under § 195.223.” Emmett correctly points out that in State v. Carson, 941 S.W.2d 518 (Mo. banc 1997) — decided after Emmett’s arrest but before the trial court found him guilty— the Supreme Court of Missouri held that when a suspect is charged with trafficking drugs in the second degree in violation of § 195.228.2(2) by bringing drugs into Missouri, the prosecutor must prove the suspect knew or was aware that what he was bringing was a controlled substance. | 1 | 2 |
Wagner v. Bowyergreen1 sentence2020The Missouri Supreme Court’s recent opinions in Mitchell v. Jones, No. SC97631, 2020 WL 547402 (Mo. banc Feb. 4, 2020), and Woods v. Missouri Department of Corrections, 3 Because a defendant is sentenced according to the law in effect at the time the offense was committed, Wagner v. Bowyer, 559 S.W.3d 26, 30 (Mo. App. E.D. 2018), all references to section 195.295 are to the REVISED STATUTES OF MISSOURI 2000, as updated through the 2001 Supplement. 4 No. SC97633, 2020 WL 548567 (Mo. banc Feb. 4, 2020), govern our disposition of this appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2018To demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, a movant must show that counsel's performance (1) "did not conform to the degree of skill, care, and diligence of a reasonably competent attorney[,]" and (2) "that movant was thereby prejudiced." Skillicorn v. State , 22 S.W.3d 678 , 681 (Mo. banc 2000) (internal quotations omitted); see also Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 2018To demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, a movant must show that counsel's performance (1) "did not conform to the degree of skill, care, and diligence of a reasonably competent attorney[,]" and (2) "that movant was thereby prejudiced." Skillicorn v. State , 22 S.W.3d 678 , 681 (Mo. banc 2000) (internal quotations omitted); see also Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Edwards v. Gersteingreen1 sentence2014"When interpreting statutes, courts do not presume that the legislature has enacted a meaningless provision." Edwards v. Gerstein, 237 S.W.3d 580, 581 (Mo. banc 2007). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Measegreen1 sentence1997State v. Mease, 842 S.W.2d 98, 112 (Mo. banc 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 918 , 113 S.Ct. 2363 , 124 L.Ed.2d 269 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Santillangreen1 sentence1997Santillan , at 576. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Olsongreen1 sentence1991However, instruction on a lesser included offense is required only when “there is some affirmative evidence of a lack of an essential element of the higher offense which would not only authorize acquittal of the higher, but sustain conviction of the lesser.” State v. Olson, 636 S.W.2d 318, 322 [6] (Mo. banc 1982). | 1 | 1 |
State ex rel. Pruitt v. Adamsgreen1 sentence1991Id. at 742, 743 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sloangreen1 sentence1981In order to sustain a conviction for burglary in the second degree there must be evidence of a forcible breaking and entering into a building. 3 State v. Williams, 416 S.W.2d 71, 72 (Mo.1967); State v. Ewing, 298 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Mo.1957); State v. Sloan, 548 S.W.2d 633, 637 (Mo.App.1977). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ewinggreen1 sentence1981In order to sustain a conviction for burglary in the second degree there must be evidence of a forcible breaking and entering into a building. 3 State v. Williams, 416 S.W.2d 71, 72 (Mo.1967); State v. Ewing, 298 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Mo.1957); State v. Sloan, 548 S.W.2d 633, 637 (Mo.App.1977). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence1981In order to sustain a conviction for burglary in the second degree there must be evidence of a forcible breaking and entering into a building. 3 State v. Williams, 416 S.W.2d 71, 72 (Mo.1967); State v. Ewing, 298 S.W.2d 439, 443 (Mo.1957); State v. Sloan, 548 S.W.2d 633, 637 (Mo.App.1977). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fostergreen2 sentences1977A second degree murder instruction was required — and given — because it is the duty of the court to give instructions which cover “ ‘all the essential elements of an offense embraced within the charge,’ ” or, as put another way, the instructions must declare the law “ ‘applicable to every crime, or grade of crime, of which, under the evidence, the jury might convict the accused.’ ” State v. Foster, 355 Mo. 577 , 197 S.W.2d 313, 317-318 (1946). 1977A second degree murder instruction was required — and given — because it is the duty of the court to give instructions which cover “ ‘all the essential elements of an offense embraced within the charge,’ ” or, as put another way, the instructions must declare the law “ ‘applicable to every crime, or grade of crime, of which, under the evidence, the jury might convict the accused.’ ” State v. Foster, 355 Mo. 577 , 197 S.W.2d 313, 317-318 (1946). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Skillicorn v. State
green
1 sentence2018To demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, a movant must show that counsel's performance (1) "did not conform to the degree of skill, care, and diligence of a reasonably competent attorney[,]" and (2) "that movant was thereby prejudiced." Skillicorn v. State , 22 S.W.3d 678 , 681 (Mo. banc 2000) (internal quotations omitted); see also Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Leisure
green
1 sentence2003Leisure, 796 S.W.2d at 878 ; § 545.030.1(16). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Johnson v. Hunter
green
1 sentence1997State v. Mease, 842 S.W.2d 98, 112 (Mo. banc 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 918 , 113 S.Ct. 2363 , 124 L.Ed.2d 269 (1993). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Adderly v. United States
green
1 sentence1997State v. Mease, 842 S.W.2d 98, 112 (Mo. banc 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 918 , 113 S.Ct. 2363 , 124 L.Ed.2d 269 (1993). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Johnson v. Oklahoma
green
1 sentence1997State v. Mease, 842 S.W.2d 98, 112 (Mo. banc 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 918 , 113 S.Ct. 2363 , 124 L.Ed.2d 269 (1993). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. McKinney
green
2 sentences1988Trader Bob’s, Inc., the corporate owner of the adult bookstore in State v. McKinney, 756 S.W.2d 527 Nos. 69956 and 69957, was convicted in case No. 69958 of six counts of promoting pornography in the second degree in violation of section 573.030, RSMo 1978, and was fined a total of $30,000. 1988Trader Bob's, Inc., the corporate owner of the adult bookstore in State v. McKinney, 756 S.W.2d 527 Nos. 69956 and 69957, was convicted in case No. 69958 of six counts of promoting pornography in the second degree in violation of section 573.030, RSMo 1978, and was fined a total of $30,000. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Miller v. California
green
2 sentences1988The appeals were transferred to this Court by the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, for answer to appellants’ claim that under the decisions in Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 , 107 S.Ct. 1918 , 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987), and Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), the definition of “pornographic” embodied in section 573.-010 is unconstitutional. 1988The appeals were transferred to this Court by the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, for answer to appellants’ claim that under the decisions in Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 , 107 S.Ct. 1918 , 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987), and Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), the definition of “pornographic” embodied in section 573.-010 is unconstitutional. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Pope v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1988The appeals were transferred to this Court by the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, for answer to appellants’ claim that under the decisions in Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 , 107 S.Ct. 1918 , 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987), and Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), the definition of “pornographic” embodied in section 573.-010 is unconstitutional. 1988The appeals were transferred to this Court by the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, for answer to appellants’ claim that under the decisions in Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497 , 107 S.Ct. 1918 , 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987), and Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), the definition of “pornographic” embodied in section 573.-010 is unconstitutional. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Shriver
green
1 sentence1987In State v. Shriver, 275 S.W.2d 304 (Mo.1955), the accused was convicted of murder in the second degree in violation of § 559.-020, RSMo 1949, a statute identical with § 565.004, RSMo 1978. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Treadway
green
1 sentence1979State v. Treadway, supra. Defendant was charged with both burglary in the second degree in violation of § 560.080 RSMo. 1969, and with possession of burglar’s tools in violation of § 560.115 RSMo. 1969. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Howard
neutral
2 sentences1974The appellant cites State v. Howard, 354 Mo. 38 , 188 S.W.2d 17 (1945), in which an instruction on murder in the second degree referred to self-defense but failed to notice the additional defense of insanity. 1974The appellant cites State v. Howard, 354 Mo. 38 , 188 S.W.2d 17 (1945), in which an instruction on murder in the second degree referred to self-defense but failed to notice the additional defense of insanity. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
State v. Cuckovich
green
1 sentence1974State v. Cuckovich, supra, cited in Johnson, and decided by the Court en banc in 1972, holds that the fact that the evidence in a homicide case is circumstantial does not require an instruction on lesser degrees in a first degree murder case. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
State v. Bradley
green
2 sentences1968State v. Bradley, 361 Mo. 267 , 234 S.W.2d 556 [21]; State v. King, 342 Mo. 1067 , 119 S.W.2d 322 [8]. 1968State v. Bradley, 361 Mo. 267 , 234 S.W.2d 556 [21]; State v. King, 342 Mo. 1067 , 119 S.W.2d 322 [8]. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
State v. King
green
2 sentences1968State v. Bradley, 361 Mo. 267 , 234 S.W.2d 556 [21]; State v. King, 342 Mo. 1067 , 119 S.W.2d 322 [8]. 1968State v. Bradley, 361 Mo. 267 , 234 S.W.2d 556 [21]; State v. King, 342 Mo. 1067 , 119 S.W.2d 322 [8]. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
State v. Malone
green
2 sentences1953In State v. Malone, 327 Mo. 1217 , 39 S.W.2d 786 , *800 790, the conviction was of murder in the second degree and the instruction plainly placed upon the defendant the burden of proving that he acted in self-defense, despite the state's burden of proving malice. 1953In State v. Malone, 327 Mo. 1217 , 39 S.W.2d 786 , *800 790, the conviction was of murder in the second degree and the instruction plainly placed upon the defendant the burden of proving that he acted in self-defense, despite the state's burden of proving malice. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Erb
neutral
1 sentence1945State v. Kyles, 247 Mo. 640 , 153 S.W. 1047 ; State v. Erb, 74 Mo. 199 . | 1 | 1945–1945 |
State v. Kyles
green
2 sentences1945State v. Kyles, 247 Mo. 640 , 153 S.W. 1047 ; State v. Erb, 74 Mo. 199 . 1945State v. Kyles, 247 Mo. 640 , 153 S.W. 1047 ; State v. Erb, 74 Mo. 199 . | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.