20 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
King v. Thigpengreen2 sentences2009See King v. Thigpen, 441 So.2d 1365 (Miss.1983); King v. Thigpen, 446 So.2d 600 (Miss. 1984). 2009See King v. Thigpen, 441 So.2d 1365 (Miss.1983); King v. Thigpen, 446 So.2d 600 (Miss.1984). | 5 | 7 |
King v. Thigpengreen2 sentences2009See King v. Thigpen, 441 So.2d 1365 (Miss.1983); King v. Thigpen, 446 So.2d 600 (Miss. 1984). 2009See King v. Thigpen, 441 So.2d 1365 (Miss.1983); King v. Thigpen, 446 So.2d 600 (Miss.1984). | 2 | 6 |
Caston v. Stategreen2 sentences2003See Caston v. State, 823 So.2d 473 , 487-88 *717 (Miss.2002) (Co-defendants did not seek to exculpate themselves at defendant' expense). ś 24. 2001See Caston v. State, 823 So. 2d 473, 487-88 (Miss. 2002) (Co-defendants did not seek to exculpate themselves at defendant’ expense). ¶24. | 2 | 2 |
Fulgham v. Stategreen1 sentence2020See Fulgham v. State, 47 So. 3d 698, 700 (¶6) (Miss. 2010) (holding that “a conviction under an unconstitutionally vague statute” is not subject to the UPCCRA’s procedural bars). 3 language of the statute as it appeared in the 1992 General Laws. | 1 | 1 |
Henderson v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Citing Henderson v. State, 783 So.2d 769, 771 (¶4) (Miss.Ct.App.2000), MDOC further argues that King’s claim fails because it relies on assertions in his brief, rather than facts in the record. 2016Citing Henderson v. State, 783 So.2d 769, 771 (¶4) (Miss.Ct.App.2000), MDOC further argues that King’s claim fails because it relies on assertions in his brief, rather than facts in the record. | 1 | 1 |
Buelow v. Glidewellgreen2 sentences2015The chancellor dismissed King’s claim to establish a boundary line, because he “didn’t think the evidence was compelling enough.” See Buelow v. Glidewell, 757 So. 2d 216, 220 (¶12) (Miss. 2012) (directing that a Rule 41(b) motion “should be granted if the plaintiff has failed to prove one or more essential elements of his claim or if the quality of the proof offered is insufficient to sustain the plaintiff's burden of proof”). 2015The chancellor dismissed King’s claim to establish a boundary line, because he “didn’t think the evidence was compelling enough.” See Buelow v. Glidewell, 757 So.2d 216, 220 (¶ 12) (Miss.2000) (di recting that a Rule 41(b) motion “should be granted if the plaintiff has failed to prove one or more essential elements of his claim or if the quality of the proof offered is insufficient to sustain the plaintiffs burden of proof’). | 1 | 1 |
Floyd v. Floydgreen2 sentences2015Because we will not disturb a chancellor’s finding of fact when it is supported by substantial evidence from the record, Floyd v. Floyd, 949 So. 2d 26, 28 (¶5) (Miss. 2007), we find King’s claim for a prescriptive easement to walk across Gale’s property also fails. ¶23. 2015Because we will not disturb a chancellor’s finding of fact when it is supported by substantial evidence from the record, Floyd v. Floyd, 949 So.2d 26, 28 (¶ 5) (Miss.2007), we find King’s claim for a prescriptive easement to walk across Gale’s property also fails. •¶ 23. | 1 | 1 |
Read v. Southern Pine Elec. Power Ass'ngreen1 sentence2004See Southern Pine, 515 So.2d at 920 . | 1 | 1 |
King v. Stategreen1 sentence2004In King v. State, 857 So.2d 702, 726 (¶¶ 77-80) (Miss.2003), David Earl King's previous criminal prosecution, the Mississippi Supreme Court upheld the trial court's denial of King's motion to suppress *989 certain evidence seized pursuant to an illegal search and seizure. | 1 | 1 |
Baldwin v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Id.; Davis, 767 So. 2d at 993-94 ; Baldwin v. State, 732 So. 2d 236, 241 (Miss. 1999); Burrell, 613 So. 2d at 1189-90. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Havard v. State
green
2 sentences2007Citing Havard v. State, 928 So.2d 771 (Miss.2006), the State argues that this victim impact evidence was admissible, and therefore, the trial court did not err in overruling King's motion for mistrial. 2007Citing Havard v. State, 928 So.2d 771 (Miss.2006), the State argues that this victim impact evidence was admissible, and therefore, the trial court did not err in overruling King’s motion for mistrial. | 3 | 2003–2007 |
Meiboom v. Watson
green
2 sentences2014In Meiboom v. Watson, 128 N.M. 536 , 994 P.2d 1154 (2000), the lower court granted a motion to reinstate after dismissal for failure to prosecute despite the district court’s characterization of the motion as “the barest motion I’ve seen in ten years on the bench.” Id. at 538 , 994 P.2d 1154 . 2014In Meiboom v. Watson, 128 N.M. 536 , 994 P.2d 1154 (2000), the lower court granted a motion to reinstate after dismissal for failure to prosecute despite the district court’s characterization of the motion as “the barest motion I’ve seen in ten years on the bench.” Id. at 538 , 994 P.2d 1154 . | 2 | 2012–2014 |
Tolbert v. State
green
2 sentences2002Further, King also notes that a "review of the record shows that, at best, this evidence would have only aided King's defense; it was not a necessary element of it." Id. 1999Further, King also notes that a "review of the record shows that, at best, this evidence would have only aided King's defense; it was not a necessary element of it." Id. | 2 | 1999–2002 |
Howell v. State
green
1 sentence2007The parties stipulated that the testimony of the second witness, Ms. Jourdan, would be the same as Dalrymple's testimony. [12] These articles come from the Commercial Dispatch, the Clarion â Ledger of Jackson, MS, the Commercial Appeal of Memphis, TN and Associated Press state and local wire stories. [13] Note that at the time Berryhill was decided, the statute of limitations for bringing a post-conviction action was three years. [14] The issue presented by King references a "22-year incarceration;" however, in his brief, King states that he has been on death row for 25 years. [15] "A mitigati | 1 | 2007–2007 |
King v. State
green
1 sentence2006King v. State, 788 So.2d 868 (Miss.Ct.App.2001). ¶ 4. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Davis v. State
green
1 sentence2003Id.; Davis, 767 So. 2d at 993-94 ; Baldwin v. State, 732 So. 2d 236, 241 (Miss. 1999); Burrell, 613 So. 2d at 1189-90. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Pharr v. Anderson
green
2 sentences1985Language in the opinion suggests that the King rule was "consulted" to determine the competence of the testimony of a medical expert. 436 So.2d at 1359 . 1985Language in the opinion suggests that the King rule was "consulted" to determine the competence of the testimony of a medical expert. 436 So.2d at 1359 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Holmes v. Elliott
green
2 sentences1985Holmes v. Elliott, 443 So.2d 825 (Miss. 1983), arose out of events occurring in September of 1977. 1985Holmes v. Elliott, 443 So.2d 825 (Miss. 1983), arose out of events occurring in September of 1977. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
King v. State
green
2 sentences1968We concluded that there could be “no question as to the voluntary character of King’s plea of guilty to the charge of murder.” Id. at 923 , 183 So.2d at 497 . 1968We concluded that there could be “no question as to the voluntary character of King’s plea of guilty to the charge of murder.” Id. at 923 , 183 So.2d at 497 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
United States v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1968In April 1968 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968). 1968In April 1968 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 , 88 S.Ct. 1209 , 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968). | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.