Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hendersongreen2 sentences2001Similarly, in State v. Henderson, 114 Wn.2d 867, 869-71 , 792 P.2d 514 (1990), the Court followed its decision in Boyer and applied the invited error doctrine to bar review of petitioner’s argument that the trial court erred in adopting petitioner’s proposed attempted burglary in the second degree instruction, because the instruction failed to require proof of the specific crime or crimes actually intended during the attempted robbery. 4 In response to petitioner’s claim that constitutional error may be raised for the first time on appeal, the Court responded: “This argument misses the point, 2001Similarly, in State v. Henderson, 114 Wn.2d 867, 869-71 , 792 P.2d 514 (1990), the Court followed its decision in Boyer and applied the invited error doctrine to bar review of petitioner’s argument that the trial court erred in adopting petitioner’s proposed attempted burglary in the second degree instruction, because the instruction failed to require proof of the specific crime or crimes actually intended during the attempted robbery. 4 In response to petitioner’s claim that constitutional error may be raised for the first time on appeal, the Court responded: “This argument misses the point, | 1 | 2 |
State v. Haywardgreen1 sentence2021See State v. Hayward, 152 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kier
green
2 sentences2025First, looking at the jury instructions, the Kier court noted that the “to convict” jury instruction on the robbery in the first degree count did not identify a victim, but the assault in the second degree instruction specified Ellison was the victim, so “a reasonable jury [could] conclude that the robbery instruction applied equally to Hudson or Ellison, or both.” Id. at 812 . 2025Second, proof of robbery does not require the specific identity of the victim or victims, but where “the jury heard evidence describing both Hudson and Ellison as victims of the robbery and the instruction did not specify a victim, the basis for Kier’s conviction is ambiguous.” Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Lyon
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. McKAGUE
green
2 sentences2015To convict Tanzy of assault in the second degree in violation of RCW 9A.36.021(1)(a),1 the State had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Tanzy (1) intentionally assaulted Carter and (2) recklessly caused "substantial bodily harm." See State v. McKague, 172 Wn.2d 802, 805 , 262 P.3d 1225 (2011). 2015To convict Tanzy of assault in the second degree in violation of RCW 9A.36.021(1)(a),1 the State had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Tanzy (1) intentionally assaulted Carter and (2) recklessly caused "substantial bodily harm." See State v. McKague, 172 Wn.2d 802, 805 , 262 P.3d 1225 (2011). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Leyda
green
1 sentence2010Id. at 345, 138 P.3d 610 . ¶ 6 In August 2006, the State sentenced case I, case II, and a third case filed under a separate cause number resulting in a total term of confinement of 141 months. ¶ 7 In December 2006, the State, in King County, charged Newlun with identity theft in the second degree in violation of former RCW 9.35.020(1) and .020(3). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Smallwood
green
1 sentence2001Id. at 907-08, 14 P.3d 863 (Schultheis, J., dissenting). [4] Bratz further noted that the case upon which Henderson relied as persuasive authority, State v. Smallwood, 346 A.2d 164 (Del.1975), has been so limited by the Delaware Supreme Court in Deshields v. State, 706 A.2d 502 (Del.1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Deshields v. State
green
1 sentence2001Id. at 907-08, 14 P.3d 863 (Schultheis, J., dissenting). [4] Bratz further noted that the case upon which Henderson relied as persuasive authority, State v. Smallwood, 346 A.2d 164 (Del.1975), has been so limited by the Delaware Supreme Court in Deshields v. State, 706 A.2d 502 (Del.1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Barker
green
1 sentence2001Id. at 907-08, 14 P.3d 863 (Schultheis, J., dissenting). [4] Bratz further noted that the case upon which Henderson relied as persuasive authority, State v. Smallwood, 346 A.2d 164 (Del.1975), has been so limited by the Delaware Supreme Court in Deshields v. State, 706 A.2d 502 (Del.1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
North Carolina v. Alford
green
2 sentences1991Jackson entered a plea of guilty under North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 27 L. 1991Jackson entered a plea of guilty under North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 27 L. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.