Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
& SC16-224 Enoch D. Hall v. State of Florida & Enoch D. Hall v. Julie L. Jones, etc.green2 sentences2018See Hall, 212 So. 3d at 1031 . 2018See Hall , 212 So.3d at 1031 . | 2 | 2 |
State v. Cristoderogreen2 sentences1993See Cristodero v. State, 426 So.2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); cf. United States v. Lee, 622 F.2d 787 (5th Cir.1980). 452 So.2d at 71 . 1993See Cristodero v. State, 426 So.2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); cf. United States v. Lee, 622 F.2d 787 (5th Cir.1980). 452 So.2d at 71 . | 2 | 2 |
King v. Stategreen2 sentences1993In order for the King rule to apply to an alleged criminal conspiracy, the agreement must be that "an essential ingredient of the offense [conspired to be committed] is to be performed by, and only by, such government agent." 104 So.2d at 733 (emphasis supplied). 1993In order for the King rule to apply to an alleged criminal conspiracy, the agreement must be that "an essential ingredient of the offense [conspired to be committed] is to be performed by, and only by, such government agent." 104 So.2d at 733 (emphasis supplied). | 2 | 2 |
Turner v. Duggergreen1 sentence2026King, 89 So. 3d at 231-32 ; see also Turner v. Dugger, 614 So. 2d 1075, 1078 (Fla. 1992) (barring postconviction claims, or variations thereof, that have been raised on direct appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Joiner v. Stategreen2 sentences2017In D.avis, trial counsel raised a meritorious Batson challenge during voir dire, but failed to renew the objection before the jury was sworn in as required by Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 175-76 (Fla. 1993). 341 F.3d at 1312 . 2017In Davis, trial counsel raised a meritorious Batson challenge during voir dire, but failed to renew the objection before the jury was sworn in as required by Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174, 175-76 (Fla. 1993). 341 F.3d at 1312 . | 1 | 1 |
Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Trapeogreen1 sentence2014The trial court sustained Ms. King’s objection and found that Citizens “waived its right to neutral evaluation by actively participating in litigation.” The order did not address the argument that Citizens failed to comply with statutory and contractual notice requirements. 1 As we did in Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. Trapeo, 136 So.3d 670, 673 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), to the extent the order under review prohibits Citizens from invoking the neutral evaluation process, we grant the petition and quash the order. | 1 | 1 |
Holly v. Auldgreen1 sentence2013“When the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, there is no occasion for resorting to the rules of statutory interpretation and construction; the statute must be given its plain and obvious meaning.” Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217, 219 (Fla.1984) (quoting Ai?. | 1 | 1 |
Steinhorst v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla.1982) (“Except in cases of fundamental error, an appellate court will not consider an issue unless it was presented to the lower court.”); see also Rimmer v. State, 825 So.2d 304, 321 (Fla.2002) (“The trial court in this instance cannot be faulted for accepting the facial reason offered by the State, especially where the State’s factual assertion went unchallenged by the defense.”). | 1 | 1 |
Keene v. Stategreen1 sentence2012The postconviction court summarily denied King’s motion on the ground that a defendant “is only entitled to credit against each sentence for the time spent in jail for the charge which led to that sentence.” Keene v. State, 500 So.2d 592, 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). | 1 | 1 |
Rimmer v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla.1982) (“Except in cases of fundamental error, an appellate court will not consider an issue unless it was presented to the lower court.”); see also Rimmer v. State, 825 So.2d 304, 321 (Fla.2002) (“The trial court in this instance cannot be faulted for accepting the facial reason offered by the State, especially where the State’s factual assertion went unchallenged by the defense.”). | 1 | 1 |
Bush v. Stategreen1 sentence1993The test of admissibility of photographs is relevance, and they are "admissible where they assist the medical examiner in explaining to the jury the nature and manner in which the wounds were inflicted." Bush v. State, 461 So.2d 936, 939 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1237 , 89 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
John F. Mosley v. State of Florida & SC14-2108 John F. Mosley v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
green
2 sentences2018Mosley, 209 So. 3d at 1264 . 2018Mosley , 209 So.3d at 1264 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
United States v. Grover Lamar Lee
green
2 sentences1993See Cristodero v. State, 426 So.2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); cf. United States v. Lee, 622 F.2d 787 (5th Cir.1980). 452 So.2d at 71 . 1993See Cristodero v. State, 426 So.2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); cf. United States v. Lee, 622 F.2d 787 (5th Cir.1980). 452 So.2d at 71 . | 2 | 1984–1993 |
State v. Washington
green
2 sentences1992The supreme court in Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1992), and in State v. Washington, 594 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1992) held that "shall" means "may" and that sentencing under the habitual felony statute is permissive only. 1992The supreme court in Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1992), and in State v. Washington, 594 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1992) held that "shall" means "may" and that sentencing under the habitual felony statute is permissive only. | 2 | 1992–1992 |
Burdick v. State
green
2 sentences1992The supreme court in Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1992), and in State v. Washington, 594 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1992) held that "shall" means "may" and that sentencing under the habitual felony statute is permissive only. 1992The supreme court in Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1992), and in State v. Washington, 594 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1992) held that "shall" means "may" and that sentencing under the habitual felony statute is permissive only. | 2 | 1992–1992 |
Suarez v. State
green
2 sentences1990A trial court is not obligated to find mitigating circumstances, Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178 , 106 S.Ct. 2908 , 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986), and, contrary to King's claim, a mitigating circumstance in one proceeding is not an "ultimate fact" that collateral estoppel or the law of the case would preclude being rejected *359 on resentencing. 1990A trial court is not obligated to find mitigating circumstances, Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178 , 106 S.Ct. 2908 , 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986), and, contrary to King’s claim, a mitigating circumstance in one proceeding is not an “ultimate fact” that collateral estoppel or the law of the case would preclude being re jected on resentencing. | 2 | 1990–1990 |
Golub v. Ernst
green
2 sentences1990A trial court is not obligated to find mitigating circumstances, Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178 , 106 S.Ct. 2908 , 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986), and, contrary to King's claim, a mitigating circumstance in one proceeding is not an "ultimate fact" that collateral estoppel or the law of the case would preclude being rejected *359 on resentencing. 1990A trial court is not obligated to find mitigating circumstances, Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178 , 106 S.Ct. 2908 , 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986), and, contrary to King’s claim, a mitigating circumstance in one proceeding is not an “ultimate fact” that collateral estoppel or the law of the case would preclude being re jected on resentencing. | 2 | 1990–1990 |
Toney-El v. Lane
green
2 sentences1990A trial court is not obligated to find mitigating circumstances, Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178 , 106 S.Ct. 2908 , 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986), and, contrary to King's claim, a mitigating circumstance in one proceeding is not an "ultimate fact" that collateral estoppel or the law of the case would preclude being rejected *359 on resentencing. 1990A trial court is not obligated to find mitigating circumstances, Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178 , 106 S.Ct. 2908 , 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986), and, contrary to King’s claim, a mitigating circumstance in one proceeding is not an “ultimate fact” that collateral estoppel or the law of the case would preclude being re jected on resentencing. | 2 | 1990–1990 |
King v. State
green
2 sentences1990King v. State, 407 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1981). 1990King v. State, 407 So.2d 904 (Fla.1981). | 2 | 1990–1990 |
King v. State
green
1 sentence2026King, 89 So. 3d at 231-32 ; see also Turner v. Dugger, 614 So. 2d 1075, 1078 (Fla. 1992) (barring postconviction claims, or variations thereof, that have been raised on direct appeal). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Davis v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
green
2 sentences2017Although we do not need to consider whether prejudice resulted, having concluded that counsel did not act defi-ciently, we also reject King’s claim that he can demonstrate prejudice pursuant to Davis v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, 341 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2003). 2017Although we do not need to consider whether prejudice resulted, having concluded that counsel did not act deficiently, we also reject King’s claim that he can demonstrate prejudice pursuant to Davis v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, 341 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2003). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Carratelli v. State
green
2 sentences2017Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2007). 2017Carratelli v. State, 961 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2007). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sutton
green
1 sentence2011Rather, by en banc opinion, we recede from a portion of our earlier decision in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Sutton, 707 So.2d 760 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), and deny Mr. King’s motion for attorneys’ fees. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Murphy v. State
green
1 sentence2001King’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 is affirmed without prejudice for King to file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
King v. State
green
1 sentence1995In King v. State, 557 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), rev. denied, 564 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 1990), we held in response to King's claim that section 775.084 was unconstitutionally vague because it did not provide who should decide which qualified candidates should be habitualized that either the State or the court could initiate such classification because "there is nothing in the statute to suggest that the legislature intended otherwise." That was true in 1990. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Turcotte v. State
green
1 sentence1995It was also true in 1992 when we decided Toliver v. State, 605 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), rev. denied, 618 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1993), and in May, 1993 when we decided Turcotte v. State, 617 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Toliver v. State
green
1 sentence1995It was also true in 1992 when we decided Toliver v. State, 605 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), rev. denied, 618 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1993), and in May, 1993 when we decided Turcotte v. State, 617 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage
green
1 sentence1995Martin-Johnson, 509 So.2d at 1100 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Pugh v. United States Parole Commission
green
1 sentence1993The test of admissibility of photographs is relevance, and they are "admissible where they assist the medical examiner in explaining to the jury the nature and manner in which the wounds were inflicted." Bush v. State, 461 So.2d 936, 939 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1237 , 89 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Jones v. United States
green
1 sentence1993The test of admissibility of photographs is relevance, and they are "admissible where they assist the medical examiner in explaining to the jury the nature and manner in which the wounds were inflicted." Bush v. State, 461 So.2d 936, 939 (Fla. 1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031 , 106 S.Ct. 1237 , 89 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Taylor v. United States green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Orantes v. State green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Lloyd v. Harrison neutral | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.