after hearing in Oklahoma

19 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1904–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Thompson v. Duke Construction Co.green oklacivapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 2 sentences 1989See Thompson v. Duke Construction Co., 681 P.2d 1125 (Okl.Ct.App. 1984). 1989See Thompson v. Duke Construction Co., 681 P.2d 1125 (Okl.Ct.App.1984).	1	1
Mead v. Hellamsgreen okla · 1948 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1953–1953 2 sentences 1953See Mead v. Hellams, 200 Okla. 381 , 194 P. 2d 603 , and cases therein cited. 1953See Mead v. Hellams, 200 Okla. 381 , 194 P. 2d 603 , and cases therein cited.	1	1
Heffernon v. Higdongreen okla · 1941 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1948–1948 2 sentences 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 . 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (24)

Case	Cited	Years
Frick v. State green oklacrimapp · 1973 2 sentences 1977In Frick, supra, we held that after a defendant’s assurances of due process are met, i. e. notice, hearing, right to counsel and the right to confront accusers, acceleration is left to the discretion of the trial court after hearing all the evidence: . . 1973In the case of Frick v. State, Okl.Cr., 509 P.2d 135 (1973) this Court stated: “Although due process requires a hearing, due notice, the right to confront accusers and the right to counsel, acceleration is left to the discretion of the trial court after hearing all the evidence.	3	1973–1977
Clay v. Chenault green kyctapp · 1900 2 sentences 1934Clay v. Chenault, 108 Ky. 77 , 55 S.W. 729 ; Dulaney v. Dulaney, 25 Ky. L. 1934Clay v. Chenault, 108 Ky. 77 , 55 S.W. 729 ; Dulaney v. Dulaney, 25 Ky. L.	2	1934–1934
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Total Energy, Inc. green okla · 1972 2 sentences 2010Oklahoma Gas And Electric Co. v. Total Energy, 1972 OK 108 , 499 P.2d 917 , ¶ 36 citing Bartlesville Electric Light and Power Co. v. Bartlesville Interurban Ry. 2010Oklahoma Gas And Electric Co. v. Total Energy, 1972 OK 108 , 499 P.2d 917 , ¶ 36 citing Bartlesville Electric Light and Power Co. v. Bartlesville Interurban Ry.	1	2010–2010
Hunt v. Tulsa Terrazzo & Mosaic Co. neutral okla · 1932 2 sentences 1977She cites Hunt v. Tulsa Terrazzo & Mosaic Co., 157 Okl. 174 , 11 P.2d 521 (1932) to support her position that a judgment will not be reversed because of defects in the petition when the deficiencies are supplied by the proofs. 1977She cites Hunt v. Tulsa Terrazzo & Mosaic Co., 157 Okl. 174 , 11 P.2d 521 (1932) to support her position that a judgment will not be reversed because of defects in the petition when the deficiencies are supplied by the proofs.	1	1977–1977
Belveal v. Rambo green oklacrimapp · 1971 1 sentence 1974However, Sussman is distinguishable from the case of Belveal, supra. In Belveal as in the instant case, the trial court after hearing testimony continued the case to a day certain, so additional evidence could be heard prior to the court making its decision on the guilt or innocence of defendant.	1	1974–1974
Carter v. State green oklacrimapp · 1956 1 sentence 1958We are satisfied from the lengthy. findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the trial court after hearing evidence on the motion, supported by the record, that the defendant herein did have a preliminary hearing on an amended complaint which the information on which he was tried was based, and that the case of Carter v. State, supra, and other cases cited, are not applicable.	1	1958–1958
Mason v. State green oklacrimapp · 1923 1 sentence 1952Cr. 111 , 212 P. 1028 , this court held: “Technical rules of pleading need not be adhered to in the preliminary complaint to the same extent as may be required in the information in the trial court.” It should be borne in mind that the amended information upon which the defendant Vahlberg was tried was filed after one of his alleged eoconspirators was discharged in the justice of the peace court, and the other named in the original information filed in the district court was discharged by the trial court after a hearing on a motion to quash the information.	1	1952–1952
Wood v. State green oklacrimapp · 1941 1 sentence 1951“After a confession has been admitted, the defendant is entitled to have the evidence in regard to the circumstances under which it was made given anew to the jury, not that the jury may pass upon its competency *385 or admissibility, but for the purpose of enabling them to judge what weight and value should be given to it as evidence, and upon his request the defendant is entitled to an instruction on that point.” And it was specifically held in Wood v. State, 72 Okla.	1	1951–1951
Phelps v. Malone neutral okla · 1943 2 sentences 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 . 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 .	1	1948–1948
Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co. neutral okla · 1942 2 sentences 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 . 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 .	1	1948–1948
Groseclose v. Sutherland green okla · 1944 2 sentences 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 . 1948See Heffermon v. Higdon, 189 Okla. 434 , 117 P. 2d 768 ; Phelps v. Malone, 193 Okla. 239 , 142 P. 2d 849 ; Smith v. Arrow Drilling Co., 191 Okla. 381 , 130 P. 2d 95 , and Groseclose v. Sutherland, 194 Okla. 479 , 153 P. 2d 479 .	1	1948–1948
Porter v. Rott green okla · 1926 2 sentences 1935The offense of usury is well defined by this court in Porter et al. v. Rott et al., 116 Okla. 3 , 243 P. 160 , in which the court stated in first paragraph of the syllabus: “To constitute the offense of ‘usury,’ there must be a corrupt intent to do something which is in violation of the statutes, and the lender must knowingly and intentionally charge a greater rate of interest than that prescribed by the law.” The trial court after hearing all the evidence and argument found that both parties entered into the transaction in good faith, and that there was no intention to charge usury in the tra 1935The offense of usury is well defined by this court in Porter et al. v. Rott et al., 116 Okla. 3 , 243 P. 160 , in which the court stated in first paragraph of the syllabus: “To constitute the offense of ‘usury,’ there must be a corrupt intent to do something which is in violation of the statutes, and the lender must knowingly and intentionally charge a greater rate of interest than that prescribed by the law.” The trial court after hearing all the evidence and argument found that both parties entered into the transaction in good faith, and that there was no intention to charge usury in the tra	1	1935–1935
Tarkington v. State neutral oklacrimapp · 1929 1 sentence 1930Cr. 423 , 273 Pac. 1015, 1016 , this court said: “The admissibility of a confession, where it is challenged, is a question solely for the court after hearing, in the absence of the jury, all the evidence on each side respecting the circumstances under which the confession was made; and the court is vested with a large discretion in determining the matter.” *383 The court had the witnesses before him and could observe their demeanor on the stand, their general conduct and appearance, and their manner of testifying, and was in a much better position to form a just estimate of their truthfulness	1	1930–1930
Moore v. State neutral oklacrimapp · 1921 1 sentence 1925Cr. 102 , 197 P. 1064 .	1	1925–1925
Mays v. State green · 1920 1 sentence 1925“The admissibility of a confession, where it is chai- *26 lenged, is a question solely for the court after hearing, in the absence of the jury, all the evidence on each side respecting the circumstances under which the confession was made; and the court is vested with a large discretion m determining the matter.” See, also, Mays v. State, 19 Okla.	1	1925–1925
Gaines Bros. & Co. v. Citizens' Bank of Henryetta neutral okla · 1921 1 sentence 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Childers v. Vernon neutral okla · 1922 2 sentences 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed. 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Schaff v. McGuyre neutral okla · 1922 2 sentences 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed. 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Ex Parte Spears neutral oklacrimapp · 1947 1 sentence 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Hartley v. Riley neutral okla · 1922 1 sentence 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Bradley & Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin neutral okla · 1922 2 sentences 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed. 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Nelson v. Golden neutral okla · 1921 2 sentences 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed. 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Gayer v. Pearce green okla · 1922 2 sentences 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed. 1923Gaines Bros & Co. v. Citizens’ Bank of Henryetta, 84 Okla. 265 , 204 Pac. 121 ; Gayer v. Pearce, 86 Okla. 102 , 206 Pac. 822 ; Schaff v. McGuyre, 87 Okla. 41 , 208 Pac. 263 ; Childers v. Vernon, 85 Okla. 68 , 204 Pac. 641 ; Bradley, Metcalf Co. v. McLaughlin, 87 Okla. 34 , 208 Pac. 1032 ; Hartley v. Riley, 85 Okla. 101 , 204 Pac. 920 ; Nelson v. Golden, 84 Okla. 29 , 202 Pac. 308 . .Record examined in this case, and held, the judgment of the trial court is reasonably supported by the evidence and the same should be affirmed.	1	1923–1923
Ellison v. Beannabia neutral okla · 1896 1 sentence 1904In Ellison v. Beannabia, 4 Okla. 347 , in passing upon this question, the court said: “Under the code of civil procedure, the court now hears oral testimony in chancery cases, and like a jury, considers the witnesses, observes their intelligence and capacity, their fairness or bias, their manner and characteristics, and has thus opportunities for judging the value of the testimony, such as this court cannot have.	1	1904–1904

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 991c (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 96 (1905–2025) CA 44 (1912–2026) TX 42 (1925–2018) AL 41 (1849–2025) NY 27 (1926–2024) IL 27 (1869–2024) OK 19 (1904–2010) OH 18 (1996–2026) KS 18 (1930–2026) LA 16 (1935–2022) GA 16 (1924–2024) FL 14 (1919–2018) MO 12 (1911–2024) AK 12 (1979–2021) MI 12 (1912–2024) IN 11 (1916–2016) CT 9 (1903–2026) ND 9 (1996–2018) WA 8 (1929–2025) KY 8 (1908–2024) MD 8 (1936–2015) NJ 8 (1893–2021) NM 7 (1970–2024) DC 7 (1970–1996) OR 6 (1950–2018) VT 6 (1942–2023) NE 6 (1956–2016) NC 5 (1915–2025) UT 5 (1938–2023) MA 5 (1930–1990) VA 4 (1959–2010) RI 4 (1919–2009) CO 4 (1943–2025) AZ 3 (1971–2023) ME 3 (1976–2019) WI 3 (1994–2020) MN 3 (2002–2006) MS 3 (1975–1995) TN 3 (1944–2010) IA 2 (1953–2003) MT 2 (1909–2001) WV 2 (1918–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check