King factors in Washington

2011Smith, 170 Wn.2d at 733 (citing In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Walgren, 104 Wn.2d 557, 569 , 708 P.2d 380 (1985) (discussing collateral consequences of a felony conviction under Washington law)). ¶17 We hold that King’s plea of guilty provided conclusive evidence of guilt under ELC 10.14(c) to support his disbarment.

2011Smith, 170 Wn.2d at 733 (citing In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Walgren, 104 Wn.2d 557, 569 , 708 P.2d 380 (1985) (discussing collateral consequences of a felony conviction under Washington law)). ¶17 We hold that King’s plea of guilty provided conclusive evidence of guilt under ELC 10.14(c) to support his disbarment.

2007Griggs, 92 Wash.2d at 583 , 599 P.2d 1289 ; see, e.g., 10A Wright, Miller & Kane, supra, § 2697, at 163 (the underlying concern is to determine whether there is some possibility that the outcome of the suit, after a full trial, will be contrary to the result achieved by default).

2007Griggs, 92 Wn.2d at 583 ; see, e.g., 10A Wright, Miller & Kane, supra, § 2697, at 163 (the underlying concern is to determine whether there is some possibility that the outcome of the suit, after a full trial, will be contrary to the result achieved by default).

1996In its opinion in Pens , the Ninth Circuit found that the patients at Western State were informed that their disclosures were confidential: "The WSH therapists assured Pens information he revealed during treatment would not be disclosed to the courts." Pens, 902 F.2d at 1465 .

1996In its opinion in Pens , the Ninth Circuit found that the patients at Western State were informed that their disclosures were confidential: "The WSH therapists assured Pens information he revealed during treatment would not be disclosed to the courts.” Pens, 902 F.2d at 1465 .

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2024Applying the King factors, we note that Voigtlaender testified as a law enforcement officer, which can be particularly prejudicial because “police officers’ testimony carries an ‘aura of reliability.’” State v. Montgomery, 163 Wn.2d 577, 595 , 183 P.3d 267 (2008) (quoting State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 765 , 30 P.3d 1278 (2001)).

2021There is no evidence in the record to support an Evangelical/King analysis,” citing Evangelical United Brethren Church of Adna v. State, 67 Wn.2d 246 , 407 P. 2d 440 (1965) and Chambers-Castanes, 100 Wn.2d at 275 .

2021There is no evidence in the record to support an Evangelical/King analysis,” citing Evangelical United Brethren Church of Adna v. State, 67 Wn.2d 246 , 407 P. 2d 440 (1965) and Chambers-Castanes, 100 Wn.2d at 275 .

2021There is no evidence in the record to support an Evangelical/King analysis,” citing Evangelical United Brethren Church of Adna v. State, 67 Wn.2d 246 , 407 P. 2d 440 (1965) and Chambers-Castanes, 100 Wn.2d at 275 .

2013I could be here all night going in and picking out all of the 63 State v. Thorgerson. 172 Wn.2d 438, 451 , 258 P.3d 43 (2011). 64 State v. Russell. 125 Wn.2d 24, 87 , 882 P.2d 747 (1994). 65 id, 66RP(Jan. 24, 2011) at 133. 67 Id. at 134 . 15 No. 67413-7-1/16 misrepresentations that were made. ..68 The prosecutor later stated, "It's not a crime for Mr. Rosier to have a gun in the car."69 King objected.

2013I could be here all night going in and picking out all of the 63 State v. Thorgerson. 172 Wn.2d 438, 451 , 258 P.3d 43 (2011). 64 State v. Russell. 125 Wn.2d 24, 87 , 882 P.2d 747 (1994). 65 id, 66RP(Jan. 24, 2011) at 133. 67 Id. at 134 . 15 No. 67413-7-1/16 misrepresentations that were made. ..68 The prosecutor later stated, "It's not a crime for Mr. Rosier to have a gun in the car."69 King objected.

2013DISCUSSION Where the provisions of CR 41(b)(1) apply, dismissal for want of prosecution "is mandatory; there is no room for the exercise of a trial court's discretion." Snohomish County v. Thorp Meats. 110 Wn.2d 163, 167 , 750 P.2d 1251 (1988).

2013DISCUSSION Where the provisions of CR 41(b)(1) apply, dismissal for want of prosecution "is mandatory; there is no room for the exercise of a trial court's discretion." Snohomish County v. Thorp Meats. 110 Wn.2d 163, 167 , 750 P.2d 1251 (1988).

2013I could be here all night going in and picking out all of the 63 State v. Thorgerson. 172 Wn.2d 438, 451 , 258 P.3d 43 (2011). 64 State v. Russell. 125 Wn.2d 24, 87 , 882 P.2d 747 (1994). 65 id, 66RP(Jan. 24, 2011) at 133. 67 Id. at 134 . 15 No. 67413-7-1/16 misrepresentations that were made. ..68 The prosecutor later stated, "It's not a crime for Mr. Rosier to have a gun in the car."69 King objected.

2013I could be here all night going in and picking out all of the 63 State v. Thorgerson. 172 Wn.2d 438, 451 , 258 P.3d 43 (2011). 64 State v. Russell. 125 Wn.2d 24, 87 , 882 P.2d 747 (1994). 65 id, 66RP(Jan. 24, 2011) at 133. 67 Id. at 134 . 15 No. 67413-7-1/16 misrepresentations that were made. ..68 The prosecutor later stated, "It's not a crime for Mr. Rosier to have a gun in the car."69 King objected.

2011Smith, ___ Wash.2d at ___, 246 P.3d 1224 (citing In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Walgren, 104 Wash.2d 557, 569 , 708 P.2d 380 (1985) (discussing collateral consequences of a felony conviction under Washington law)). ¶ 17 We hold that King's plea of guilty provided conclusive evidence of guilt under ELC 10.14(c) to support his disbarment.

2011Smith, 170 Wn.2d at 733 (citing In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Walgren, 104 Wn.2d 557, 569 , 708 P.2d 380 (1985) (discussing collateral consequences of a felony conviction under Washington law)). ¶17 We hold that King’s plea of guilty provided conclusive evidence of guilt under ELC 10.14(c) to support his disbarment.